Urban Planning
Mojtaba Rafieian; Nafiseh Zahed
Abstract
HighlightsThis study conducts a systematic literature review and qualitative analysis to examine research on Family-Friendly Cities published between 1995 and 2025.Bibliometric analyses identify major research trends, thematic clusters, and research gaps within the Family-Friendly City literature.The ...
Read More
HighlightsThis study conducts a systematic literature review and qualitative analysis to examine research on Family-Friendly Cities published between 1995 and 2025.Bibliometric analyses identify major research trends, thematic clusters, and research gaps within the Family-Friendly City literature.The qualitative analysis develops a framework comprising six principal dimensions of the Family-Friendly City.Family-Friendly City planning has evolved from a primary emphasis on physical infrastructure toward broader objectives of sustainability and urban livability.The limited body of research conducted in the Global South underscores the need for context-sensitive urban approaches that respond to local socio-spatial conditions. IntroductionThe rapid growth of urbanization and the increasing complexity of family life have encouraged scholars and urban planners to reconsider the relationship between urban environments and family well-being. The concept of the family-friendly city (FFC) emerged in the mid-1990s as an approach aimed at creating urban environments that support diverse family structures, improve quality of life, and strengthen social sustainability. Since its emergence, various cities have developed policies and planning strategies addressing issues such as housing affordability, public spaces, childcare services, transportation accessibility, and social inclusion.Despite growing attention to this concept, the literature still lacks a comprehensive theoretical understanding of what constitutes a family-friendly city and how its dimensions and indicators should be defined. Existing studies have often focused on specific aspects of family life, such as family-friendly housing, child-friendly environments, workplace policies, or social services, resulting in a fragmented understanding of the concept. Moreover, previous research has mainly concentrated on developed countries, particularly in North America and Europe, while family needs and urban challenges in developing contexts remain insufficiently explored.Therefore, this study aims to address this knowledge gap by systematically reviewing existing research on family-friendly cities and developing an integrated conceptual framework. The study seeks to answer three main questions: How has the concept of the family-friendly city evolved over time? What are the main dimensions and indicators that define this concept? And what conceptual framework can explain the characteristics of a family-friendly city?Theoretical FrameworkThe theoretical foundation of this study is based on the understanding that the family-friendly city is a multidimensional urban approach located at the intersection of family needs, urban planning, sustainability, and social justice. Unlike earlier approaches that primarily emphasized physical improvements, contemporary interpretations consider the city as a supportive environment for families across the life course, including children, working parents, older adults, single-parent households, and multigenerational families.The concept draws upon broader urban theories related to sustainable development, livability, inclusive planning, and social well-being. A family-friendly city is understood as an urban environment that provides equitable access to affordable and diverse housing, safe public spaces, accessible transportation, employment opportunities, social services, and participatory governance mechanisms.Based on the qualitative synthesis of previous studies, this research conceptualizes the family-friendly city through six interconnected dimensions: spatial, social, economic, environmental, governance and participation, and temporal dimensions. These dimensions reflect not only the physical characteristics of urban environments but also social relations, institutional arrangements, family participation, and work–life balance.MethodologyThis research adopts a systematic review and qualitative synthesis approach to examine the evolution and characteristics of family-friendly city studies. The literature search was conducted in the Scopus and Web of Science databases, covering publications from 1995 to 2025. The inclusion criteria focused on studies directly related to family-friendly urban planning and excluded studies limited to workplace family policies or non-urban family services.Following the removal of duplicates and the application of screening criteria based on the PRISMA protocol, 57 articles were selected for final analysis. The study employed bibliometric techniques, including citation analysis and keyword co-occurrence analysis, using VOSviewer software to identify research trends, conceptual networks, and major thematic clusters.In addition to the bibliometric analysis, a qualitative review of the selected studies was conducted. Through qualitative coding and thematic analysis, key concepts, dimensions, indicators, and conceptual relationships were