ISSN: 2717-4417

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Geomorphology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.

2 Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic azad university, Marvdasht, Iran.

3 Department of Geography, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

10.34785/J011.2022.007

Abstract

Highlights
- Participation of citizens in various urban affairs brings many benefits such as enhancement of social capital, satisfaction, and improvement of the civil society.
- A condition for achievement of sustainable development in today’s cities is the participation of citizens in its various affairs.
- The constituent components of citizens’ participation include mental-spiritual participation, participation in provision of human resources, political participation, and financial participation.
- A low level of participation of citizens in urban management can be attributed to various factors, including the weakness of city managers and the rules and regulations concerning their selection, citizens’ lack of concern, etc.
 
Introduction
Citizens’ participation in various matters of urban spaces is one of the most important issues in achievement of sustainable urban development, an acceptable level of which is one of the most significant concerns of policy makers and urban planners. For achievement of sustainable development in Ilam, a border city in Iran, it is of particular importance to investigate the status of citizen participation in urban management and identify the factors affecting the level thereof, which makes up the main purpose of this study.
Theoretical Framework
Living in a democratic society requires people to play an active role in various aspects of their lives (Predescu & Darjan, 2010: 3241). Citizen participation is of great importance in systems claiming democracy (Ginieniewicz, 2007: 328) and is vital for any democratic society, and democracy can be developed only through involved, informed citizens. In addition, it is important to have citizens ready to take responsibility for changing the reality of today’s world (Manganelli et al., 2012: 1476). For this reason, public participation is seen today as a new strategy in development (Khajeh Shahkoohi et al., 2015: 4). An inductive look at the existing patterns of participation in the world indicates that they can be classified according to three different criteria: the type of participation (1- decision-making, 2- financing, and 3- manpower), the field of participation in activities (1- construction, 2- environment, 3- ensuring city safety, 4- monitoring, 5- municipal services, and 6- social welfare), and the type of organization (1- spontaneous, self-motivated organizations and 2- formal, motivated organizations). Of course, it is also possible to classify participation patterns based on the activity to perform which the participation is made (Rezaei and Asyabani, 2018: 146).
In a general conclusion, it can be stated that citizen participation in urban management involves different aspects and a particular position in the issue of sustainable urban development. However, different factors affect the level of citizen participation in urban management, which can vary by urban space.
Methodology
This is a descriptive-correlational applied quantitative study using the analysis of covariance-variance among correlation methods. The research area is Ilam, and the research population includes 194030 citizens of the city who are over 18 years old. 383 citizens were selected based on Cochran’s formula using stratified random sampling. In addition to documentary studies, the main research tool for data collection was a researcher-made questionnaire. It should be noted that the design of the questionnaire used to measure citizen participation in urban management was based on the works by Amirahmadi et al. (2016) and Meymandi Parizi (2017). The validity of the research tool was evaluated and confirmed through consultation of experts and university teachers (face validity) and also using convergence. Combined reliability coefficients (greater than 0.7) and Cronbach’s alpha (greater than 0.7) were used to measure reliability. The two methods of descriptive statistics (frequency, frequency percentage, mean, and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (correlation analysis and structural equation modeling) were used to analyze the data. It should be noted that one  statistical method used in the field of structural equation modeling is partial least squares, calling for the use of relevant software such as SPSS and SmartPLS to analyze the data.
Results and Discussion
The results of the structural model analysis demonstrated that the variable of satisfaction with the performance of urban managers exhibited a significant effect on other independent variables. Thus, it had the greatest impact on the variables of proper urban governance (with an impact factor of 0.275), job satisfaction (with an impact factor of 0.262), and social capital (with an impact factor of 0.255). On the other hand, the variable of satisfaction with the performance of urban managers exhibited the slightest effect (with an impact factor of 0.05) on the level of citizen participation in urban management, where we can point out the low level of citizen satisfaction with the performance of urban managers (2.37 on average).
Conclusion
The results demonstrated that there were significant relationships between citizen participation in urban management in the study area (the dependent variable of the research) and job satisfaction, satisfaction with the performance of urban managers, social capital, proper urban governance, quality of life (negative correlation), and sense of belonging to the place. Thus, it can be stated that the level of citizen participation decreases and increases as the level of each of these variables is decreased and increased. The results obtained from the structural analysis model (with the partial least squares method) indicated that the independent research variables were capable of explaining 75.8% of the variance in Ilam citizens’ participation in urban management. The values of the coefficients for the impacts of each of those variables on the dependent variable include 0.35 (quality of life), 0.05 (satisfaction with the performance of urban managers), -0.075 (social capital), 0.131 (job satisfaction), 0.372 (proper urban governance), and 0.275 (spatial affiliation).

