ISSN: 2717-4417

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

Perception of urban space is the first step in communicating with the environment. This perception leads to the formation of an image of city and thus a person’s cognitive map of space. The age group, sex, as well as the level of the familiarity of an individual with the environment have a significant effect on shaping this process. In fact, perception occurs when it affects human senses. Therefore, the more distinct the urban spaces are, the more complete can be the picture formed in the minds of people. It should be noted that people of different ages have different expectations of space and remember the urban space accordingly. Therefore, it can generally be said that a more perceptible and easy-to-understand environment can be grasped easier and a more complete picture of its structure can be shaped in people’s minds.
By analyzing citizens’ cognitive maps and deducing their perceptual similarities, one can measure how the legibility of an environment influences the cognitive perception of adults of different ages. This article seeks to achieve this goal with the aim of creating a legible urban space for adults. Data collection methods in this study include: literature review, descriptive statistics, and cognitive mapping technique. The library method was used to formulate research background, theoretical principles and research framework. Field methods, questionnaires, cognitive maps and routing techniques were used to understand the cognitive perception of adults of different ages and to recognize perceptual similarities with respect to the indicators defined in the theoretical framework. In fact, with this technique, one can deduce perceptual similarities by using cognitive maps and studying the presence of five elements of Lynch – i.e. landmark, path, node, edge, district and range – in cognitive maps drawn by individuals of 15-28, 29-40, 41-52, and 53-64 years age groups. Chi-square test was used to determine the relationships between variables. The target group of the study is also 15-64 year old individuals who are either residents, businessmen or users of the environment. The sample size was calculated using Cochran’s formula to be 132 individuals.
The findings of this study suggest that cognitive similarities between adults in the 15-64 years age group are more affected by node and landmarks, and that other Lynch elements do not play a role in shaping the adult mental image of the study environment. Also, easy routing by people in urban spaces is not only affected by order, symmetry, complexity, and guidance signs in the environment. Cognitive maps also show that the vast majority of adults have mapped the environment based on sequential order according to Appelard classification. It should be noted that there is a direct relationship between elements of the environment and its readability for adults of different ages. Studies on readability of the node element also show that the activity alone cannot cause spatial differentiation and legibility of the node. Also, the façade and elevation of buildings alone cannot enhance the visibility and legibility of an edge.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  •  

