نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.

10.22034/urbs.2024.139994.4986

چکیده

بازآفرینی شهری به­‌مثابه رهیافتی توانمند برای برون‌رفت از جریان زوال پهنه‌های ناکارآمد شهرها، به‌رغم اقبال نسبی در پژوهش‌های شهرسازی ایران طی دهه گذشته، به‌ندرت با نگاهی جامع نگریسته شده است؛ در این پژوهش نحوه ترکیب ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های بازآفرینی شهری طی دهه 1390 در مقالات نشریات علمی‌پژوهشی شهرسازی و چگونگی نگرش پژوهشگران به آن بررسی‌شده‌است. پژوهش، با رویکرد کیفی و به روش استدلال استقرایی در سه فاز انجام شده است. نخست، با استفاده از مطالعه اسنادی، مؤلفه‌ها و ابعاد بازآفرینی شهری استخراج گردید. سپس به مدد شاخص روایی محتوایی و نظر کارشناسان، ابعاد و مؤلفه‌‌های مرتبط ثبت و تأیید شدند. در فاز دوم به کمک انتخاب نظام‌مند، مقالات مرتبط با بازآفرینی شهری انتخاب و با استفاده از نرم‌افزار MaxQda2020 و VOSviewerتحلیل محتوای کیفی صورت گرفت. نهایتاً با استفاده از یافته­های پژوهش، مدل مفهومی پژوهش تدوین شد. بر اساس یافته­ها، ابعاد اجتماع، اقتصاد و فرهنگ و مؤلفه‌های مشارکت اجتماعی، اقتصاد شهر و محله و میراث‌ فرهنگی بیشترین میزان توجه و مشارکت را در ترکیب محتوای ساختار پژوهش­ها داشته‌ و ابعاد محیط­زیست، مدیریت و قانون و مؤلفه­های قوانین و مقررات و آلاینده‌های زیست‌محیطی کمترین میزان توجه را داشته­اند. با توجه به نتایج، در دهه گذشته دو رویکرد کاربست اقتصادیِ میراث‌ فرهنگی به‌منظور رونق اقتصادی و با هدف نهایی رونق اجتماعی پهنه‌های ناکارآمد شهرها و بهره‌بردن از بالقوگی‌های اجتماعی پهنه‌های شهری به منظور احیای حیات آنها بیشترین میزان توجه را داشته‌اند. بنابراین پیشنهاد می‌گردد به‌منظور افزایش بهره‌وری پژوهش‌ها، رویکردی متعادل با بهره‌گیری از هر دو نو نگرش اتخاذ گردد که در این میان توجه به قابلیت رویدادهای شهری به‌مثابه مفهومی مرتبط با هر دو جنبه راهگشاست. به علاوه، انطباق چارچوب سیاست‌گذاری بازآفرینی شهری در ایران با کلان نظریات وحدت‌بخش همچون نظریه شهر رویدادمدار، نظریه شهر ایرانی‌اسلامی و نظریه ایرانشهر می‌تواند منجر به موفقیت آنها در چارچوب برنامه‌های توسعه در ایران گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Exploring the role of urban regeneration dimensions and components on enhancing the condition of inefficient historical fabrics in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Reza Alishahi 1
  • Najma Esmailpoor 2

1 Department of Urbanism, School of Art and Architecture, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

2 Department of Urbanism, School of Art and Architecture, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Highlights

Leveraging economic potential from cultural heritage and community engagement are key strategies for regenerating Iran's deteriorated historic areas.
Urban events provide a link between culture-based and community-driven approaches to regeneration.
Aligning regeneration policies with holistic frameworks enhances the success of revitalization efforts in Iran's historic urban areas.