Keywords

Main Subjects

Alizadeh, K., Razavinejad, M., & Radfar, M. (2013). Investigating the role and participation of people in administrating urban affairs (A case study of zone 10 Mashhad). Urban Structure and Function Studies1(1), 61-87. [in Persian]
Amini, Y., & Amini, M. (2017). Investigation on Influential Social and Economic Factors on Citizen's Participation in Urban Affairs Related to Municipality. Quarterly Journal of Social Development (Previously Human Development), 11(2), 179-198. doi: 10.22055/qjsd.2017.12688 [in Persian]
Amirahmadi, R., Navabakhsh, M., & Zanjani, H. (2016). The role of Cultural Capital in Participation of citizens into Renovation of old texture Constructions Case Study: Mashhad city. Two Quarterly Journal of Contemporary Sociological Research5(8), 123-143. doi: 10.22084/csr.2016.1649 [in Persian]
Boudjelida, A., Mellouli, S & Lee, J. (2016). Electronic Citizens Participation: Systematic Review, Conference: 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, March 2016.
Bozarjemehri, K., hossini Kahnoji, S. R., & Hosseini, N. (2020). Analysis of factors affecting the participation of citizens in the government of cities (case study: eight areas of Ahvaz). Geographical Planning of Space9(34), 37-52. doi: 10.30488/gps.2020.91917 [in Persian]
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation model-ling In G. A.
Duzi, B., Osman, R., Lehejcek., J., Novakova, E., Taraba., P & Trojan, J. (2019). Exploring citizen science in post-socialist space: Uncovering its hidden character in the Czech Republic. Moravian Geographical Reports, 27(4), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2019-0019
Eslami, R., & Reisi, N. (2017). Citizen Participation in International Development Law: Grounds, Obstacles and Supporting Ways. Public Law Researsh18(54), 143-169. doi: 10.22054/qjpl.2017.7430 [in Persian]
Flavin, P. & Keane, M.J. (2012). Life Satisfaction and Political Participation: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(1), 63-78.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 5-39.
Ginieniewicz, J. (2007). The Scope of Political Participation. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 8(3), 327–345.
Habibnezhad, A., & Ameri, Z. (2019). The Role of Public Participation in Enacting Municipal Regulation: A Comparative Study of Western and Iranian Laws. Comparative Study on Islamic & Western Law, 6(3), 1-28. doi: 10.22091/csiw.2019.4478.1586 [in Persian]
Haji Alizadeh, J., Mousavi, Ch., & Zarafshan, A. (2016). An analysis on the correlation between the model of decent urban governance and the level of citizen participation (a case study of Shiraz city). Journal of Geographical Space, 16(54), 237-260. [in Persian]
Hashemian, M., Behrvan, H., & Noghani, M. (2012). Factors affecting citizens' participation in Mashhad city administration. Journal of Social Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 10(1), 173-195. [in Persian]
Henseler, J., Ringle, CM., Sinkovics, R.R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20(1): 277-319.
Hosseinzadeh, A. H., Eider, N., & Abbasi, E. (2013). Investigating factors affecting citizenship participation among the citizens of Khorramabad city, Urban Sociological Studies, 2(2), 59-82. [in Persian]
Kalantari, A., & Rasoli, B. (2015). Feasibility study Citizen participation in the management and development of neighborhood parks in Tehran. Urban Management, 14(38), 425-448. [in Persian]
Kao, T.Y., Lu, Y.W., Sung, T.H & Yang, C.C. (2018). The citizen participation and practice of health and medical policy making. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 117(1), 91-93.