identified. This combination of quantitative mapping and qualitative interpretation enabled the development of a comprehensive conceptual model of the family-friendly city.Results and DiscussionThe findings reveal that research on family-friendly cities has experienced a fluctuating growth pattern between 1997 and 2025, with a significant increase in publications after 2019 and a notable turning point around 2020. The United States represents the leading geographical context, accounting for the largest share of publications and citations, indicating a strong concentration of knowledge production in North America and Europe.The bibliometric analysis identifies several major thematic clusters, including social and perceptual dimensions, housing and public space, urban planning and mental health, life course and diversity, sustainability and livability, urban policies and family, and urban development. These clusters demonstrate a conceptual transition from early studies focusing mainly on physical infrastructure toward broader approaches emphasizing sustainability, social inclusion, and quality of life.The qualitative analysis indicates that the family-friendly city consists of six major dimensions. The spatial dimension emphasizes affordable housing, accessible services, safe public spaces, and sustainable transportation. The social dimension highlights social capital, community interaction, diversity, and family support networks. The economic dimension focuses on employment opportunities and economic conditions that support family stability. The environmental dimension addresses safety, sustainability, and healthy living environments. The governance and participation dimension emphasizes family involvement in decision-making processes. Finally, the temporal dimension considers work–life balance and the changing needs of families throughout different stages of life.The findings also reveal that family-friendly planning should not be interpreted merely as the creation of attractive urban spaces for middle-class families. Some studies indicate that urban renewal and family-oriented policies may reproduce social inequalities when they overlook issues such as displacement, affordability, and spatial justice. Therefore, a truly family-friendly city requires an inclusive approach that recognizes diverse family forms and varying socio-economic conditions.ConclusionThis study provides a comprehensive review of the evolution, theoretical foundations, and dimensions of the family-friendly city concept. By integrating bibliometric evidence with qualitative analysis, it develops an interdisciplinary framework that moves beyond fragmented interpretations and presents the family-friendly city as a multidimensional urban planning approach.The results demonstrate that the concept has evolved from a narrow focus on physical facilities and housing toward a broader framework integrating sustainability, livability, inclusion, governance, and social justice. The proposed framework highlights that creating family-friendly cities requires coordinated attention to spatial structures, social relationships, economic opportunities, environmental quality, participatory governance, and the temporal needs of families.However, the dominance of studies from North America and Europe and the limited attention given to cities in the Global South remain important research gaps. Future studies should investigate how cultural, economic, and institutional differences influence the implementation of family-friendly urban policies across diverse urban contexts. Overall, the family-friendly city approach provides a valuable conceptual foundation for developing more inclusive, sustainable, and livable urban environments that support families across different stages of life.
Urban Planning
Erfaneh Ghanbari; Mehrnaz Molavi; Saber Mohammadpour; Sahand Lotfi
Abstract
HighlightsConceptual Innovation: Reconceptualizes consensus as an independent, multidimensional phenomenon in urban planning through rigorous inductive thematic analysis.Core Thematic Identification: Defines six foundational pillars: facilitated participatory processes, stakeholder engagement, discourse ...
Read More
HighlightsConceptual Innovation: Reconceptualizes consensus as an independent, multidimensional phenomenon in urban planning through rigorous inductive thematic analysis.Core Thematic Identification: Defines six foundational pillars: facilitated participatory processes, stakeholder engagement, discourse and communicative action, conflict management, power dynamics, and adaptive management.Operational Framework: Proposes an integrated, dynamic conceptual model designed to guide planners and stakeholders through complex, multi-scalar urban decision-making.Process-Oriented Approach: Emphasizes continuous feedback loops, adaptive learning, and iterative interaction as essential mechanisms for sustainable planning outcomes. IntroductionThe contemporary urban landscape is defined by profound economic, social, and political transformations, which often exacerbate conflicting values and competing stakeholder interests. Consequently, urban planning approaches have shifted toward consensus-building as a necessary strategy for reconciling these differences and achieving collective