ISSN: 2717-4417

Document Type : Research Paper


Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.


- This paper proposes a model for improving the implementation of small-scale participatory projects.
- The model is based on the findings of a case study of the Mahalle Ma project in Mashhad, Iran.
- The model identifies three key relationships: the people and the facilitator, the people and urban management, and urban management and the facilitator.
Contemporary urban planning knowledge has undergone significant changes, shifting from natural and engineering sciences to interdisciplinary fields with a focus on social and human sciences. Urban development plans now emphasize public and private participation. As the second-largest city in Iran, Mashhad plays a vital role within the country due to its regional centrality, large population, and diversity. It is essential to prioritize social sustainability and encourage public participation in the planning process.
Theoretical Framework
Implementation is a critical component of the urban design process and can be interpreted in two ways: as the essence of the entire process or as an independent step within the process. Through a systematic study of various sources and analysis of urban design processes conducted by researchers, it is possible to categorize the urban design process involved in selecting the design group, defining initial objectives, assessing the existing conditions, clarifying goals, presenting design alternatives, evaluating options, optimizing, developing an implementation plan, implementing, and conducting post-implementation evaluations. Based on research synthesis, factors influencing the implementation of small-scale participatory projects can be categorized into five aspects: development stakeholders (including designers and implementers), management-planning system structures, economic considerations, public participation, and legal considerations.
This paper adopts a qualitative approach and data-based method through semi-structured interviews to identify obstacles, challenges, and factors influencing the implementation of small-scale participatory projects (specifically, neighborhood units) in Mashhad. The study focuses on stakeholders including individuals, urban management, and facilitators involved in the "Mahalle Ma" project. Theoretical sampling was employed until saturation was reached. Data analysis utilized qualitative content analysis with a summative approach and MAXQDA 2018. Open and axial coding techniques were applied to identify the foundational concepts related to the implementation of the targeted projects.
Results and Discussion
The results of this study highlight the importance of effective collaboration and communication between stakeholders, including the people, urban management, and the facilitator team. Building trust, improving public participation, and addressing financial constraints are essential for the successful implementation of small-scale participatory projects.
The relationship between the people and the facilitator: The quality of real participation by the people, as the most important stakeholder group, has a significant impact on achieving the goals of the plan. Negative experiences and a lack of trust in city management can present challenges for the project. To enhance citizens' participation, the facilitator and designer can employ appropriate techniques to involve people in the process, clarify the project definition, and connect it with the needs assessment stage. Effective communication with the social council of the neighborhoods is also crucial, as the lack of it can hinder the quality of citizens' participation.
The relationship between the people and urban management: Urban management has initiated this plan with long-term goals in mind, including fostering a culture of participation. However, the inadequate allocation of funds and a lack of effective inter-organizational synergy have resulted in intangible short-term outcomes for the people. This situation raises concerns about increasing mistrust and decreasing satisfaction with the municipality's performance.
The relationship between urban management and the facilitator: Both urban management and the facilitator play crucial roles in promoting public satisfaction with the project. They should work towards achieving long-term goals by monitoring, improving, and maintaining a continuous planning process. This entails fostering a culture of participation through trust-building and capacity development. However, the frequent changes in design and planning approaches due to shifts in the urban management structure can affect the facilitator's authority to achieve project goals. The facilitator team should also ensure a constant connection between the needs assessment stage, design, and implementation steps.
This study highlights the crucial role of urban management throughout the various stages of an urban development project. In the pre-implementation stage, urban management plays a fundamental role in selecting an expert design and implementation team. They also prioritize goals based on the type of management system in place.
Recognizing the current situation requires the collaboration of the facilitator and the people to establish a shared understanding of the problem. The facilitator acts as a mediator, identifying the real demands of the people and conveying them to management levels to define the project in subsequent stages. Verification of goals and adjustments are made in consultation with citizens, academic experts, and local institutions.
The presentation of design alternatives by the facilitator team ensures alignment with the real needs of the people. Evaluation and optimization of alternatives involve active participation from the people, who contribute to selecting the optimal alternative based on their genuine needs. Urban management also considers economic and technical factors in choosing the optimal option.
During the implementation stage, urban management plays a critical role in ensuring the design team's recommendations are executed properly by selecting the right contractors. The involvement of the social council, representing the people, is essential in monitoring the implementation process in line with the goals and needs assessment.
In the post-implementation stage, continuous monitoring and modification are necessary, with direct input from the people through the facilitator team and urban management. This promotes the long-term continuity and success of the plan, fostering a culture of participation. 


