ISSN: 2717-4417

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Architecture ,Faculty of Arts & Architecture, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.

2 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art & Architecture, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili , Iran.

10.22034/urbs.2025.142717.5116

Abstract

Highlights

Examines the role of urban behavioral settings in strengthening place attachment.
Employs a hybrid method combining Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).
Case study: western façade of Imam Khomeini Street in Ardabil, Iran.
Identifies three key components of behavioral settings influencing citizens’ mental maps.
Provides a ranked set of strategies to reinforce place identity and urban legibility.

 
Extended Abstract

Introduction

In recent decades, the rapid transformation and uncontrolled expansion of cities have weakened citizens’ emotional bonds with urban spaces, particularly in historic contexts with strong cultural identities. Urban planning practices have often overlooked these affective connections. Imam Khomeini Street in Ardabil—one of the oldest and most vital urban axes—illustrates this challenge. This study seeks to identify and prioritize the components of behavioral settings that strengthen place attachment, using citizens’ mental maps as a key analytical tool.

Theoretical Framework

Place attachment refers to the emotional bonds people establish with specific environments. It is shaped by both cognitive and affective processes, closely linked to perceptions of safety, identity, and satisfaction.
Behavioral settings are urban spaces that accommodate spontaneous public interactions and reflect diverse user needs, thereby influencing behavior and collective memory.
Mental maps represent individuals’ cognitive and emotional perceptions of urban environments, typically consisting of nodes, landmarks, edges, and paths.
This study draws on phenomenological and environmental psychology perspectives to highlight the interconnectedness of urban form, human perception, and behavior.

Methodology

This applied-developmental research employs a mixed-method approach combining quantitative analysis and expert evaluations:

Survey: A sample of 384 Ardabil residents responded to a Likert-scale questionnaire, designed from existing literature, validated via CFA (Confirmatory Factor Analysis), and with strong reliability (Cronbach's alpha > 0.9).
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM): Used to examine relationships between urban facades, mental images, and place attachment. Indicators including RMSEA, CFI, and GFI confirmed model fit.
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP): Based on SEM outcomes, AHP was employed to rank the identified factors. Fifteen urban planning experts conducted pairwise comparisons, with weights and consistency indices calculated using Expert Choice software.

Case study area: The western side of Imam Khomeini Street, from Shariati Junction to Imam Khomeini Crossroad, a historically and spatially significant axis in Ardabil.

Results and Discussion

SEM findings confirmed three hypotheses:

Urban facades significantly influence mental images (β = 0.611).
Urban facades significantly affect place attachment (β = 0.240).
Mental images mediate the relationship between urban form and place attachment (β = 0.536).

AHP results identified three ranked dimensions of behavioral settings:

B. Enhancing place attachment and spatial legibility through key land uses and iconic buildings (Weight: 0.453) – highest rank.
A. Preserving identity and highlighting site-specific characteristics (Weight: 0.366).
C. Strengthening mental images of urban facades (Weight: 0.181).

Among 11 sub-criteria, the most influential were:

Functionally unique urban spaces (0.270).
Incorporating citizens’ needs into design (0.188).
Visual distinctiveness (0.183).

The results demonstrate a layered relationship between built form, perception, and emotional bonds, mediated by visual cues, iconic nodes, and functional identity. These findings align with Lynch’s (1960) theory of legibility, Relph’s (1976) work on place identity, and more recent studies by Ramkissoon, Mouratidis, and Mehta.

Conclusion

This research developed and tested an operational framework to identify and prioritize components of place attachment in urban behavioral settings, focusing on Imam Khomeini Street in Ardabil. The integrated use of SEM and AHP provided both statistical validation and practical prioritization of factors influencing attachment.
Key findings emphasize that:

Spatial legibility and iconic landmarks are the strongest contributors to place attachment.
Functional responsiveness to citizens’ needs enhances both perception and satisfaction.
Visual distinctiveness reinforces mental imagery and strengthens symbolic value.