    • Appleyard,Donuld(1978).styles and methods of structuring a city,human scape environments for people,mass Duxbury,page:79-80.
    • Atallah,joelle(2011)perceptions of public transportation with a focus on older adults,thesis for the Degree Master of Fine Arts,Graduate School of The Ohio State University.
    • Bentley,I yen(2003).Responsive environment(Behzadfar,Mostafa).Elam va Sanat university. [in Persian]
    • Borella,Erika.Meneghetti,chaira(2012).Age differences in environment route learning: The role of input and recall-test modalities in young and older adults, journal of Elsevier,volume7,page7.
    • Burton,Elizabeth,Mitchell,Lynne(2011).Inclusive urban design,streets for life (Zabetian,Elham.Moghimi,Fatemeh).Atak,Tehran. [in Persian]
    • Damayanti,Rully.Florian,kossak(2013).rethinking of lynch:a study of young people perception of Surabaya city,journal of architecture and built environment,volume40,page 27-32.
    • Eraydin,zeynep(2007).building a legible city:how far planning is successful in Ankara,a thesis submitted for degree of master of science,urban design,city and regional planning of middle east technical university.
    • Erem,O.Sener,G.E(2008).Complexity versus sustainability in urban space: The case of Taksim Square. journal of Istanbul,volume1,page 54-73.
    • Habib,Farah.Sashourpour,Mahdi(2012). The Cognition of the City at Night,Investigating the Role of the Night in Citizens Cognitive Maps- Case Studies: Zanjan and Abadan,International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development,volume2.
    • Kaplan,R.Kaplan,S(1998).With People in Mind: Design And Management Of Everyday Nature. Publisher Island Press.
    • Khazravi,Ali.Karimipour,Farid(2012).Cognitive Readability Enhancing of Cartographic Maps for Pedestrian Navigation,International Journal of Brain and Cognitive Sciences,volume1.
    • Kim,Y(1999).Spatial configuration,spatial cognition and spatial behaviour:The role of architectural intelligibility in shaping spatial experience,A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy,Architecture,University of London.
    • Kuipers,B.Levit,T.S(1990).Navigation and Mapping in Large-scale Space,in Advances in Spatial Reasoning,journal of Elsevier,volume 119,page: 191-233.
    • Kitchin,R(1994).Cognitive maps: What are they and why study them,journal of Environmental Psychology,volume14.
    • Kitchin,R.golledge,R.Jackobson,D.Blade,M(2000).Cognitive Maps,Spatial Abilities and Human Wayfinding. Final Report"Understanding Geographic Space Without the Use of Vision"is available on line at http://fsu.edu~geog/jacobson/nsf-und/nsf.html.
    • Lang,jan(2002).Creation of architectural theory: The role of behavioral science in environmental design(Eynifar,Alireza). university of Tehran. [in Persian]
    • Long, Yixiang(2007).The Relationships Between Objective and Subjective Evaluation of the Urban Environment: Space Syntax,Cognitive Maps and Urban Legibility,A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy,design Raleigh,North Carolina State University.
    • Lotfabadi,Hossein(2001).Development Psychology volum2. adolescence, youth, adults, Publishers : Samt,Tehran. [in Persian]
    • Lynch,Kevin(2004).Image of city,(Mozayani,Manuchehr).university of Tehran.
    • Mahdzar,Sharifah.Safari,Hossein(2014).Legibility as a Result of Geometry Space: Analyzing and Comparing Hypothetical Model and Existing Space by Space, Journal of Life Science,volume8.
    • Negro,D.Del(2003).The Perception of Central London by Night. UCL Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, London, United Kingdom.
    • Neisser,U(1976).Cognition and Reality,San Francisco: W.H Freeman.
    • Omranipour,Ali.Mohamadmoradi,Asghar(2011).Analysis of the environmental characteristics of personality theory ericsson,Armanshahr journal,volume7,page:6-9.[in Persian]
    • Onder,Erinsel.Gigi,Yildirim(2010).Reading urban spaces by the space-syntax method: A proposal for the South Halic Region,journal of Elsevier cities,volume27,page 260-271.
    • Pakzad,Jahanshah.Bozorg,Hamideh(2014).An introduction to environmental psychology for designers,Armanshahr,Tehran. [in Persian]
    • Paydar,Mohammad.Said,Ismail(2012).Commuters’ Perception of Legibility and Complexity with Respect to Path Choice in Central Business District of Kuala Lumpur,international transaction journal of engineering management,volume3.
    • Savage,Victor.Henry,Chung(1996).urban imagery and the main street of the nation: the legibility of orchard road in the eyes of singaporeans,journal of urban studies,volume33, page473-494.
    • Shokouhi,Mahshid(2010).Legible cities,The role of visual clues and pathway configuration in legibility of cities,4th International Space Syntax Symposium,London 2003.
    • Sho'le,Mahsa(2011).Underlines the city and its analysis methodology and criteria text,Honarhaye Ziba journal,volume48,page:2.[in Persian]
    • Tawfiq,M.Abu-Ghazzeh(1998).Movement and wayfinding in the king saud university built, environment: a look at freshman orientation and environmental information,journal of Environmental Psychology,volume16,page 303–318.
    • Thompson,Travlou(2007).Open Space,People Space,An international conference on innovative approaches to research excellence in landscape and health,Edinburgh.
    • Tolman,Edward(1948).Cognitive Maps in Rats And Men,journal of psychological review,volume55,page: 189-208
    • Zengin,Hayat.Erdogan,Ahu(2013).an alternative approach in reading the urban space: izmir-historic city center,journal of art and design,volume3,page 141-154.