نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار وعضو هیات علمی دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران

2 کارشناس ارشد برنامه ریزی شهری، گروه شهرسازی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

3 کارشناس ارشد جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.

10.34785/J011.2019.827

چکیده

شهرهای امروزی به اصلی‌ترین مکان برای کار و زندگی انسان‌ها تبدیل شده‌اند؛ از این رو با چالش‌های بسیاری در زمینه‌های اجتماعی، اقتصادی، زیست‌محیطی و مدیریتی مواجه هستند. تداوم این روند، کاهش کیفیت زندگی و به دنبال آن کاهش زیست‌پذیری شهرها را در پی خواهد داشت. این پژوهش بر آن است تا میزان زیست‌پذیری بخش مرکزی شهر بروجرد را مورد بررسی و تحلیل قرار دهد. پژوهش حاضر از حیث هدف از جمله تحقیقات اکتشافی_شناختی، از لحاظ ماهیت و روش تحقیق، توصیفی_تحلیلی و از نظر داده، از جمله تحقیقات کمی_کیفی است. برای دستیابی به اهداف از دو بخش مطالعات اسنادی و میدانی (پرسشنامه) استفاده گردید. واحد تحلیل، 230 نفر از سکنه بخش مرکزی شهر بروجرد است. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از نرم‌افزار GIS وSPSS  (آزمون‌های تی‌تک نمونه‌ای، آنووا و فریدمن) و در ترسیم مدل تحلیلی ساختارها از مدل معادلات ساختاریAmos  استفاده شده است. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که ابعاد و شاخص‌های زیست‌پذیری در بخش مرکزی شهر بروجرد از مطلوبیت بالایی برخوردار است. همچنین در مقایسه بین محلات بخش مرکزی از نظر میانگین شاخص‌ها و ابعاد مشخص گردید که زیست‌پذیرترین محله، محله صوفیان است و دودانگه از کمترین میزان زیست‌پذیری نسبت به سایر محلات برخوردار است. در اولویت‌بندی فریدمن، بعد خدمات، فعالیت‌ها و امکانات شهری در رتبه نخست و بعد اقتصاد شهری در رتبه آخر قرارگرفته است. در مدل معادلات ساختاری که به وسیله نرم افزار ایموس ترسیم شد، در بین ابعاد، بعد اقتصاد شهری بیشترین تأثیر بر عوامل محیطی و زیست‌محیطی را داشته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

livability analysis in neighborhoods of the central part of Borujerd city

نویسندگان [English]

  • taher parizadi 1
  • mahdi moradi 2
  • masoumeh saki 3

2 Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch

3 Master of Geography and Urban Planner, Kharazmi University of Tehran

چکیده [English]

