ISSN: 2717-4417

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of management

2 Ph.D. student of Industrial Management-Finance, Islamic Azad University of dehaghan, Dehaghan, Iran

10.34785/J011.2019.360

Abstract

An increase in the use of public transport offers one of the most convenient strategies for alleviation of the problems resulting from the excessive use of the private car (congestion, pollution, noise, etc.) in most urban areas. Rail transport systems provide a sustainable transport model in cities, with advantages including very high safety, passenger convenience and comfort, absence of traffic congestion, low energy consumption, proper speed, absence of fossil fuels, and low passenger transport costs. For improvement of public transport, it is necessary to develop appropriate tools for measuring and monitoring the quality of service. From among the variety of methods that are there for measurement of transport service quality, one based on customer perspective was adopted in the present research, aimed at segmentation and analysis of citizen expectation from urban railway in the city of Isfahan, Iran using the Kano, FAHP, and FTOPSIS models. For data collection in this applied descriptive-analytical study, a mixture of library and field investigation was conducted. Based on the library study, the theoretical framework of the research was formulated, and fifteen of the most important citizen expectations were identified. These included 1. proper waiting time for passengers to receive service, 2. Internet (WiFi) and mobile network access on the train, 3. use of other public transport systems next to the stations, 4. provision of information on the train, 5. attractive environmental graphics, 6. adaptation of the stations for the disabled, the blind, and cyclists, 7. convenient train spaces in terms of cleaning, cooling and heating, and air conditioning, 8. provision of transport service to passengers on holidays and during off-hours, 9. security at the stations, 10. appropriate location of the stations, 11. proper appearance and suitability of the staff, 12. availability of elevators and escalators at the stations, 13. train arrivals matching the timetable 14. availability of parking spaces at the stations, and 15. enhancement of passenger transport capacity. Based on the field method, the required data were collected using three questionnaires: Kano, paired comparison, and significance assessment. The research population was divided to two groups. The first group, answering the Kano questionnaire, included all the citizens taking Isfahan urban train. Morgan’s table was utilized for specification of sample size for the first group, based on which, sample size was set to 380, and the simple random sampling method was used. The second group, who answered the questionnaire for paired comparison between the items and that for significance assessment of the indicators, included experts engaged in the field of urban trains. Finally, the results of item ranking indicated that the item titled proper waiting time for passengers to receive service had priority over the other items. In urban public transport systems, it is very important to determine waiting time for passengers at the stations to benefit from the provided services. Proper scheduling that results in reduced waiting times can greatly affect user satisfaction, and can be essential for system management. Availability of a credible schedule allows passengers to adjust their arrival times at the stations, thereby experiencing shorter waiting times.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Ahmadi, S., & Askari Dehabadi, H. (2015). Investigating the Relationship between Quality of Service, Satisfaction, Trust and Loyalty among Customers (Case Study: Active Passenger Companies in Tehran Terminals). Journal of Development & Evolution Management 23, 11-20. [in persian]
Alipur, A., Nikenkhan, M., Motaghi, A., & Rasti, M. (2012). Functional Analysis of Passenger Satisfaction with Architectural Spaces and Elements in Tehran Urban Train Stations (Case Study-Golshahr Station, Karaj). 11th Iranian Conference on Transport and Traffic Engineering, Tehran, Tehran Transport and Traffic Organization, Tehran Municipality Transport and Traffic Deputy. [in persian]
Aydin, N., Celik, E., & Taskin Gumus, A. (2015). A hierarchical customer satisfaction framework for evaluating rail transit systems of Istanbul. Transportation Research Part A, 77, 61–81.
Baharvand, A. (2012). IT detection in traffic control and reduction. Master of Science Degree in Dezful University of Applied Sciences. [in persian]
Behbahani, H., Afandizadeh., Sh., Rahimov, K. (2008). Analysis of Passenger Waiting Time at Subway Stations Using Simulation Technique (Tehran Metro Case Study). Journal of Transportation, 2 (3), 15-30. [in persian]
Cascetta, E., Cartenì, A. (2014). A quality-based approach to public transportation planning: theory and a case study. Int. J. Sustain. Transport. 8 (1), 84–106.
Chen, C.T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for Group Decision-Making under Fuzzy Environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 1-9.
Daneshmandrokhi R, A., Nazemi, SH, & MollomaiFarimani, N (2016). Prioritize an organization's quality management project starting with customer expectations. Journal of Industrial Managemen. 1, 23-42. [in persian]
Givoni, M., & Rietveld, P. (2007). The access journey to the railway station and its role in passengers satisfaction with rail travel, Transport Policy, 14, 367-365.
Hatami Nejad, H., Pour Ahmad, A., Farajisbekbar, H., & Azimi, A (2013). Measuring the Satisfaction of Public Transport System Users in the South Alborz Area. Journal of Urban Economics and Management. 1 (1), 1-4. [in persian]