goals. Consensus serves as a critical mechanism for establishing shared objectives and fostering the mutual understanding essential for successful policy implementation. In the absence of consensus, urban plans risk overlooking diverse perspectives, which often leads to implementation failure, deepening social inequalities, and a decline in institutional trust.Despite the acknowledged importance of consensus since the shift from technocratic to pluralistic planning in the 1970s, it remains a conceptually underdeveloped area in planning theory. Existing literature often treats consensus as a subordinate component of conflict resolution rather than a distinct, multidimensional concept. This study addresses this scholarly gap by identifying the primary organizing themes of consensus and proposing a robust conceptual model for urban planning. The paper further examines the complex, dialectical interactions between these themes to illustrate how they collectively facilitate consensus formation in urban governance.Theoretical FrameworkConsensus, in both classical and contemporary discourse, is understood as a form of social and political interconnectivity that fosters fair convergence toward common interests across various scales—from global to hyper-local. Within urban planning, this phenomenon is particularly critical at the meso (regional) and micro (neighborhood/local community) levels.This research draws upon an interdisciplinary theoretical foundation, integrating Habermas’s “Communicative Action Theory,” Lefebvre’s “Right to the City,” contemporary “Pluralism,” Foucault’s critical perspective on “Power,” and “Complexity Theory.” These theoretical lenses provide the necessary depth to analyze the multidimensionality of consensus. Following scholars like Neves (2016), we define consensus not as a static or forced agreement, but as a gradual, deliberative, and non-coercive process. In this view, active collaboration among all stakeholders is imperative, ensuring that outcomes not only satisfy mutual needs but also cultivate long-term trust and social cohesion. By mapping the obstacles that frequently undermine these processes, this study provides a comprehensive overview of the tensions inherent in seeking collective harmony.MethodologyThis study employs a systematic qualitative thematic analysis, utilizing an inductive, bottom-up approach to extract insights from the literature. The analytical process involved manual coding of extensive scholarly texts until theoretical saturation was reached. Through this iterative process, initial codes were categorized into sub-themes, which subsequently coalesced into six overarching “organizing themes of consensus in planning.” To ensure methodological robustness, these themes were validated through theoretical triangulation and cross-referenced with established empirical studies. The internal linkages and interdependencies among these themes were then synthesized to construct a unified, operational conceptual model for achieving consensus in real-world planning practice.Results and DiscussionThe thematic analysis identified six core dimensions: “facilitated participatory process,” “stakeholders and actors,” “discourse and communicative action,” “conflict management,” “power relations and dynamics,” and “adaptive management.” These themes are deeply interrelated, forming a symbiotic system where the failure of one component can destabilize the entire consensus-building process.The validity of these themes is firmly grounded in the aforementioned theories (Habermas, Lefebvre, Foucault, etc.). The study demonstrates that consensus is a systemic outcome of these six pillars working in concert. For instance, without a critical understanding of power relations, discourse often fails to be truly communicative, and conflict management becomes merely performative rather than transformative.ConclusionThe proposed conceptual model offers a versatile framework for guiding participatory planning across various cultural, political, and legal contexts. By proactively addressing conflict through the lens of power and dialogue, the model facilitates more equitable and sustainable outcomes. Our findings suggest that successful consensus requires an integrated approach where “facilitated participation” acts as the vessel for “stakeholder engagement,” while “communicative action” and “power awareness” serve as the diagnostic tools for identifying and resolving core conflicts. Finally, “adaptive management” ensures that policies remain resilient through continuous monitoring and learning. While this model provides a strong theoretical and practical contribution to contemporary planning, it also acknowledges the inherent practical limitations of consensus-building in highly fragmented urban environments. Future research should focus on applying this model to diverse case studies to further refine its empirical application.
Urban Planning
mitra azimi; mohsen afshari
Abstract
HighlightsDespite the implementation of more than 18 development projects, citizenship education in Harandi has not received sufficient attention.Planners often prioritized physical infrastructure over educational empowerment, weakening long-term social sustainability.For neighborhoods such as Harandi—characterized ...