Main Subjects

Alexander E. What is Plan-Implementation and how is It Taught? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 5(2), 107–118, 1986.
Alterman, R & Hill, M. (1978) Implementation of Urban Land Use Plans, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 44:3, 274-285.
Azarnia, F. (2021). The Pathology of Mahalle Ma Project. The Department of the Cultural and Social Organization of Mashhad Municipality. [In Persian]
Azizi, M. M, Arasteh, M. (2012). Evaluation of Forecasting Implementations and Development Directions in Master Plan of Lar City. Journal of Urban-Regional Studies and Research, 3(11), 1-22. [In Persian]
S. H. (1998). Urban Design Process. Ninth edition. Tehran University Publication. [In Persian]
Berke, Philip; Backhurst, Michael; Day, Maxine; Ericksen, Neil; Laurian, Lucie; Crawford, Jan and Dixon, Jennifer (2006). What makes plan implementation successful? An evaluation of local plans and implementation practices in New Zealand. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2006, volume 33, pages 581-600.
Bobbio, L. (2019). Designing effective public participation. Policy AND Society, 41-57.
Burby, R. (2003) Making Plans that Matter: Citizen Involvement and Government action, Journal of the American Planning Association, 69:1, 33-49.
Charter of Mashhad Urbanization Rights approved by the sixty-fourth meeting of Mashhad Islamic Council, July 17, 2018. [In Persian]
Courage, c. (2013). The global phenomenon of tactical urbanism as an indicator of new forms of citizenship. engage 32: Citizenship and Belonging, 88-97.
Daneshpour, S. A., Qafari-azar, Z. (2020). Collaborative Participation Approach of Urban Design, from Idea to Design (Heravi Square, Tehran). The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 17(82), 5-20. [In Persian]
Farnahad Consulting Engineers (2018). Development and construction plan (comprehensive) of Mashhad. General Department of Road and Urban Development of Khorasan Razavi Province. [In Persian]
Flyvbjerg, B. & T. Richardson. (2002). "Planning and Foucault, in Search of the Dark Side of Planning Theory", in P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr _Jones(eds.) Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory, London: Rutledge, 44-62.
Ghaemmaghami Farahani, G; Afkanpour, N; Ghahremani, H. A review of implementation challenges of the plan called "Renovation and Rehabilitation of deteriorated urban area" in Abkooh neighborhood of Mashhad. FUPS Conference: The Second International Conference on Future of Urban Public Space, (2021). Tehran, Iran.
Ghalandarian I. (2022) Application of Grounded Theory in The Emergence of an Urban Theory: Regeneration of the Central Part of Mashhad Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture, 10(2): 85-103. [In Persian]
Golkar, K. (2003), From birth to maturity of urban design, Soffeh, 13(2-1), 9-23. [In Persian]
Golkar, K. (2012). Urban Planning: Process or Processes?. Soffeh, 21(1), 99-134. [In Persian]
Hanachi, P, Poursarajian, M. (2015). Revitalization of historic urban fabric (Regard to participation), Tehran University Publication. [In Persian]
Innes, J., & Booher, D. (2000). Public Participation in Planning: New Strategies for the 21st Century. 1-40.
Khademalhosini, A, Arefipour, S. (2012). Participatory urban planning and position of people in urban planning, Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 7(19), 108-123. [In Persian]
Kheirandish, A (2016). Defining the Principles for Tactical Urbanism in Urban Neighborhood in Order to Improve Participation; Case study: Tasilahat neighborhood, Tehran. Master's thesis in urban design, University of Arts, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning. [In Persian]
Khoury, Zaki B. (1996). Implementing the new urban agenda: the case of Ismailia, Egypt. Environment & Urbanization. 8(1). 195- 209.
Lang, J. (2007), Urban Design: A Typology of Procedures and Products (Translated by Bahrainy. S. H). Tehran University Publication. [In Persian]
Laurian, L, Day, M, Backhurst, M, Berke, P, Ericksen, N, Crawford, J, Dixon, J & Chapman, S. (2004) What drives plan implementation? Plans, planning agencies and developers, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47:4, 555-577.
Lydon, M; Garcia, A. (2015). Tactical Urbanism: Short-term Action for Long-term Change. Island Press.
Mahdavinejad, M., & Amini, M. (2011). Public participation for sustainable urban planning In Case of Iran. Procedia Engineering, 405-413.
Mataland E. Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 5(2), (Apr. 1995) 145-174, 1995.
Moeinifar, F. (2013), Evaluation of Renovation and Rehabilitation Plans of deteriorated urban areas with a participatory planning approach (case study: Mahdi Abad neighborhood, Qasrdasht-Shiraz), Master's thesis on urban planning, Shiraz University, Faculty of Art and Architecture. [In Persian]
