Re-examining the ontology of new urban neighborhoods on the basis of the social dimensions of traditional neighborhoods

Shams, Fatemeh; Pourjafar, Mohammad Reza; Khatami, Seyed Mahdi; Soltani, Ali

doi:10.22034/urbs.2024.141272.5046

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

¹ Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art & Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

² Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art & Architecture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

10.22034/urbs.2024.141272.5046

Abstract

Highlights
- The prevailing understanding of neighborhoods has lacked a dialectical perspective and has been devoid of social and semantic layers.
- Over time, the concept of a neighborhood has evolved from a purely physical entity to a more complex semantic, perceptual, and mental construct.
- The traditional neighborhood, as an identifiable civic entity, comprises four key elements: space, time, citizen, and activity.
- Revisiting the core themes of the social ontology of traditional neighborhoods can contribute to the revitalization of contemporary urban neighborhoods.
- The social capacities and sociability of a neighborhood form the fundamental themes of the social ontology of traditional neighborhoods.
Introduction
Over the past decades, numerous discussions have attempted to define the concept of a neighborhood. Initially, the definition of a neighborhood was rooted in the principle of separation, emphasizing the presence of social boundaries. However, as urban development advanced, the transformation of neighborhoods in the modern era signaled the emergence of new conceptualizations, where planning and design often preceded social structures.
Despite extensive academic discourse, a universally accepted definition of a neighborhood remains elusive. Examining the spatial aspects of neighborhoods requires a well-defined theoretical framework that captures the lived experiences of residents and the interrelationship between people, activities, and spaces. The ambiguity in defining neighborhoods stems from the absence of a standardized conceptual framework, resulting in varied interpretations and applications across disciplines. This challenge has hindered the ability of urban scholars to fully grasp the implications of neighborhood effects on social interactions and urban cohesion.
Theoretical Framework
Neighborhoods have long been a focal point of social science research. Sociologists have regarded neighborhoods as "genuine phenomena" with intrinsic social significance. The scientific study of neighborhoods as independent subjects gained traction in the late 19th century. By the 1960s, the concept of the neighborhood had gained prominence within professional communities, yet definitions increasingly overlooked its locational aspects.
In the 21st century, social theorists revisited early neighborhood conceptualizations, such as those formulated by the Chicago School, which emphasized demographic characteristics as defining factors. This approach viewed neighborhoods primarily through socio-economic, moral, and racial transformations. However, the perception of neighborhoods gradually shifted from being purely physical constructs to more perceptual and mental entities, characterized by four key dimensions: space, time (history), citizens (individuals, groups, and institutions), and activities or functions.
Historical research suggests that the concept of a neighborhood is best understood as a dynamic and evolving process. The "accumulation of similar behavioral patterns" and a "valued perception of a fixed territory" contribute to the neighborhood's identity. Modernity has introduced additional complexities, reinforcing the importance of reevaluating traditional neighborhood frameworks.
Methodology
This study is classified as fundamental research with a qualitative approach. Utilizing a descriptive-analytical method, it employs a systematic review and thematic analysis technique to analyze 36 primary sources. The research follows a six-step process:
Immersion in the data
Generation of primary codes
Identification of themes
Examination and refinement of themes
Definition and naming of themes
Report preparation
Results and Discussion
The research findings indicate that the social ontology of traditional neighborhoods revolves around two main themes:
Capacities of Local Communities, encompassing:
Social attachment, which includes attitudinal and behavioral attachment, neighborhood satisfaction, emotional investment, preservation of neighborhood assets, social belonging, pride, and the willingness to defend neighborhood boundaries.
Social cohesion, which involves fostering deep interpersonal bonds, shared traditions, community participation, and a collective sense of kinship.
Community Neighborhood Acceptance, comprising:
Social obligations, which include collective goals, participatory social practices, neighborhood honor, tolerance, mutual trust, crisis unity, and resident engagement in shaping the neighborhood’s future.
Public good and empowerment, which pertains to the enhancement of interpersonal resources, skill development, neighborhood loyalty, social support systems, local entrepreneurship, and the sustainability of cultural and economic self-sufficiency.
These thematic elements highlight the critical role of neighborhood sociability in fostering cohesive, resilient, and sustainable urban communities. The study underscores that social attachment and cohesion serve as foundational elements for the vitality of traditional neighborhoods.
Conclusion
This study aimed to reinterpret the concept of the traditional neighborhood and examine its transformation across different historical periods. By exploring the social aspects of traditional neighborhoods, it identified four primary components that shape their ontology: space, time, citizen, and activity. These elements interact dynamically, influencing both urban structure and citizenship practices.
Over time, the understanding of neighborhoods has transitioned from being purely physical constructs to more semantic, perceptual, and mental entities. However, despite this conceptual evolution, neighborhoods remain tangible manifestations of social and spatial dynamics. The increasing divergence between social and physical structures, coupled with enhanced mobility and technological advancements, has complicated the definition and lived experience of neighborhoods in contemporary urban contexts.
The findings suggest that revitalizing urban neighborhoods requires a return to the foundational principles of traditional neighborhood design. By integrating social ontology into modern urban planning, policymakers and designers can cultivate more inclusive, resilient, and sustainable urban environments.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Urban Planning