Read More
HighlightsDespite the implementation of more than 18 development projects, citizenship education in Harandi has not received sufficient attention.Planners often prioritized physical infrastructure over educational empowerment, weakening long-term social sustainability.For neighborhoods such as Harandi—characterized by multiple social and physical vulnerabilities—citizenship education is an inevitable necessity for sustainable local development.Extended Abstract IntroductionThe Harandi neighborhood, located on the southern threshold of Tehran near the Cave and Customs Gates, holds both historical and strategic significance within the city’s urban network. Yet, it is simultaneously regarded as one of the main centers of social harm and deprivation. Over the past two decades, municipal authorities have attempted to address its challenges through the preparation and implementation of more than 18 development projects.Despite these efforts, the neighborhood continues to suffer from deep-rooted problems such as drug abuse, poverty, unemployment, and marginalization. While physical and infrastructural projects have been extensively emphasized, the non-material dimensions of development—particularly citizenship education—have remained underexplored. This imbalance has limited the sustainability and long-term effectiveness of the implemented projects.Accordingly, this study investigates the position of citizenship education in Harandi’s development projects, guided by three central questions:What role does citizenship education occupy in Harandi’s development plans?What are the key indicators of citizenship education at the neighborhood level?What strategies can strengthen the position of citizenship education within future urban development programs? Theoretical FrameworkCitizenship education is widely recognized as a process through which individuals develop the knowledge, values, and skills required to engage constructively in society. From a democratic perspective, it is a cornerstone of building social capital, enhancing civic participation, and ensuring long-term urban sustainability.The literature highlights six interrelated dimensions of citizenship education:Legalism – awareness and compliance with laws and regulations;Patriotism and collective responsibility – cultivating loyalty and attachment to the nation and neighborhood;Respect for beliefs, minorities, and customs – fostering tolerance and cultural inclusiveness;Responsibility – encouraging active commitment to personal and collective duties;Civic awareness – understanding social rights, responsibilities, and public affairs;Participation – promoting active involvement in decision-making and community improvement.Democratic theories stress that citizens should be educated not only about their rights but also about their obligations, enabling them to contribute actively to society. In neighborhoods with high levels of vulnerability, such as Harandi, these dimensions are particularly vital, as they can mitigate social harms and empower residents to engage in positive and constructive behaviors. MethodologyThis study is qualitative in nature and employs a multi-step research strategy. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with three groups: neighborhood mayors, members of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) active in Harandi, and urban studies experts. Five participants were selected purposefully from each group, yielding a total of 15 interviews.Thematic saturation was achieved with this number of participants. Data were analyzed using coding techniques in MAXQDA software, allowing for the identification of recurrent themes, patterns, and gaps in citizenship education within existing development plans. Document analysis of 18 neighborhood projects further complemented the interview findings, offering a comprehensive picture of planning practices in Harandi. Results and DiscussionThe findings reveal a significant gap between the stated objectives of Harandi’s development plans and their actual implementation.Among the six indicators of citizenship education, civic awareness and participation were relatively more emphasized in official documents. For instance, some plans included provisions for community workshops or participatory decision-making sessions.However, critical components such as respect for beliefs and cultural diversity and legalism received minimal attention. This neglect has arguably reinforced cycles of distrust between residents and institutions, further exacerbating social harms.Indicators such as patriotism and responsibility were superficially mentioned but rarely operationalized in concrete programs.Interviewees, particularly municipal managers, acknowledged that physical improvements (e.g., road construction, façade rehabilitation, park creation) were prioritized over educational empowerment. NGO representatives emphasized that without strengthening civic responsibility and awareness of rights, infrastructural interventions alone cannot ensure sustainable transformation.Comparative analysis of the 18 plans shows that those with modest educational components achieved relatively better outcomes in terms of community acceptance and participation. For example, initiatives involving local NGOs in training sessions for youth and women demonstrated higher levels of trust-building compared to purely physical projects.These findings resonate with global research indicating that development projects in marginalized areas fail when social empowerment and citizenship education are overlooked. Scholars such as Banks and Holston have shown that without civic inclusion, physical regeneration often leads to displacement or deepened inequality. ConclusionThe study highlights the critical role of citizenship education in the sustainable regeneration of socially vulnerable neighborhoods such as Harandi. Based on the analysis, six major contributions of citizenship education to local development can be identified:Strengthening responsibility: Encouraging residents to take responsibility for their environment and community well-being.Increasing participation: Enabling active engagement in civic and political affairs, thereby fostering collaborative governance.Reducing social harms: Empowering individuals with knowledge of rights and responsibilities, which can reduce behaviors linked to addiction, violence, and marginalization.Enhancing solidarity: Promoting mutual trust and cooperation among residents, reducing social fragmentation.Raising legal awareness: Informing citizens of their rights and responsibilities under the law, thus improving compliance and social justice.Empowering communities: Building local capacity to collectively address neighborhood problems and influence urban policy.In summary, the neglect of citizenship education in Harandi’s past development projects has limited their effectiveness. Future planning must integrate educational empowerment alongside physical interventions, ensuring that residents are equipped not only with better infrastructure but also with the civic skills and awareness required for sustainable neighborhood transformation.