Moradi Masihi, v, Tezar, Sh. (2019). ]Improving urban management with emphasis on the realization of city development plans (Case study: District 1 of Tehran) [. Journal of geography, civil engineering and urban management studies, 5(3), 99-115. [In Persian]
Moughtin, Cliff (1999). Urban design; Method and techniques. British library cataloging in publication data.
Nisha, B. Nelson, M. (2012). Making a case for evidence-informed decision-making for participatory urban design. Urban Des Int 17, 336–348.
Norozi, S, Javan Forouzandeh, A. (2021). Analyzing the aspects of participation concept in the process of public space design. Motaleate Shahri, 10(38), 49-62. [In Persian]
Nutt, Paul c. (2007). Examining the link between plan evaluation and implementation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 74. 1252–1271.
Pakzad, J. (2006). Mabani Nazari va Farayand Tarahi Shahri ]Theoretical Bases and urban design process[. Eighth edition. Shahidi Publication. [In Persian]
Pantic, M., Cilliers, J., Cimadomo, G., Montaño, F., Olufemi, O., Torres Mallma, S., & van den Berg, J. (2021). Challenges and Opportunities for Public Participation in Urban and Regional Planning during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Lessons Learned for the Future. Land, 1-19.
Pourhossein Roshan, H., Pourjafar, M. R., & Aliakbari, S. (2021). The Challenges of Implementing Urban Plans in Iran. Soffeh, 31(2), 111-128. [In Persian]
Prilenska, V. Liias, (2015). Challenges of Recent Participatory Urban Design Practices in Riga, Procedia Economics and Finance, Volume 21. 88-96.
Rezaei, N, Majedi, H, Zarabadi, Z. S, Zabihi, H. (2018). Explaining the Role of Factors Affecting the Realization of Urban Development Plans (Case Study: Shiraz City), 9(34), 47-58. [In Persian]
Saeedi Rezvani, H. (2007). Implementation of participatory urban planning in Iran, (Case study: Ghale Abkuh of Mashhad), Honar_ha_ye Ziba, 28(28). 23-34. [In Persian]
Safaee pour, M., & Saeedi, J. (2015). Investigation of effective factors in the inefficiency of urban development plans in Iran. Urban Management Studies, 7(22), 12-30. [In Persian]
Safavi, A. (2012). Investigating the Role of Urban Development Management System in Good Urban Design Implementation, Urban Management, 9(28), 255-272. [In Persian]
Saghafi Asl, A (2019). Presentation a model for Iran urban design projects implementation based on Foucault and Habermas theories. Motaleate Shahri, 8(30), 69-84. [In Persian]
Saghafi Asl, A., Zebardast, E., & Majedi, H. (2013). Application of TOPSIS Technique in Ranking of Tehran Urban Design Projects with Implementation Evaluation Approach. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 18(19), 69-78. [In Persian]
Saghafi Asl, A., Zebardast, E., & Majedi, H. (2017). Evaluation of Implementing Urban Design Projects in Iran, Case Study: Implemented Projects in Tehran. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 9(17), 185-197. [In Persian]
SaghafiAsl, A., Zebardast, E., & Majedi, H. (2015). Identification and Prioritization of Criteria and Indicators in Implementation of Iran’s Urban Design Projects. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 7(13), 183-197. [In Persian]
Sanoff, H. (2006). Multiple views of participatory design. Middle East Technical University Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 131-143.
Sardarian, S. (2014). ]Citizen participation as a realization key for Renovation and Rehabilitation Plans of deteriorated urban areas (Case Study: Jolan neighborhood of Hamadan city)[, Haft Hesar Journal of Environmental Studies, 2(6): 17-28. [In Persian]
Sharifian Sani, M. (2002), Citizen participation, urban governance and urban management. Urban Management Quarterly, 2(8), 42-55. [In Persian]
Sheikhi, H, Bronk, F, Zangishei, S. (2021), ]Local development and community-oriented facilitation approach (Jafarabad neighborhood) [, Future Cities Vision, 2(1), 61-75. [In Persian]
Shirvani, H. (2018). Urban design process. (Translated by Ostadi, M. Malek, F), Fekre No Publication. [In Persian]
Silva, P. (2016). Tactical urbanism: Towards an evolutionary cities’ approach? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(6), 1040–1051.
Stelzle, B. Rainer Noennig, J. (2017). A Database for Participation Methods in Urban Development, Procedia Computer Science, Volume 112, 2416-2425.
Strauss, A, Corbin, J. (2014). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. (translated by A. Afshar). Nashr_e Ney publication. [In Persian]
Talen, E. (1997). Success, failure, and conformance: an alternative approach to planning evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 1997, volume 24, pages 573 – 587.
Zangiabadi, A, Abdollahi, M, Salek, R, Ghasemzade, B. (2014). Evaluating the factors affecting the unrealization of comprehensive urban plans in Iran and the related challenges, Research and Urban planning, 5(18), 58-41. [In Persian]