References

Abdolahi, M., Tavakolinia, J., & Sarrafi, M. (2010). Theoretical study of the concept of neighborhood and its redefinition with emphasis on the conditions of urban neighborhoods of Iran. Human Geography Research, 42(2), 82-103. [in Persian]

Abdolahzade Fard, A., & Shamsoddini, A. (2020). Neighborhood Environmental quality and its role regarding the residents' spiritual and mental health (Case Study of Sang Siyah District, Shiraz Metropolis). Urban Planning Knowledge, 4(2), 95-114. http://doi:10.22124/upk.2020.14650.1307 [in Persian]

Alexander, C. (1977). A Pattern language, towns, buildings, construction, Oxford University Press.

Alalhesabi, M., daneshpour, S. A., & Basiri Mojdehi, R. (2023). Formulation of Place criticism in terms of political economy; scrutinizing the urban-relational. Urban Planning Knowledge, 7(1), 1-27. http://doi:10.22124/upk.2022.19448.1640 [in Persian]

Arefi, M. (2008). Asset-based approaches to community development. Nairobi: UN Habitat.

Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307

Baba, Y., & Austin, M.D. (1989). Neighborhood environmental satisfaction, victimization, and social participation as determinants of perceived neighborhood safety. Environment and Behavior, 21, 763- 780. http://doi:10.1177/0013916589216006

Baffoe, G. (2019). Understanding the neighbourhood concept and its evolution: A review. Environment and Urbanization Asia, 10(2), 393-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0975425319859115

Basiri Mozhdehi, R., Daneshpour, S.A., & Alalhesabi, M. (2020). Redefining the ontology of place as the urban-relational. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 17(90), 5-18. https://doi:10.22034/bagh.2020.202498.4316 [in Persian]

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

BREEAM Communities (2012). Integrating sustainable design into master planning, breeam.org/communities

Brehm, J. M. (2007). Community attachment: The complexity and consequence of the natural environment facet, Springer Science. http://doi.10.1007/s10745-006-9104-3

Brower, S. (1996). Good neighborhoods: A Study of in-town and suburban residential environments. Praeger, West port.

Browning, C.R., & Cagney, K.A. (2003). Moving beyond poverty: neighborhood structure, social processes, and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44(4), 552–571. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519799

Buck, N. (2001). Identifying neighbourhood effects on social exclusion. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2251-2275. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120087153

Bulmer, M. (1984). Institutionalization, diversity, and the rise of sociological research. Chicago and London: The Chicago School of Sociology, ISBN: 9780226080048

Butts, J.A. & Schiraldi, V.N. (2018). Recidivism reconsidered: preserving the community justice mission of community corrections, Harvard Kennedy School, program in criminal justice. Policy and Justice. https://doi.org/10.7916/d8-gky0-5x32

Calthorpe, P., & Duany, A. (2001). The regional city: Planning for the end of sprawl. Washington DC: Island Press.

Chan, J., To, H.P., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 273–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-2118-1

Cheung, C., & Leung, K. (2011). Neighborhood homogeneity and cohesion in sustainable community development. Habitat International, 35(4), 564–572. http://doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.03.004

Chizfahm Daneshmandian, M., & Nejad Ebrahimi, A. (2022). Identifying the Structure of Shiraz Neighborhoods from Atabakan to Qajar Period. Pazhoheshha-ye Bastan Shenasi Iran, 12(33), 357-381. http://doi:10.22084/nb.2021.22921.2232 [in Persian]

Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., et al. (2007). Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological economics, 61(2-3), 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.023

Cramm, J.M., van Dijk, H.M., & Nieboer, A.P. (2013). The importance of neighborhood social cohesion and social capital for the well being of older adults in the community. The Gerontologist, 53(1), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gns052

Crank, J., Giacomazzi, A., & Heck, C. (2003). Fear of crime in a nonurban setting. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31(3), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(03)00006-0

Deng, L. (2011). The external neighborhood effects of low-income housing tax credit projects built by three sectors. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(2), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00536.x