Urban Planning
Bahador Zamani; Ehsan Babaei Salanghooch
Abstract
Highlights
High-quality grounded theory methodology (GTM) research in urban planning and design requires a deep understanding of GTM’s nature, versions, characteristics, and core principles.
Lack of adherence to all GTM principles can hinder the primary goal of GTM: theory generation.
Many ...
Read More
Highlights
High-quality grounded theory methodology (GTM) research in urban planning and design requires a deep understanding of GTM’s nature, versions, characteristics, and core principles.
Lack of adherence to all GTM principles can hinder the primary goal of GTM: theory generation.
Many GTM studies reviewed in this paper could have applied a more accurate version of GTM.
GTM research in urban planning and design should clearly present evidence of key actions taken during data collection and analysis.
Introduction
In recent years, grounded theory methodology (GTM) has become more prevalent in research fields related to the built environment, especially urban planning and design. However, a lack of thorough understanding of GTM’s foundational principles and versions has often led to research with eclectic interpretations of GTM, sometimes diverging from GTM’s fundamental aims and processes. This study systematically evaluates GTM-based research in urban planning and design, aiming to understand the adherence to GTM’s essential principles within these studies and to provide recommendations for future research.
Theoretical Framework
GTM has evolved significantly since its inception by Glaser and Strauss, with various adaptations. Early on, Leonard Schatzman’s development of dimensional analysis marked a significant shift (Schatzman 1991). Kathy Charmaz, a student of both founders, advanced constructivist grounded theory. Adele Clarke, another prominent figure in GTM’s development, integrated Strauss’s social worlds and arenas framework with situational analysis (Clarke 2005; Clarke et al. 2018). Numerous other adaptations have since emerged, including critical realist GTM (Oliver 2011), transformational GTM (Redman-MacLaren and Mills 2015), multi-grounded theory (Goldkuhl and Cronholm 2010), and feminist GTM (Wuest 1995). Despite these variations, GTM’s core principles remain central across adaptations, including simultaneous data collection and analysis, data coding, constant comparison, theoretical sampling, theoretical saturation, memo writing, and integrating the theoretical framework within existing literature (Charmaz 2014; Corbin and Strauss 2014).
Methodology
This study conducted a systematic review across Persian-language scientific databases, including the Jahad Daneshgahi Scientific Information Center, the Comprehensive Humanities Portal, and Noor Specialized Journals, encompassing a broad range of fields like art, architecture, and social sciences. The search yielded 834 articles, of which duplicate and non-peer-reviewed articles were excluded. Studies were further narrowed down to those authored by urban planning professionals or featuring urban planning participants, specifically employing GTM as the sole research method or methodology. Articles from other disciplines, such as architecture and tourism, were excluded. Inclusion criteria focused on Persian-language articles published between 1967 (the year GTM was introduced) and 2020, specifically on urban design and planning and explicitly using GTM.
Descriptive characteristics, including author(s), publication year, purpose, data collection methods, applied GTM version, and role of GTM in the research, were extracted for analysis. This assessment was based on the quality guideline by Hutchinson et al. (2011).
Results
Out of the reviewed studies, 32 (73%) justified their use of GTM. GTM’s role varied:
1 study (2%) described GTM as a methodology
32 studies (73%) as a method
12 studies (29%) as an approach
5 studies (11%) as an approach (repeated category)
2 studies (5%) as a data analysis tool Four studies (11%) referenced GTM without specifying its methodological role.
Regarding GTM versions used:
8 studies (18%) did not specify a version
29 studies (66%) used the Strauss and Corbin version
2 studies (5%) used Charmaz’s constructivist version
1 study (2%) referenced Glaser’s approach
1 study (2%) referenced Clarke’s situational analysis
3 studies (7%) used a combination of versions.
In terms of adherence to GTM principles, studies showed varied application levels. Only one study applied all seven GTM principles. Other studies used between one to six principles, with one study applying none. For outcomes:
7 studies (16%) achieved theory generation
6 studies (14%) presented descriptive themes and narratives
29 studies (67%) used diagrams or models
1 study (2%) presented a conceptual framework
1 study (2%) reported a paradigm model.
Overall, this evaluation indicated that while GTM is increasingly used in urban planning and design research, many studies have not fully applied GTM’s principles. Consequently, their outputs often consist of descriptive themes or diagrams rather than theoretical contributions. Some studies applied only select GTM techniques, such as coding, without employing processes like theoretical sampling and constant comparison, limiting them to descriptive results rather than theory building.
