نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه تهران، ایران

2 دانشگاه تهران

10.34785/J011.2019.931

چکیده

در برنامه­ریزی منطقه­ای، لزوم اتخاذ رویکرد فضایی که تمام سکونتگاه­های منطقه را مورد توجه قرار دهد، بسیار حائز اهمیت است. اما نگاه موجود نقطه­ای به سکونتگاه­های شهری و روستایی در کشور، سبب شکل­گیری نوعی از توسعه منطقه­ای متناسب با همین نگاه و رویکرد شده است. حال آن که با در نظر گرفتن روابط این دو سکونتگاه در برنامه­ریزی، می­توان روستاها را به عنوان یکی از مراکزاصلی تولید غذایی کشور و مکانی که سازنده اغلب شهرهای آینده است، مورد توجه قرار داده، از مشکلات مراکز شهری بزرگ کاسته و سکونتگاه­های پیرامونی آنها را نیز تقویت نمود.در این میان مجموعه شهری مشهد با برخورداری از نقش فرامنطقه­ای زیارتی مشهد، مهاجرپذیری زیادی از سمت دیگر سکونتگاه­ها داشته و این موضوع بیش از هرچیز، رابطه بین شهر و روستا و تأثیر محسوس آنها بر توسعه یکدیگر را در این منطقه نشان می­دهد. بر این اساس، این پژوهش برای بررسی روابط روستا شهری، دو نوع نظریه در حوزه ارتباط بین سکونتگاه­ها شامل نظریات سلسله مراتبی اندازه مبنا(مکان محور) و سلسله مراتبی شبکه مبنا(جریان محور) را مورد توجه قرار می­دهد. در ابتدا به کمک دسته نخست نظریات، پس از تدوین شاخص­های مکانی، به روش تحلیل عاملی، با سطح­بندی شهرها و روستاها، جایگاه هر سکونتگاه در مجموعه شهری مشخص می­شود. دسته دوم نظریات شاخص­های بررسی روابط شهر و روستا شامل انواع روابط اقتصادی، خدماتی، سازمانی و جمعیتی را ارائه می­دهد که وضعیت هر یک از طریق مصاحبه عمیق با ساکنان روستاها به دست می­آید. به کمک اطلاعات این شاخص­ها و جمع­بندی از تلفیق یافته­های مربوط به شاخص­های مکانی و جریانی به دست آمده، نوع توسعه شکل گرفته در مجموعه شهری مشهد مشخص شده و پس از آن روستاها برحسب موقعیتشان نسبت به کلانشهر و شهرها تقسیم­بندی می­شوند. در نهایت این پژوهش علل روابط روستا شهری کارآمد را مشخص می­کند تا در برنامه­ریزی منطقه­ای و حرکت به سمت توسعه متوازن منطقه­ای مورد توجه قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Rural-urban linkage analysis in the regional development (Case study: Mashhad Metropolitan Area)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Motahhareh Moghiseh 1
  • Esfandyar Zebardast 2

1 University of Tehran

2 University of Tehran

چکیده [English]