Desmond, S.A., & Kubrin, C.E. (2009). The power of place: immigrant communities and adolescent violence. The Sociological Quarterly 50, 581–607, ISSN 0038-0253

Duque, J. C., Ramos, R., & Suriñach, J. (2007). Supervised regionalization methods: A survey. International Regional Science Review, 30(3), 195-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017607301605

Echeverría, S., Diez-Roux, A.V., Shea, S., Borrell, L. N., & Jackson, S. (2008). Associations of neighborhood problems and neighborhood social cohesion with mental health and health behaviors: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Health & Place, 14(4), 853–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.01.004

ElMorshedy, R., Ibrahim, A., & Kamel, R. (2018). A statistical methodology for the socio-spatial assessment of neighborhood life quality. Cogent Social Sciences, 4:1, 1-42. http://doi:10.1080/23311886.2018.1528702

Erving, C.L., & Hills, O. (2019). Neighborhood social integration and psychological well-being among African Americans and Afro-Caribbe-ans. Race & Social Problems. 11(2):133–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-019-09258-z

Eugene, D.R. (2021). Connectedness to family, school, and neighborhood and adolescents’ internalizing symptoms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12602. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312602

Farajollahzadeh, R., & Salehinia, M. (2021). Redefining place by focusing on the process of creation and explanation of place centrality. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 18(102), 69-82. http://doi:10.22034/bagh.2021.256492.4708 [in Persian]

Fisher, R. (2017). A Nation of neighborhoods: imagining cities, communities, and democracy in postwar America. Journal of American History, 103 (4), 1095–1096.

Forrest, R., & A. Kearns (2001). Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies 38.12, 2125–2143. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43198190

Foster, K.A., & Hipp, J.A. (2011). Defining neighborhood boundaries for social measurement: advancing social work research. Social Work Research, 35(1), 25–35. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42659777

Franzini, L., Taylor, W., Elliott, M.N., Cuccaro, P., et al. (2010). Neighborhood characteristics favorable to outdoor physical activity: disparities by socioeconomic and racial/ethnic composition. Health & Place, 16(2), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.10.009

Frey, W. H., & Dowell, M. (2005). Racial segregation in us metropolitan areas and cities, 1990–2000: patterns, trends, and explanations, Population Studies Center Research Report, 05-573.

Galster, G. (2001). On the nature of neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2111-2124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120087072

Galster, G.C., Quercia, R.G., & Cortes, A. (2000). Identifying neighborhood thresholds: An empirical exploration, Housing Policy Debate, 11(3), 701–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2000.9521383

Garrioch, D., & Peel, M. (2006). Introduction: The social history of urban neighborhoods. Journal of Urban History, 32(5), 663-676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144206287093

Glass, R. (1948). The Social background of a plan: A Study of Middlesbrough. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

Grannis, R. (2009). From the ground up: Translating geography into community through neighbor networks. Princeton University Press.

Harris, R.J., & Longley, P.A. (2002). Creating small area measures of urban deprivation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 34(6), 1073-1093. https://doi.org/10.1068/a34120

Hillery, G. (1955). Definitions of community: Areas of agreement. Rural Sociology, 20, 111-123.

Hipp, J.R. (2007). Income Inequality, Race, and place: Does the distribution of race and class within neighborhoods affect crime rates? Criminology, 45, 665-697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00088

Hipp, J.R., & Perrin, A.J. (2009). The simultaneous effect of social distance and physical distance on the formation of neighborhood ties. City & Community, 8(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2009.01267.x

Hipp, J.R., Faris, R.W., & Boessen, A. (2012). Measuring neighborhood: constructing network neighborhoods. Social Networks 34 (2), 128-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.05.002

Ho, K.C., & Chua, V. (2018). The neighbourhood roots of social cohesion: Notes on an exceptional case of Singapore. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36(2), 290– 312. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417710659

Hunter, A. (1974). Community change: a stochastic analysis of Chicago’s local communities, 1930-60. American Journal of Sociology, 79(4), 923–947. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776350

Hwang, J. (2016). The social construction of a gentrifying neighborhood: Reifying and redefining identity and boundaries in inequality. Urban Affairs Review, 52 (1), 98–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087415570643

Marks, D. F., & Yardley, L. (2004). Content and thematic analysis. In Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology. SAGE Publications, 56-68. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209793

Johnston, R., Propper, C., Sarker, R., et al. (2005). Neighbourhood social capital and neighbourhood effects. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 37(8), 1443-1459. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37222

Jose, P. E., Ryan, N., & Pryor, J. (2012). Does social connectedness promote a greater sense of well‐being in adolescence over time? Journal of research on adolescence, 22(2): 235-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2012.00783.x

Kasarda, J. D., & Janowitz, M. (1974). Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review, 39(3), 328–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094293

Ketabollahi, K., Mirgholami, M., & Shahbazi, Y. (2022). Rethinking the concept of biological health of the contemporary iranian-islamic neighborhood in the post-corona era. The culture of Islamic Architectural and Urbanism, 7 (2), 77- 98. http://doi:10.52547/ciauj.7.2.77 [in Persian]

Keller, S. (1968). The urban neighborhood. New York: Random House.