Conclusion
This study’s findings indicate that to improve GTM research quality in urban planning and design, researchers must thoroughly understand GTM’s nature, versions, and core principles. A deep comprehension of different GTM versions allows for selecting the most suitable approach for the research’s goals and objectives, ensuring robust theory generation.
Urban GIS
Amir Baghban; sajedeh baghban khiabani; Mozhgan Sabet Teimouri
Abstract
Highlights
- Mashhad’s urban inefficiency problem follows a clustering pattern.
- The increase in informal settlements on the outskirts of Mashhad is due to microlithic structures and impenetrable textures.
- The G_i statistic highlights the location of cold clusters with lower inefficiency ...
Read More
Highlights
- Mashhad’s urban inefficiency problem follows a clustering pattern.
- The increase in informal settlements on the outskirts of Mashhad is due to microlithic structures and impenetrable textures.
- The G_i statistic highlights the location of cold clusters with lower inefficiency in the pilgrimage area.
- Small rented and unstable buildings exert a stronger influence on the inefficiency of structures than other factors.
1-Introduction
Cities are dynamic systems, constantly evolving under the influence of social, cultural, economic, and political factors. Urban inefficiencies, particularly in certain textures, pose significant challenges to urban planners. Inefficient urban textures represent areas where physical, functional, and social quality are severely lacking. These textures, often formed over long periods, fail to meet the needs of their residents. The city of Mashhad, Iran’s second-largest metropolis, encompasses 6688 hectares of inefficient textures. These areas are marked by inadequate housing, inconsistent land use, and poor infrastructure, among other challenges, leading to a low quality of life for residents. This imbalance in physical development and population settlement poses numerous challenges. Hence, evaluating the vulnerability and inefficiency of these textures is critical. This study aims to investigate the spatial patterns of inefficiency in Mashhad's urban textures.
2-Theoretical Framework
Inefficient urban textures are sections of a city where infrastructure, buildings, streets, and other components become ineffective, causing a range of socio-economic and physical problems for residents. These inefficient urban areas can be categorized into five types:
2-1-Informal settlements: Primarily house rural migrants and the urban poor.
2-2-Middle inefficient (worn-out) textures: Parts of the city developed after the 1300s without adherence to architectural or urban planning standards.
2-3-Historical city textures: These sections hold historical value in urban planning and architecture but are now inefficient.
2-4-Urban areas with a rural background: Areas within the city that have not integrated with the broader urban fabric.
2-5-Areas with incompatible urban use: Locations where the current usage contradicts urban planning needs.
Understanding the development of these textures is crucial for assessing their inefficiency and the urban planning interventions required to address them.
3-Methodology
The study employed a descriptive-analytical approach, gathering data through extensive library research and literature reviews. The study area consisted of 6688 hectares of inefficient textures in Mashhad. To assess the level of inefficiency in these areas, the WSUM (Weighted Sum) technique was employed. Further spatial analysis was conducted using ArcGIS software, with a particular focus on spatial self-dependency patterns, analyzed through models like the Global Moran Model and the G_i statistic. Geographically weighted regression (GWR) was then used to model the spatial relationships between different factors contributing to urban inefficiency.
4-Results and Discussion
The results showed that informal settlements and marginal areas of Mashhad are more inefficient compared to the middle and central parts of the city. Analyzing the spatial pattern of inefficiency using the Global Moran method and G_i statistics revealed that the inefficiencies follow a cluster pattern. The Global Moran method produced a positive score of 0.1, with a z-score of 68.26 at a significance level of 99%. This indicates a significant clustering of inefficient textures.
Further analysis with the G_i statistic showed a G value of 0.000120 and a z-score of 19.14, confirming a high-concentration clustering pattern of inefficiency. The spatial correlation analysis revealed that hot spots (high-concentration clusters) are located in the eastern, southeastern, and northwestern parts of the city, where informal settlements dominate. In contrast, cold spots (areas of low inefficiency) were concentrated in the central parts of the city, including the pilgrimage area. The spatial patterns in other parts of the city showed little or no significant clustering.
The geographically weighted regression (GWR) model revealed that microlithic buildings, rented housing, and unstable structures have a greater impact on the inefficiency of urban textures than other variables. The combination of spatial patterns and socio-economic factors suggests that the areas of Mashhad most in need of intervention are informal settlements and marginal areas.