Hekmatnia, H., & Mousavi, M. (2007). Measuring the Rate and Factors Affecting Citizens' Satisfaction with Municipal Performance, Case Study: Yazd City. Journal of Geography and Development, 5 (9), 181-196. [in persian]
HoseyniShahparian, N (2015). Analysis of Spatial Justice with Emphasis on Ahvaz Metropolitan Public Utilities. MSc Thesis, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. [in persian]
Hossain, B., & Sirajul Islam, M., (2013). Determinants of Customer Satisfaction on Service Quality of Railway Platforms in Bangladesh: A Study on Chittagong and Dhaka Railway Platforms. Journal of Business Studies,. XXXIV, (1), 63-84.
Imam, R. (2014), Measuring Public Transport Satisfaction from User Surveys, International Journal of Business and Management,. 9 (6), 106-114.
Jedali, M., & Imam Gholizadeh, S. (2014). Investigating the Relationship between Tehran Metro Performance in Urban Traffic to Increase Satisfaction of Tehran Citizens. International Conference on Economic Business and Management Excellence and Management. [in persian]
Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F. and Tsjui, S. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. Hinshitsu 14(2), 147–156.
Mardomi, K., & ghamari, Hesam (2012). Priority Assessment of Influence Factors in Subway Station Architecture on User Satisfaction, Case Study: Tehran Metro Subway Stations 1 and 2. Journal of Urban and Rural Management, 30, 39-52. [in persian]
Massami, E.P., Myamba, B.M. & Edward, L. (2016) Fuzzy Analysis and Evaluation of Public Transport Service Quality: A Case Study of Dar es Salaam City, Tanzania. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 6 (1), 297-311.
Mirkatooli, J., Mohammadi, F., Negari, A., & Shukri, A. (2014). Survey of Public Satisfaction with Quality of Public Transportation Services (Case Study: Gorgan District 2). J. Urban Structure and Function Quarterly, Issue 1 (1) 133-151. [in persian]
Momani, A., Al-Hawari, T., Al-Shebami, H. & Al-Araidah, O. (2014). Classifying and Rankin Healthcare Quality Attributes Using Integrated Kano- Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process Model. Engineering Management Research; 3 (1): 68-88.
Nasiri, E., & amoozademihdiraji, H (2014). Citizens' Satisfaction with Municipal Service Performance Using the Kano Case-Model of Gorgan Municipality. Journal of Geography and Urban-Regional Planning, (13), 97- 106. [in persian]
Nazer, H., & Javidi, A. (2014). Investigating the Factors Affecting the Increase of Urban Train Travel in Mashhad. 14th International Conference on Transport and Traffic Engineering, Tehran, Vice President and Traffic Transport Organization. [in persian]
Nobakht, F., & Rostami, M. (2011). Investigation of passenger accidents in urban rail transport system. Tadbir Monthly, (‌10), 12-28. [in persian]
Nouri, S., NikFal azar, S. (2011). Estimating passenger waiting time at a metro station and investigating factors affecting it using a simulation approach. Tadbir Monthly. (33), 39-39. [in persian]
Paridar, M. a. (2015). Citizens' Satisfaction with Cultural and Social Services of the Municipal Organization, Using the Combined Canvas Model Gap Analysis. Journal of Marketing Quarterly Pars mmodir, 1 (1). [in persian]
Pohekar, S. D., & Ramachandran, M., (2004). Application of Multi-criteria Decision Making to Sustainable Energy Planning-A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 8 (4), 365-381.
Reza, K., & Vassilis, S. M., (1998). Delphi hierarchy process (DHP): A methodology for priority setting derived from the Delphi method and analytical hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 137 (1), 347- 354.
Sahelgozin, M., & Alimohammadi, AS (2016). Optimization of Metro Scheduling and Stopping Schedules for Subway Trains Using NSGA-II Algorithm to Reduce Travel Time and Increase Economic and Environmental Performance of the System. Transportation Engineering, 8 (1), 51- 29. [in persian]
Shah. M. N., Oza, A., Raitani, V., & Gupta, K. (2016). Measuring Customer Satisfaction Using Service Quality Parameters in Mumbai Metro Transport Service. 4th International Conference, Growth, Globalisation, Governance.
Shahi, J., & Saadi Nejad, S (2008). Waiting time for bus passengers in the non-central areas of Tehran. 8th Iran Traffic and Traffic Engineering Conference, Tehran, Tehran Transport and Traffic Organization, Tehran Municipality Transport and Traffic Deputy. [in persian]
Shen. X., Tan, K.C., & Xie, M (2000). Innovative product development using Kano's model and QFD, European journal of Innovation Management, 3 (2), 91-99.
Soltani, Ali (2007). Discussions on urban transport, emphasis on the sustainability approach. Shiraz University, 1- 46. [in persian]
Sun, C.C. (2010). A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 7745–7754.
Taylor, Z. (2011). Book review: Integrated Transport by Moshe Givoni and David Banister, Journal of Transport Geography, 19 (4), 1001-1008.
Torfi, F., Zanjirani Farahani, R., & Rezapour, Sh., (2010). Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives. Applied Soft Computing, 10, 520–528.
Walden, D. (1993). Kanos meyhods for understanding customers_defind quality .Center for quality of management journal, 2 (4), 1-36.
Wang, T.C., & Lee, H.D. (2009). Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 8980–8985.
Yalcin, N. Bayrakdaroglu, A., & Kahraman, C. (2012).  Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 39 (1), 350-364.
Zhen, F., Cao, J., & Tang, J. (2018). Exploring correlates of passenger satisfaction and service improvement priorities of the Shanghai-Nanjing High Speed Rail. journal of transport and land use 11 (1), 559–573.