Kitchen, P., Williams, A., & Chowhan, J. (2012). Sense of community belonging and health in Canada: A Regional Analysis. Soc Indic Res 107, 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9830-9

Kramer, R. (2017). Defensible spaces in Philadelphia: Exploring neighborhood boundaries through spatial analysis. Russell SAGE Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 3(2), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2017.3.2.04

Kubrin, C. E., & Weitzer, R. (2003). New directions in social disorganization theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(4), 374-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427803256238

Latifi, G., & Safari Chabok, N. (2012). Regeneration of neighbourhood new urbanism principles times in Islamic Iranian cities. Motaleat-e Shahri, 2 (8), 3-12 [in Persian]

Lee, B. A., Reardon, S. F., Firebaugh, G., et al. (2008). Beyond the census Tract: patterns and determinants of racial segregation at multiple geographic scales. American Sociological Review, 73(5), 766–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300504

LEED for New Construction (2009). U.S. Green Building Council.

LEED Reference Guide for Neighborhood Development (2013). U.S. Green Building Council.

Legewie, J. (2018). Living on the edge: Neighborhood boundaries and the spatial dynamics of violent crime. Demography. 55(5):1957-1977. http://doi:10.1007/s13524-018-0708-1

Legewie, J., & Schaeffer, M. (2016). Contested boundaries: Explaining where ethnoracial diversity provokes neighborhood conflict. AJS; American Journal of Sociology, 122(1), 125–161. https://doi.org/10.1086/686942

Lenzi, M., Vieno, A., Pastore, M., & Santinello, M. (2013). Neighborhood social connectedness and adolescent civic engagement: An integrative model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.003

Lindström, M., Merlo, J., & Ostergren, P. O. (2003). Social capital and sense of insecurity in the neighbourhood: a population-based multilevel analysis in Malmö, Sweden. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 56(5), 1111–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00114-4

Litman, T. (2008). Creating Safe and Healthy Communities. Environments Journal, 35(3), 21- 43,

Logan, J.R., & Molotch, H. (2007). Urban fortunes, the political economy of place. University of California Press. ISBN: 9780520254282

Lochner, C., Mogotsi, M., du Toit, P. L. et al. (2003). Quality of life in anxiety disorders: a comparison of obsessive-compulsive disorder, social anxiety disorder, and panic disorder. Psychopathology, 36(5), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1159/000073451

MacAllister, I., Johnston, R. J., Pattie, C.J. et al. (2001). Class dealignment and the neighbourhood effect: Miller Revisited. British Journal of Political Science, 31(1), 41–59. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3593275

Mann, P.H. (1954). The Concept of Neighborliness. American Journal of Sociology, 60(2):163. https://doi.org/10.1086/221507

McKenzie, S., Collings, S., Jenkin, G. & River, J. (2018). Masculinity, social connectedness, and mental health: men's diverse patterns of practice. American Journal of Health. 12(5):1247-1261. http://doi:10.1177/1557988318772732

Mohnen, S. M., Völker, B., Flap, H., Subramanian, S. V., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2015). The Influence of social capital on individual health: Is it the neighbourhood or the network? Social Indicators Research, 121(1), 195–214. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24721394

Morenoff, J.D. (2003). Neighborhood mechanisms and the spatial dynamics of birth weight. AJS; American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 976–1017. https://doi.org/10.1086/374405

Parkes, A., Kearns, A., & Atkinson, R. (2002). What makes people dissatisfied with their neighbourhoods? Urban Studies, 39(13), 2413–2438. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43196836

Parsi, H.R. (2002). Shenakhte Mohtavaye Fazaye Shahri. Honarha-ye Ziba, 11 (11), 41- 50. [in Persian]

Pattison, P., & Robins, G. (2002). Neighborhood–based models for social networks. Sociological Methodology, 32(1), 301-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9531.00119

Pourjafar, M., & Pourjafar, A. (2012). Proposed neighborhood model, centered on the mosque and public spaces required in the Iranian-Islamic city. Iranian-Islamic City Studies, 3(10), 15- 24. [in Persian]

Pourjafar, M., & Taghvaea, A. (2002). Me’eyarha-ye Barnamerizi va Tarahi Baft-e Maskooni-e Shahrha, Honare Modares, 1, 11- 21.