5-Conclusion
While most studies on inefficient urban textures have utilized multi-criteria decision-making methods or statistical tests, few have focused on spatial analysis. This study introduced a new approach to understanding urban inefficiency by combining WSUM, Moran’s global method, and the G_i statistic to assess spatial patterns. The findings highlight the severe inefficiency in Mashhad’s informal and marginal areas compared to central areas.
Hot spots of inefficiency are concentrated in informal settlements on the city’s eastern, northeastern, and northwestern margins, creating a cluster pattern of inefficiency. In contrast, the pilgrimage area and central parts of the city show fewer inefficiencies. The GWR model further emphasized that unstable buildings and rented houses are key drivers of inefficiency in these areas.
The study underscores the importance of spatially targeted interventions, especially in informal settlements and marginal areas. Given the diverse types of inefficiencies across the city, urban planners must adopt differentiated strategies when addressing various forms of urban inefficiency. Addressing these issues in informal settlements should be a priority to improve the overall quality of life and urban function in Mashhad.
Urban Planning
m s; j t; m ch
Volume 3, Issue 12 , November 2014, , Pages 19-32
Abstract
Despite the fundamental economic, social, political and technological transformations, urban planning process has not undergone any sensible change since 1968 to the present time and the role and position of planners and its prominent actor, i.e. the government, have remained invariant. A major part ...
Read More
Despite the fundamental economic, social, political and technological transformations, urban planning process has not undergone any sensible change since 1968 to the present time and the role and position of planners and its prominent actor, i.e. the government, have remained invariant. A major part of this change has resulted from the viewpoint held by planners who see the planning process as a technical, physical and intellectual process. In the present study, using concepts such as “knowledge”, “reality”, “rationality”, “value”, and “policy” an attempt has been made to criticize the traditional planning process, which is the dominant process in Iran. This study, by introducing other alternatives of scientific knowledge and instrumental rationality and exhibiting some gaps in the robust framework of the reality emphasized in traditional planning, addresses the role of values, experience, and mentality of planners as well as policy and policy implementation employed by social activists in the planning process. Furthermore, it reviews the unbiased and value-free perceptions of traditional values. For this purpose, through interviewing the managing directors of the country’s largest consulting engineering companies, which are in charge of preparing designs in Iran, we have investigated their various mentalities, perceptions, and experiences about the forces and approaches influencing the planning process. The reason why we have chosen company directors instead of project managers or design experts is that directors are more involved in the interactions with different actors in the planning process. After conducting the interviews with 15 managing directors, the contents of the interviews were scripted and the results were applied to review the framework of traditional planning process. Since government, in contrast to society, holds all the powers and fulfills all the duties and is involved in almost all urban planning processes, by drawing five abstract states of planners’ positions (governmental planners, government-serving planners, independent planners, public-serving planners, and public planners) we have assumed that there is a distance between the two main sides of society (government and community) where planners find an angled position with these two elements of society. By defining this position, planners in the planning process determine their relations with each of the primary forces where the smaller the angle, the closer the relationships.
Urban Planning
Volume 2, Issue 5 , March 2013, , Pages 27-34
Abstract
Nowadays, a special attention is given to the role of urban planning and the built environment and their impacts on neighborhood walkability and residents’ walking behavior. A large number of studies have been conducted about this issue in developed countries, but little has been done in this ...