Khajeh Shahkuhi, A. R., NajafiKani, A. A., Khoshfar, G. R., & Shahfaee, S. (2015). The Degree of Citizens Participation in the Activities Rendered by Municipality Construction and Services (a case Study, Galugah City). Quarterly Journal of Environmental-based Territorial Planning, 8(29), 1-26. [in Persian]
Manganelli, S. Alivernini, F. Lucidi, & Di Leo, I. (2012). Expected political participation in Italy: a study based on Italian ICCS data. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1476 – 1481.
Meymandi parizi, S. (2017). Review and Comparative Study of the Inclination to Participate among Old and New Urban Textile Residents Using AHP Model (Case Study: Old and New Neighborhoods of Kerman). Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement7(25), 241-262. doi: 10.22111/gaij.2017.3487 [in Persian]
Moradi, G. (2014). The Construction and Validation of the construct “Urban participation”: Case of Study: City of Kermanshah. Urban Sociological Studies4(11), 149-180. [in Persian]
Naranjo-Zolotov, M., Oliveira, T., Cruz-Jesus, F., Martins, J., Gonçalves, R., Branco, F & Xavier, N. (2019). Examining social capital and individual motivators to explain the adoption of online citizen participation. Future Generation Computer Systems, 92, 302–311.
M., & Darjanb, I. (2010). Promoting political participation through adult education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3241–3245.
Rezaei, R., Asiyabani, Z. (2019). .Assessment of quality of life and its impact on citizen participation in urban affairs case study of Neyriz city. Geography, 16(58), 141-156. [in Persian]
Sarvarzadeh, S.K., Sza, I. & Foroozan, A. (2014). Evaluating Citizens’ Participation in the Urban Heritage Conservation of Historic Area of Shiraz. Asian Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies Chung-Ang University, Seoul, S. Korea, 25-27 August 2014.
Shapiro, R. & Winters, M. S. (2008). Political Participation and Quality of Life, Inter-American Development Bank, Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID), Research Department, Departamento de Investigación, Working Paper 638.
Sharepour, M., & Hojjati, H. (2018). Analysis of social factors affecting citizenship participation: empirical evaluation of social capital theory. Urban Sociological Studies8(28), 1-32. [in Persian]
Stevenson, C., Dixon, J., Hopkins, N & Luyt, R. (2015). The Social Psychology of Citizenship, Participation and Social Exclusion: Introduction to the Special Thematic Section. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(2), 1–19.
Taghvaei, M., Babanasab, R., & Moosavi, Ch. (2010). An Analysis of Assessment of Effective Factors on Citizen's Participation in Civic Management: Case Study of District 4 of Tabriz. Journal Urban - Regional Studies and Research, 1(2), 19-36. [in Persian]
Turrini, T., Dörler, D., Richter, R., Heigl, F and Bonn, A. (2018). The threefold potential of environmental citizen science - Generating knowledge, creating learning opportunities and enabling civic participation. Biological Conservation, 225, 176–186.
Yaghfoori, H., & Rafieyan, S. (2015). A Study of the Function of Urban Management Regarding the Participation of Citizens in Urban Affairs: The Case of Fasa. Journal of Urban - Regional Studies and Research7(27), 81-100. [in Persian]
Yaghfoori, H., Aghaei, V., Moazzeni, M., & Badali, A. (2017). The role of management indicators and social capital in promoting citizen’s participation in urban affairs (Case Study: Parsabad City). Regional Planning7(27), 133-146. [in Persian]
Zangiabadi, A., & Zanganeh, M. (2014). Participatory citizenship and its role in optimizing urban management (Case Study: Mashhad District One). Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR)2(2), 219-238. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2014.51969 [in Persian]