Modern cities have turned into the main places for people to work and live in; therefore, they are confronted with many challenges from social, economic, environmental, and managerial aspects. The rapid growth of population, urban population in particular, and extensive immigration from the village to the city, mainly to large cities, along with the need to meet the immigrants’ needs highlights the necessity of considering the existing districts and neighborhoods of the city in order to prevent its horizontal growth and decrease in the importance of its internal fabric. If the trend continues, it will lead to a decline in the quality of life and, consequently, in urban viability. A viable urban system is one where all the inhabitants’ social, economic, physical, and psychological health is considered. Viability can be seen as a way of achieving sustainable development, where urban viability can be obtained through viable neighborhoods. A viable city is one where you can live a healthy life, a city for everyone. It is regarded as a link between the past and the present. That is, it esteems the historical symbols on the one side, and acknowledges what has not yet been born on the other. The immethodical development of Iranian cities over the past few decades has confronted the urban areas with many problems, such as economic, social, and environmental ones. This research seeks to investigate the amount of viability in the central district of the city of Boroujerd. This district holds the greatest place identity in the area due to the availability of ancient, valuable elements including historical monuments such as Imam Mosque, the bazaar, squares, and several religious centers, location in the initial core and distressed area of the city, and several old passages with narrow alleys, which are characteristic of the historic fabric of a city. As the city has grown, some neighborhoods have thrived further, and others have lost their prosperity. As a result, viability and quality of life vary from neighborhood to neighborhood. The present research is a cognitive-heuristic in terms of purpose, involving a quantitative-qualitative study in terms of data and pursuing a descriptive-analytical approach in terms of nature and methodology. To achieve the purposes, the research was conducted in two parts: a documentary and a field study (questionnaire). The unit of analysis included the inhabitants of the central district of Boroujerd. Estimated sample size was calculated using the Cochran formula as 230 people aged between 15 and 70 years. GIS and SPSS (one-sample t test, ANOVA, and Friedman test) were used for data analysis, and Amos structural equation modeling for diagramming the analytical models of the structures. The research findings demonstrated that the aspects and indices of viability in the central district of Boroujerd are highly desirable. Furthermore, a comparison of the neighborhoods in the central district in terms of index and aspect mean indicated that the most viable neighborhood was Soufiyan, while the Dodange neighborhood exhibited the lowest amount of viability. According to Friedman’s prioritization, the aspects of urban services, activities, and amenities were ranked first, and urban economy was ranked last. In the structural equation model diagrammed in Amos, the aspect of urban economy exhibited the greatest impact on the environmental factors.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Urban Viability
  • Central District
  • Boroujerd
  • Structural Equations
  • Ahmadi, Fereshteh. (2014). Evaluating Quality of Life Indicators with Emphasis on the Principles of a Living City (Case Study: Golestan Town in Tehran District 22). Master's dissertation. Islamic Azad University of Tehran. Tehran. (In Persian)
  • Alizadeh, Sajad. (2014). Assessment of viability factors with an emphasis on participatory approach (Case study: Beryanak, District 1, Tehran Municipality). Master's thesis. Islamic Azad University of Tehran. Tehran. (In Persian)
  • Alibabaei, Yahya. (2012). Amos Statistical Software Training Booklet (AMOS). University of Tehran. Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology. (In Persian)
  • Bandarabad, Alireza. (2011). The Living City from Foundations to Meaning. (First Edition). Tehran: Azarakhsh Publications. (In Persian)
  • 3. Bandar Abad, Alireza. (2010). Formulation of the principles of the spatial development model and the shape of the habitable Iranian city (case study: Regions 1, 15 & 22 of Tehran). Ph.D. dissertation. Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch. Tehran. (In Persian)
  • Clark, David. (2009). Urban world, world city. (Mehdi Gharkhlou & Forough Khazainejad, translators). Tehran: Selection Publishing. (In Persian)
  • Cities plus. (2003). A sustainable urban system: the long term plan for greater Vancouver,  cannada, cities plus.
  • Evans, P. (2002). Livable Cities? Urban Struggles for Livelihood and Sustainability University of California Press Ltd: USA, pp: 2-30.
  • Iranian Center for Statistics. (2011). Population and Housing Census of Lorestan Province. (In Persian)
  • Jafari Asadabadi, Hamzeh. (2013). Study of urban viability for sustainable urban development (studied in Tehran metropolis). Master's dissertation. kharazmi University. Tehran. (In Persian)
  • Khatami, Yahya. (2012). Investigating Different Approaches to Sustainable Urban Land Use. Second Conference on Environmental Planning and Management. Tehran: Tehran University. (In Persian)
  • Larice, M.Z. (2005). Great neighborhood: the livability and morphology of highdensity neighborhoods in urban North America, PhD thesis in University of California, Berkeley.
  • Maccrea, Rod; & Walters, Peter. (2012). Impacts of Urban Consolidation on Urban Liveability: Comparing an Inner and Outer Suburb in Brisbane, Australia, Jurnal Housing, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp 190-206.
  • Mc Nulty, R.h. (1998). whats livability? Presenation a conference sponsored by the seoul (south, Korea) metro Politian.
  • M Wheler, Stephen. (2014). Planning for sustainability, creating a viable, balanced and ecological community. (Mahmoud Jomeh Pour & Shokoufeh Ahmadi, translators). Tehran: Social Science Publishing.
  • Mirmoghtadaei, Mahta; Rafieyan, Mojtaba; & Sangi, Elham. (2010). The concept of intermediate expansion and its necessity in urban neighborhoods. Municipalities, No. 98. (In Persian)
  • Norris, Tyler; & Mary, Pittman. (2000). the health community’s movement and the coalition for heal their cities and communities, public health reports 115: 118-124.
  • Radcliff, B. (2001). Politics, markets and lifesatis faction: the Political economy of human happiness, American Political science Review.
  • Ray Old Berg. (1991). the Great Good place. 
  • Saitluanga, B. (2014). Spatial Pattern of Urban Livability in HimalayanRegion: A Case of Aizawl City, India. Social Indicators  Research , 117, pp: 541-559.
  • Soleimani Mehranjani, Mohammad; Tavallaei, Simin; Rafieyan; Mojtaba; Zanganeh; Ahmad; & KhazaiNejad; Forough. (2016). Urban Sustainability: Concepts, Principles, Dimensions and Indicators. Urban Planning Geography, Volume 4, Issue 1. (In Persian)
  • Sasanpour, Farzaneh; Tavallaei, Simin; Jafari Asadabadi, Hamzeh. (2015). Measuring and assessing urban viability in twenty-two metropolitan areas of Tehran metropolitan area. Regional Planning Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 18. (In Persian)
  • Southworth, M. (2003). Measuring the Livable City, Built Environment.
  • Van Kamp, Irene; Leidelmeijer, Kees; Marsman, Gooitske; & De Hollander. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being: Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study, Landscape and Urban Planning, pp 5-18.