Read More
Nowadays, a special attention is given to the role of urban planning and the built environment and their impacts on neighborhood walkability and residents’ walking behavior. A large number of studies have been conducted about this issue in developed countries, but little has been done in this regard in the context of a developing country such as Iran. These researches emphasized the strong relation between accessibility to parks, recreational and sport services. They applied two main approaches of objective and subjective. The objective criterion has some advantages like lesser measurement error, standardization and easy quantification and transferability into policy making. Some researchers believe that subjective approaches have more affinities with real perceptions especially in behavioral sciences. Thus, a considerable number of researchers recommend the use of both objective and subjective approaches. Evidence showed that the dimension of physical problems is more sophisticated in larger urban centers. Tehran mega-polis as capital center of Iran experiences a wide range of socio-economic problems due to the rising level of air pollution. According to the official records of heath organizations, obesity and heart diseases are on the increase among the population of large urban centers. Therefore, it seems that physical activity can partly help reduce the pressure of different physical and mental disorders. Obviously, urban planners play a significant role in carrying out the arrangement of urban land use on different scales from city to neighborhood. The present study examined the relationship between neighborhood walkability and adults’ walking behavior in Metropolitan Tehran. Three built environment measures of net residential density, land-use mix, street connectivity, and socio-economic status (SES) were calculated using geographic information systems (GIS) on a census block scale across Metropolitan Tehran. As participants, 657 subjects were recruited from neighboring areas in terms of both neighborhood walkability and SES scores. The amount of weekly walking was obtained using a self-reported method and, then, it was compared with the neighborhood walkability. The data were processed and classified using SPSS and anylsed via different statistical models. The results of this study showed that there was a significant relationship between the neighborhood walkability and residents’ walking behavior. People who lived in high walkable neighborhoods reported more weekly walking than those who lived in low walkable neighborhoods. These results highlighted the role of urban planning and the built environment in enhancing residents’ physical activity which, in turn, leads to the improvement of residents’ physical and mental health. The main conclusion of this research was that the method and measurement of physical activities in urban areas has definite connection with the socio-economic conditions of people. Thus, urban researchers need to employ social and economic indexes to identify the real requirements of urban neighborhoods and facilities to help members of society, especially the older people, to take part in physical activities. This research, however, recommended further studies in this regard to deepen our understanding about the relation between the features of built environment and the tendency of residents towards more physical activity.
Urban Sustainability
Volume 2, Issue 5 , March 2013, , Pages 35-46
Abstract
The relationship between public health and urban planning is an innovative and important issue which enjoys a prominent position in the future urban planning. In this regard, ad -verse air quality condition and air pollutant concentrations higher than the permitted limit set by the World Health Organization ...
Read More
The relationship between public health and urban planning is an innovative and important issue which enjoys a prominent position in the future urban planning. In this regard, ad -verse air quality condition and air pollutant concentrations higher than the permitted limit set by the World Health Organization are considered as a threat to the health of citizens in big cities. According to result of air pollution monitoring (conducted in the Tehran Air Quality Control Company), Tehran air quality has deteriorated in recent years. Likewise, according to the World Bank estimates, the annual economic value of losses of life and damage caused by air pollution in Iran is totaled $ 1.8 billion and Tehran residents’ life-time has on average become shorter by 5 years. Owing to the special geographical condi -tion (topography and meteorology), social (population distribution and traffic), culture (level of culture and related education) and urban development, Tehran metropolitan is faced with the dilemma of air pollution. It is necessary to mention that motor-vehicle emissions are the primary source of most fine and ultra- fine particles in Tehran (More than 70 percent of Tehran’s air pollution is related to motor-vehicle emissions). Both urban air quality as an influential factor in public health and neighborhoods walkability as another important feature of urban built environment are considered in this paper. It should be noted that a large part of the current metropolitan air pollution is caused by emissions from the urban transport sector; thus representing the importance of public and sustainable urban transport. Having this in mind, this study focuses on capability of neighborhoods walkability as a long-term and effective strategy to promote walking trips and improve ur-ban air quality. In this research, the average annual concentrations (in years 2010-2011) of Ozone (O3), Nitric oxide (NO), Carbon monoxide (CO), Particulate matter (PM10), and capability of neighborhoods walkability in fourteen areas around air quality monitoring stations are studied. To estimate the capability of walkability, the 2009 model proposed by Marshal and his colleagues is utilized with slight modification. Measures that are used in the equation include net residential density, intersection density, land-use mix, retail units density and average distance from public transport stations. In the next step, cor-relations between them are calculated using correlation and regression models along with spatial analysis in relation to distance from city centers. These data were analyzed and calculated in ArcMap software. In addition, city centers were determined based on Tehran master plan approved in 2007. Research pinpoint the concentration of primary pollutants, capabilities of neighborhoods walkability increase in adjacent areas of city center and the concentration of secondary pollutant O3 increase with distance from city center. Capabil -ity of neighborhoods walkability and concentration of Ozone (O3) and PM10 were also correlated with each other. In addition, the highest walkability area was observed in sur -rounding area of Golbarg, region 4 and 7 stations and surrounding areas of Pasdaran and Ostandari stations were the most polluted among the others areas.
