عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]چکیده [English]
The concept of justice is dependent on time and place and so far a definition for it has not been provided. Nevertheless, justice in urban planning is related with fair distribution of resources and public services in a city. Although the demand for distributive justice in urban planning is necessary, it is not sufficient on its own because it neglects fundamental and structural questions such as the distribution of power in the city. No doubt, executing any plans and designs has good impacts on some citizens and bad impacts on citizens with less social and economic power. From this viewpoint, urban development plans and designs are key tools for reducing economic-social inequity in cities. Since urban planning is related to allocation and distribution of scarce resources among various places in the city, it is important for urban planning to rely on criterion such as justice. Otherwise, it can lead to more enjoyment of some places compared to others in a city. The contact point of urban planning and social justice is distributive justice. Distributive justice is based on the distribution of municipal services in the city according to the two criteria of “accessibility” and “spatial distribution”. In recent decades, one of the most important outputs of rapid urbanization and physical development of cities in Iran has been a disintegration in the distribution system of civil service centers. It has been the basis for unequal enjoyment of the service system by residents in cities. Thus, the most important duty of urban planners and managers is to achieve just distribution of public services for different groups in urban society and to decrease inequality in accessibility to public services such as health and educational services, and green spaces. Unjust distribution of public services will lead to social crises and spatial complex problems in cities. By considering the importance of this issue, the key aim of this study is to evaluate the level of just distribution of municipal services in Hamadan city. It seems that the distribution of municipal services in Hamadan city is unjust. The present study is a developmental study using descriptive analysis methodology. To measure residents’ access to municipal services, network analysis method was employed. To measure the spatial distribution of municipal services, the Gary Moran coefficients were used. The findings of this study show that resident access to educational, sport, health, cultural and religious and green space services in Hamadan city is not acceptable. Moreover, spatial distribution of municipal services in Hamadan city has a cluster pattern. The cluster pattern in spatial distribution of municipal services indicates that some areas have more services than others in the city. The study results show that distribution of municipal services in Hamadan city is unjust. This injustice has various consequences and it can be a barrier to achieving sustainable development. In addition, it can lead to civil protests. It is recommended that city managers who eliminate and decrease present injustices in the distribution of municipal services should be given top priority.
Alizadeh, B. and M. Pourjafar. (2013). explaining of conceptual and practical framework from justice distribution of building density in Islamic cities: the case study, Kashan city. National Conference on Islamic architecture and urbanism, Tabriz Islamic Art University.
Chang, H. S., & Liao, C. H. (2011). Exploring an integrated method for measuring the relative spatial equity in public facilities in the context of urban parks. Cities, No. 28(5), pp. 361–371.
Consulting Engineers of TADBIR –SHAHR. (2006). Reorganization plan of informal settlements of Hamadan city. Urban development and civil organization, Ministry of Roads & Urban Development of Iran.
Dadashpoor, H. ; B. Alizadeh and F. Rostami .(2015). Determination of Conceptual Framework From Spatial Justice in City with Focus on the Justice Concept in Islamic Academy. Journal of Naqshejahan-Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning, Vol. 5, No. 1.
Dadashpoor, H. ; B. Alizadeh and F. Rostami .(2015). Spatial justice dialectic in city. First edition, Azarakhsh press.
Dadashpoor, H. and Rostami. F .(1390 A). Review an Analyzing of distribution of urban public services from the perspective of spatial justice. Journal of Geography and Regional Development, No. 16, pp. 171-198
Dadashpoor, H. and Rostami. F .(2011). Measurement of Integrated Index of Spatial Justice in the Distribution of Urban Public Services Based on Population Distribution, Accessibility and Efficiency in Yasuj Ciy. Journal of Urban - Regional Studies and Research, No.10, pp. 1-22.
Greer, J (2002). Equity in the spatial distribution of urban services. The University of Texas at Dallas.
Habibi. M and Masayeli. M. (2008). Per capita urban land use. First edition, National organization of Land and housing press.
Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city, London press.
Hataminejad, H. (2008). Analysis of social inequalities in the enjoyment of the land use of Urban Services. Journal of Human Geography, No. 65, pp. 71-85.
Jean, H. (2009). Shadows of power: an allegory of prudence on land use planning. Translated by Pouladi, K. Iranian Society of Consulting Engineers press.
Khakpour, B. (2008-9). Review and analyzing the Inequalities in Development Levels of Mashhad Regions. Journal of Knowledge and Development, No. 27, pp. 182-202.
Kyushik, Oh. Jeong, Seunghyun (2007). Assessing the spatial distribution of urban parks using GIS. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.82, No. 1, pp. 25–32.
Lotfi, S and Koohsari,M. J (2009). Measuring objective accessibility to neighborhood facilities in the city, A case study: Zone 6 in Tehran, Iran. Cities, Vol. 26, No. 1 ,pp. 133–140 .
Lynch, K. (2002). A Theory of Good City. (Translated by Bahrini, H. ), second edition, Tehran University Press.
Mayer, D .(2009). Distributive Justice, Encyclopedia of Social Psychologyn , 15 press.
Rahnama, M. and Zabihi., J. (2012) . Analysis of the distribution of urban public facilities in spatial justice with accessibility integrated model in Mashhad City. Journal of Geography and Development, No. 23, pp. 5-26.
Rahnama. M. (2008). Principles, fundamentals and models to measuring of city physical form. Academic center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR), Mashhad press.
Smith, D. M. (1994). Geography and social justice, Oxford: Blackwell.
Taleaia.M, Sliuzas.R & Flacke.J. (2014). An integrated framework to evaluate the equity of urban public facilities using spatial multi-criteria analysis, Cities, No. 40, pp. 56–69.
Talen, E (1996). The Social Equity of Urban Service Distribution: An Exploration of Park Access in Pueblo., Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, No. 9610.
Talen, E (1998). Visualizing Fairness: Equity Maps for Planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp.22-36.
Talen, E (2002). The Social Goals of New Urbanism. Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp.165-188.
Talen, E and L. Anselin (1998). Assessing Spatial Equity: An Evaluation of Measures of Accessibility to Public Playgrounds. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp: 595-613.
Tsou, Ko-Wan,Yu-Ting Hung , and Yao-Lin Chang (2005). An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities, Vol.22, No. 6, pp.424–435
Varesi, H. (2008). A Comparative Analysis of distribution of urban public services from the perspective of social justice, case study : Zahedan city. Journal of Geography and Development, No. 11, pp. 139-156.
Young, I. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.