In regional planning, it is very important to adopt a spatial approach that takes into account all the settlements in the area.
In Iran, there is often a one-dimensional look to urban and rural settlements so that the mutual influence between urban and rural settlements is disregarded while, in reality, both of them have a direct and tangible effect on each other and generally on the regional development.
Taking this point into account, the following outcomes could be expected: 
More realistic planning, reduction of the problems of large urban centers, strengthening peripheral settlements and paying more attention to villages as food production centers and as future cities.
Mashhad metropolitan area is a place of pilgrimage in Iran. As a result, this region has accepted a considerable number of immigrants from other urban and rural settlements. It thus well demonstrates the rural-urban linkage and the effect of rural and urban regions on each other.
This paper employs two types of theories: size-based and network-based hierarchical theories. Regional indexes are first defined using the first type of theories. Then, using the factor and cluster analysis method, the villages and cities will be ranked using more indexes.
The second theory provides us with a different type of information that plays a role in rural-urban relationship. These indexes involve:
1-      Financial flows (essential and non-essential goods, income, labor and manufacturing relations)
2-       Services (educational, health care, technology and banking relations, infrastructure, transport and communication network)
3-      Physical flow (distance from the city(
4-      Organizational and population indexes.
The data was collected by interviewing the residents of rural regions. Members of the village council generally had more complete information.
Afterwards, the different layers of the flows were put together and analyzed by the GIS software. The final score of each flow was calculated.
Three results were obtained in this research by analyzing the collected data:
1-      The development type in Mashhad metropolitan area was determined. Consequently, the relationship between this kind of development and rural-urban linkage, present in this region, was explained.
The result shows that there is often a unilateral relationship between Mashhad and other settlements, which represents the polar and central spatial structure of the area.
2-      Moreover, the features of different villages were determined according to their position towards Mashhad metropolis. These positions involve:
A-    Located near the city of Mashhad
B-    Located on the main road leading to the metropolis or a small town.
C-    None of the above conditions
This division shows that the first type of villages have the highest people, goods, services, capital, and information flows. These flows are less in the second type of villages. Immigration becomes permanent in the third type of villages.
3-       Finally, this research determines the cause of efficient urban-rural relationships. These contain:
A-    Capacity and accepted capital
B-    How capacity and capital is distributed
C-    The amount of effort and ability settlements centers to benefit from others
These factors can be useful in formulating the principles to achieve balanced regional development strategies.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Rural-urban linkage
  • balanced development
  • regional network
  • Mashhad metropolitan area
  • Afrakhte, H., et al. (2012). "The role of space flows in the proses of creep rural." Physical Spatial Planning Quarterly: 11 -24. [in persian]
  • Arseh-Farnahad (2012). Northeast of the country Physical plan. Tehran. [in persian]
  • Asadi, I. and E. Zebardast (2010). "Typology of City-based Regions in Urban and Regional Studies: with an emphasis on concept of “Majmoo-e-ye shahri” in Iran." Honar-ha-ye-ziba (JFAUP) 2(43): 17-30. [in persian]
  • Asgari, M. (2013). studing and offering of optimal pattern urban model in Khorasan region. Tehran, University of Tehran. [in persian]
  • AzarBadi, N., et al. (2014). "The Explanation of Population Flows Network in the Firouzkooh Township." geographical-space: 95-110. [in persian]
  • bayat, M. (2009). "A Cluster Analysis of the Development Evaluation of the villages of Kavar District in Shiraz Township." Geography and Environmental Planning 20(1): 113-131. [in persian]
  • Douglass, M. (1998). "A Regional Network Strategy for Reciprocal Rural-Urban Linkages: An Agenda for Policy Research with Reference to Indonesia." Third world planning review.