Importantly, the study underscores that place attachment is not reducible to physical form alone. Instead, it emerges from the dynamic interplay between tangible elements (facades, land uses, urban design), subjective perceptions (mental maps, imagery), and socio-cultural context (identity, tradition, community engagement).
From a planning perspective, these insights call for a holistic, multi-layered approach to urban regeneration—one that integrates physical coherence with cultural continuity and participatory engagement. The proposed framework is both theoretically innovative and practically adaptable, offering a transferable tool for other cities with historic and cultural significance.
Ultimately, by embedding citizens’ lived experiences and perceptual maps into the planning process, urban designers and policymakers can create spaces that are not only functional and aesthetically coherent but also emotionally resonant, culturally grounded, and socially inclusive. Such environments foster deeper bonds between people and place, ensuring urban resilience and sustainable identity in the face of rapid change.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Altaema, M., & Hatipoğlu, H. K. (2023). The socio-economic impact of the commercial street in achieving sustainability for refugees in the host community. Current Urban Studies, 11(2), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2023.112014
Amjad, M., Mozaffar, F., Toghyani, S., & Ghasemi, V. (2021). The effect of residents' sense of belonging to the place on the neighboring facades of Isfahan Maadis. Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism, 12(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2021.270077.1631 [in Persian]
Ananahad, M., Golamalizade, H., & Asadi MalekJahan, F. (2019). Measure the sense of belonging to the place and protect the identity of residential units in the urban area: Case study: Old Quarter of Saghrysazan Rasht. Journal of Urban Ecology Researches, 10(19), 73–88.  130473/grup.2019.5645[in Persian]
Ashihara, Y. (1986). The aesthetic townscape. MIT Press.
Balali Oskoyi, A., Gharehbaglou, M., & Heydariturkmani, M. (2019). Analyzing the role of mental images in producing the sense of belonging to neighborhoods: Case study: Shotorban Neighborhood of Tabriz. Geography (Regional Planning), 9(1), 207–228. 1001.1.22286462.1397.9.1.13.3[in Persian]
Bottero, A., D'Amato, A. W., Palik, B. J., Bradford, J. B., Fraver, S., Battaglia, M. A., & Asherin, L. A. (2017). Density‐dependent vulnerability of forest ecosystems to drought. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54(6), 1605–1614. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12847
Canter, D. (1977). The psychology of place. St. Martin’s Press.
Chen, W. (2006). The study on the conservation theory and method of heritage (Unpublished master’s thesis). Chongqing University, China.
Ebrahimnia, V., Shahbazi, T., & Rahimi, R. (2022). The Analysis of Spatial Environment Influencing Social Capital in Neighborhoods of Sari City. Geography and Urban Space Development, 9(3), 121-140.  https://doi.org/10.22067/jgusd.2022.67168.0 [in Persian]
Esmaili, F., Charehjoo, F., & Hoorijani, N. (2020). Analyzing and evaluating facades with a special approach to visual aesthetics using the grid method: Case study: Enqelab Street in Sanandaj. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 17(82), 65–78. 22034/bagh.2019.165147.3934[in Persian]
Gifford, R., Hine, D. W., Muller-Clemm, W., & Shaw, K. T. (2002). Why architects and laypersons judge buildings differently: Cognitive properties and physical bases. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 19(2), 131–148.
Hanks, L., Zhang, L., & Line, N. (2020). Perceived similarity in third places: Understanding the effect of place attachment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 86, 102455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102455
He, H., & Gyergyak, J. (2021). Enlightenment from street art activities in urban public space. Pollack Periodica, 16(1), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1556/606.2021.16.1.16
Hollander, J. B., & Anderson, E. C. (2020). The impact of urban façade quality on affective feelings. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-05-2020-0090
Jacobs, J. (2010). Dark age ahead. Vintage Canada.
Keeble, L. B. (1969). Principles and practice of town and country planning. Estates Gazette.
Khatami, S. M., & Bojari, P. (2020). Analysis of the challenges of Tehran’s urban views in the recent century. Urban and Rural Management, (58), 111.  https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2021.270077.1631[in Persian]
Kim, M. (2021). Plural and fluid place attachment amid tourism-induced neighborhood change in a disadvantaged neighborhood in South Korea. Geoforum, 121, 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.02.003
Mehta, V. (2007). Lively streets: Determining environmental characteristics to support social behavior. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X07307947
Mehta, V., & Bosson, J. K. (2021). Revisiting lively streets: Social interactions in public space. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 41(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X19890351
Mouratidis, K. (2018). Rethinking how built environments influence subjective well-being: A new conceptual framework. Journal of Urbanism, 11(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/1080/17549175.2017.1310741
Mouratidis, K. (2019). The impact of urban tree cover on perceived safety. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 44, 126434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126434
Mouratidis, K., & Hassan, R. (2020). Contemporary versus traditional styles in architecture and public space: A virtual reality study with 360-degree videos. Cities, 97, 102499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102499
Moulay, A., & Ujang, N. (2021). Insight into the issue of underutilised parks: What triggers the process of place attachment? International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 13(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2020.1797980
Moulay, A., Ujang, N., Maulan, S., & Ismail, S. (2018). Understanding the process of parks’ attachment: Interrelation between place attachment, behavioural tendencies, and the use of public place. City, Culture and Society, 14, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2017.12.004
Rahimi, R., & Ansari, M. (2020). Recreating Place in Iranian Monuments Case Study: Hafez Garden-Tomb (1452-1936 A.D.). Iranian Journal of Archaeological Studies, 10(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.22111/ijas.2020.6627
Rahimi, R., & Razani, F. (2022). Assessing the Relationship between Physical Healing Components of Educational Environments and Mental Health of Users (Case Study: Students of University of Mazandaran). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology8(24), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.30495/jest.2022.61216.5410 [in Persian]
Ramkissoon, H., Weiler, B., & Smith, L. D. G. (2012). Place attachment and pro-environmental behaviour in national parks: The development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20(2), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.602194
Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. Pion.
Sequeira, A. (2017). Ephemeral art in impermanent spaces: The effects of street art in the social construction of public space. In Ephemeral art in impermanent spaces (pp. 65–74). http://hdl.handle.net/10071/17795
Shafipour Yourdshahi, P., Kiani, M., Hamzeloo, S., & Moazemi, M. (2023). The influence of “culture from Rappaport's viewpoint” on “mental image” and examining the role of this influence on the formation of the environment. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 15(41), 103–118. 22034/aaud.2023.294858.2508 [in Persian]
Trossman Haifler, Y., & Fisher-Gewirtzman, D. (2024). Spatial parameters determining urban wellbeing: A behavioral experiment. Buildings, 14(1), 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14010211
Wang, H., Zhao, Y., Gao, X., & Gao, B. (2021). Collaborative decision-making for urban regeneration: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Land Use Policy, 107, 105479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105479
Yang, M., & Kang, J. (2016). Pitch features of environmental sounds. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 374, 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.04.036
Yang, X., & Kang, J. (2022). The effect of visual and acoustic factors on the sound preference for waterscapes in urban public spaces. Applied Acoustics, 197, 108945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.108945
Zou, H., Liu, R., Cheng, W., Lei, J., & Ge, J. (2023). The association between street built environment and street vitality based on quantitative analysis in historic areas: A case study of Wuhan, China. Sustainability, 15(2), 1732. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021732