Reps, J.W. (1965). The making of urban America: a history of city planning in the United States. Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1wmz3zc

Rezazadeh R., Mohammadi Aydoghmish, F., & Rafieyan, M. (2013). Analysis of the role of Asset-based approach in sustainable community development (Case Study: Imamzadeh Hassan Neighborhood, Tehran), the Scientific Journal of NAZAR Research Center, 10 (25), 67- 76 [in Persian]

Roberto, E. (2022). Spatial boundaries and the local context of residential, 1-28, Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0cb0/4b5d06078f50c0d6c561e67 b4543f26c91ea.pdf

Rollings, K.A., Wells, N.M., & Evans, G.W. (2015). Measuring physical neighborhood quality related to health. Behavioral Sciences, 5(2), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs5020190

Rose, T., McDonald, A., Von Mach, T., Witherspoon, D.P., & Lambert, S. (2019). Patterns of social connectedness and psychosocial wellbeing among African American and Caribbean black adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(11), 2271–2291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01135-7

Sampson, R., & Groves, W.B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802. https://doi.org/10.1086/229068

Sampson, R., & Wilson, W. (1995). Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. Journal of Hagan & R. Peterson (Ed.), Crime and Inequality: Stanford University Press, 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503615557-004

Sampson, R., & Raudenbush, S.W. (2004). Seeing disorder: Neighborhood stigma and the Social construction of “broken windows”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(4), 319-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250406700401

Shaw, C.R., & McKay, H.D. (2010). Encyclopedia of criminological theory social disorganization theory, SAGE Publications, 828-835. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412959193.n228

Schwirian, K.P. (1983). Models of neighborhood change. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 83–102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2946058

Seeman, T.E. (1996). Social ties and health: the benefits of social integration. Annals of epidemiology, 6(5), 442–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1047-2797(96)00095-6

Sheykhi, M. (2003). Neighborhood structure of the past Islamic cities. Social Sciences, 10(22), 39-68 [in Persian]

Silver, D., Clark, T.N., & Yanez, C.J.N. (2010). Scenes: Social context in an age of contingency. Social Forces, 88(5), 2293–2324. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40927547

Simkhovitch, M. (2006). Neighborhood; my story of Greenwich House, New York, Norton. http://urn:oclc:record:1049894805

Smith, M.E. (2010). The archaeological study of neighborhoods and districts in ancient cities. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 29, 137–154. http://doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2010.01.001

Spielman, S.E., & Logan, J.R. (2012). Using high-resolution population data to identify neighborhoods and establish their boundaries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2012.685049

Talen, E. (2018). Neighbourhood (Translated by A. Eynifar & M. Jalili). Tehran: Fekre Now Publication [in Persian]

Talen, E. (2003). Neighborhoods as service providers: a methodology for evaluating pedestrian access. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(2), 181–200. http://doi:10.1068/b12977

Tavasoli, M. (2000). Shahr, Kanoon-e Farhang, Honarha-ye Ziba, 5 (2), 34- 56 [in Persian]

Taylor, A.L., & Koch, A.M. (1996). The cultural context for effective strategy, new directions for higher education. Wiley online library, 94, 83-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.36919969410

Walters, D. (2007). Designing community, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080492605

Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 558–588. https://doi.org/10.1086/229572

Wickes, R., Zahnow, R., Corcoran, J., & Hipp, J.R. (2019). Neighbourhood social conduits and resident social cohesion. Urban Studies, 56(1), 226-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018780617

Wilson, W.J. (2006). Social theory and the concept underclass, Frankfurt Publications, 90-104. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-14547

Witten, K., & Carroll, P. (2015). Children’s neighborhoods: Places of play or spaces of fear? Springer, 3, 331- 350. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-90-3_25-1

Woldoff, R.A., & Uggen, C. (2018). Community and crime: Now more than ever. City & Community, 17(4), 939-944. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12354

Vaske, J., & Kobrin, K. C. (2001). Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior, The Journal of Environmental Education, 32 (4), 16- 21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960109598658

Motaleate Shahri

Re-examining the ontology of new urban neighborhoods on the basis of the social dimensions of traditional neighborhoods

References

References

Volume 14, Issue 53 - Serial Number 53
February 2025
Pages 19-34

Re-examining the ontology of new urban neighborhoods on the basis of the social dimensions of traditional neighborhoods

References

References

Volume 14, Issue 53 - Serial Number 53February 2025Pages 19-34

Volume 14, Issue 53 - Serial Number 53
February 2025
Pages 19-34