  • Eftekhari, A. R. and M. Aghayari (2008). "Rating of Sustainability Rural Development " geographical research Quarterly 39(9). [in persian]
  • Eppler, U., et al. (2015). "Urban-Rural Linkages and Global Sustainable Land Use." IINAS.
  • Ghiyasvand, A. and H. M. Far (2011). "Comparison of methods for level determination of development of cities in South Khorasan Province." Financial Economics: 188-165.
  • Hedayat, H. A., et al. (2015). "Analysis of the Rural Development System Using the Integrated Regional Network Pattern (Case Study: Iraq, Kirkuk Province)." Rural Research 6(3): 635-654. [in persian]
  • Kakadezfuli, A. (2014). Ranking and analysis of development rural areas in Khuzestan province based on the development index by SAW model. Sustainable Geography and development. [in persian]
  • Kardovani, P. and M. Niku (2006). "Ranking of the Biza Villages based on population potential, economic power and access." Geographical research 38(1): 131-147. [in persian]
  • Kneep, G. (2002). "Stedelijke bewegingsruimte, over veranderingen in staden land." The Hague: Sdu uitgevers.
  • Mashhad regional plan, Farnahad advisors. 2006
  • Mehr, S. S. H. (2013). "Studing Rating villages services of Astara country Based on the Moris model In order to providing development strategies." territory 10(4): 67-55. [in persian]
  • Mulayi, M., et al. (2002). Isc (26): 147-170. [in persian]
  • Mulayi, M., et al. (2002). "Studing and comparing the efficiency of small and large industrial groups in Iran." ISC (26): 147-170.Musavi, M. S. (2013). "Determination and analysis of the development levels of the village district of Chaldoran." Geography and Planning: 215-235. [in persian]
  • MUSHI, N. (2003). "REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH RURAL-URBAN LINKAGES: The Dar-es Salaam Impact Region." University of Dortmund.
  • Rezvani, M. and M. Shahcheragh (2011). "Rural–urban ties, immigration networks and rural development: Case study of Dehmala region, Semnan province." Community Development (Rural and Urban Communities) 3(1). [in persian]
  • Rezvani, M., et al. (2014). "THE IMPACT OF RURAL-URBAN LINKAGES ON DIVERSIFICATION OF THE RURAL ECONOMY WITH EMPHASIS ON WOODCRAFT (CASE STUDY: JOWKAR DISTRICT, MALAYER COUNTY, AND HAMEDAN PROVINCE)." Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences ISSN.
  • Rondinelli.D.A(1997). "RURAL-URBAN LINKAGES AND DEVELOPMENT: A CASE STUDY OF NORTH SULAWESI, INDONESIA. M.A." The Flinders University of South Australia.
  • Saeedi, A. and F. Taghizadeh (2005). "Regional Networking Strategy, Urban Rural Links and Regional Development." Journal of the Iranian Geographic Society: 47-33. [in persian]
  • Saeedi, A. and R. Soltani (2004). "The role of metropolitan links in the spatial transformation of peripheral villages (Hesar village of Mashhad metropolitan area)." Journal of the Iranian Geographic Society: 35-48. [in persian]
  • Saeedi, A., et al. (2012). "Comparative Study of Barriers to the Formation of Urban Village Links (Marvdasht and Koohdasht)." Journal of the Iranian Geographic Society: 26-27. [in persian]
  • samiei, D., et al. (2013). "Converting the village to the city and Its role in regional development and in the evolutions of the urban system." Arid regions Geographic Studies: 17-36. [in persian]
  • Sarrafi, M. (1998). Principles of Regional Planning and Development. Tehran, Iran Planning Organization. [in persian]
  • Sepehrdust, S. (2009). "Investigating Government Performance in Socio-Economic Development of Villages in Hamedan Province." Village and development: 69-85. [in persian]
  • Shakur, A., et al. (2013). "An analysis of the spatial distribution of facilities, Rural Services and Leveling of Dorudzan Marvdasht Villages." Geography and Environmental Studies: 63- 79. [in persian]
  • Statistical Center of Iran, https://www.amar.org.ir
  • Tavakkoliniya, J. and M. Shali (2011). "Regional inequalities in Iran." Quarteriy Journal of Environmental Based Territorial planning: 1-15. [in persian]
  • Yusefi, E., et al. (2013). "An evolution analysis of the of small town status in the country's urban system during the period of 1335-85." New Attitudes in Human Geography (25): 35-54. [in persian]
  • Zebardast, E. and M. Shahabi (2013). "Analisys the Capacity of Development in Multicentric Urban areas (case study: Central Mazandaran Metropolitan area)." Regional Planning Quarterly 4(11): 48-33. [in persian]
  • Zedardast, E. and K. Hajipour (2005). "Analysis and offering a model for the urban system of Khuzestan province." Honar-ha-ye-ziba (JFAUP) 23(23). [in persian]
  • Ziyar, K. (2000). Principles and Methods of Planning. Tehran, University of Tehran. [in persian]