 
Introduction
In recent years, urban regeneration has gained significant prominence as an approach in urban preservation and revitalization, aiming to transform abandoned or underutilized urban spaces. This approach not only seeks to restore these areas but also fosters economic growth, improves competitiveness, promotes sustainable development, strengthens cultural identity, enhances citizens' quality of life, and advances urban management practices. Despite extensive research on urban regeneration, few studies have holistically examined the integration of its dimensions and components. This study aims to investigate the role of various dimensions and components of urban regeneration in enhancing Iran’s deteriorated historic areas.
Theoretical Framework
Urban regeneration entails a series of actions aimed at improving life quality in economically, socially, culturally, or infrastructurally deprived areas by mobilizing local assets and fostering civic participation. As an interventionist strategy, it works to modernize and revitalize these spaces, paving the way for sustainable urban futures. In Iran, the past decade has seen urban regeneration initiatives attempting to tackle urban inefficiency and developmental challenges. Key milestones in this journey include the 2014 "National Strategy Document on Revitalizing, Upgrading, Renovating, and Enabling Deteriorated and Underutilized Urban Fabrics" and the 2018 "Executive Bylaw of the National Sustainable Urban Regeneration Program."
These policies aim to strengthen urban governance, alleviate poverty, enrich cultural identity, and enhance urban resilience. Yet, misalignment between policy frameworks and real-world conditions, combined with the absence of concrete action plans, has hindered progress toward these objectives. Urban regeneration encompasses a wide range of dimensions—social, cultural, economic, design, management and law, and environmental—each containing specific elements intended to rejuvenate urban spaces and improve residents' quality of life. As such, urban regeneration serves not only as a tool for physical transformation but as a comprehensive and sustainable development strategy.
Methodology
This study employed a three-phase qualitative approach. In the first phase, a literature review was conducted to identify relevant dimensions and components, validated through the Content Validity Index (CVI); items with a CVI score below 0.79 were excluded. Twenty-two experts participated in the CVI assessment. In the second phase, a systematic review of articles from 2011 to 2021 yielded 28 studies on urban regeneration, which were analyzed using MaxQDA 2020. The content analysis produced 111 open codes, 38 components, and 6 dimensions. The study's reliability was confirmed through Cohen’s kappa coefficient, and VOSviewer was used to visualize spatial relationships among the elements.
Results and Discussion
The findings reveal that, throughout the 2010s, the social, economic, and cultural dimensions have been most emphasized in urban regeneration studies. The social dimension was the most prominent, with a particular focus on social participation and social vitality, which are essential for empowering communities and enhancing urban spaces. Within the economic dimension, the neighborhood and urban economy components were the most frequently highlighted, underscoring their role in improving economic conditions. The cultural dimension, meanwhile, was dominated by an emphasis on cultural heritage. Over 70% of the reviewed studies incorporated a mix of social, economic, and cultural dimensions, aiming to boost tourism and, in turn, the economic and social well-being of urban areas by capitalizing on cultural heritage and attracting investments.
Conclusion
Urban regeneration studies generally pursue two main goals to address urban decay and inefficiency: revitalizing the economic and social aspects of declining areas by activating existing community potentials, emphasizing social participation and its links to neighborhood and urban economies; and utilizing cultural assets for economic revival and rebranding, with a focus on authenticity and heritage. Future research should investigate the synergy of these approaches, especially the role of urban events as a connecting force between social and cultural regeneration.
Comparing these findings with Iran's urban regeneration policy framework reveals alignment with the overarching research objectives and the vision of improving residents' living conditions. However, insufficient attention to environmental, managerial, and legal dimensions in the policies may have contributed to their limited success during Iran’s fifth and sixth development plans. Aligning the policy framework with comprehensive theories—such as eventful cities and Iranian-Islamic urbanism—could increase the effectiveness of development goals.
This study focuses on the role of urban regeneration dimensions and components in improving Iran’s obsolete historical fabrics, drawing on Farsi-language articles from the 2010s. Primarily analyzing Ministry-approved urban planning journal articles, this research highlights the need for broader source inclusion in future studies to deepen the understanding of urban regeneration. The findings serve as a basis for identifying research challenges and gaps in this field, guiding policymakers and professionals toward more effective strategies for revitalizing historic urban areas.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Systematic Review
  • Urban Regeneration
  • Scientific-Research Articles
  • Obsolete Historical Fabrics in Iran
Aitken, D. J. (2015). Trust and participation in urban regeneration. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University.
Bellala, A., & Manel, Z. A. (2017). Natural Heritage as a Structure for Urban Regeneration: Case of the El Harrach River. International Journal of Sustainable Land Use and Urban Planning, 3(3), 8-14. https:/doi.org/10.24102/ijslup.v3i3.737
Benneworth, P. (2016). Tensions in university–community engagement: Creative economy, urban regeneration and social justice.  Higher Education and the Creative Economy, London:Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315688305
Blessi, G. T., Tremblay, D.-G., Sandri, M., & Pilati, T. (2012). New trajectories in urban regeneration processes: Cultural capital as source of human and social capital accumulation–Evidence from the case of Tohu in Montreal. Cities, 29(6), 397-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.12.001
Blessi, G. T., Grossi, E., Sacco, P. L., Pieretti, G., & Ferilli, G. (2016). The contribution of cultural participation to urban well-being. A comparative study in Bolzano/Bozen and Siracusa, Italy. Cities, 50, 216-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.10.009
Boussaa, D. (2018). Urban Regeneration and the Search for Identity in Historic Cities. Sustainability, 10(1), Article 48, 1-16. https:/doi.org/10.3390/su10010048
Bragaglia, F., & Caruso, N. (2022). Temporary uses: a new form of inclusive urban regeneration or a tool for neoliberal policy?. Urban Research & Practice, 15(2), 194-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2020.1775284
Cancellieri, G., Turrini, A., Perez, M. J. S., Noelia, S.-A., Jeanet, K., & Cognat, A. S. (2018). Social innovation in arts and culture: place regeneration initiatives driven by arts and culture to achieve social cohesion. In Social innovation: comparative perspectives (pp. 79-103). New York : Routledge .
Castelblanco, G., Guevara, J., Mesa, H., & Hartmann, A. (2022). Social legitimacy challenges in toll road PPP programs: Analysis of the Colombian and Chilean cases. Journal of management in engineering, 38(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001010
Chen, J. L., Pellegrini, P., & Wang, H. Q. (2022). Comparative Residents' Satisfaction Evaluation for Socially Sustainable Regeneration-The Case of Two High-Density Communities in Suzhou. Land, 11(9), Article 1483, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091483
Chen, W. X., Cheshmehzangi, A., Mangi, E., Heath, T., Ye, C. D., & Wang, L. (2022). An Analysis of Residents' Social Profiles Influencing Their Participation in Community Micro-Regeneration Projects in China: A Case Study of Yongtai Community, Guangzhou. Land, 11(6), Article 790, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060790
Cohen, J. (1960). A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
Coletti, R., & Rabbiosi, C. (2021). Neighbourhood branding and urban regeneration: performing the 'right to the brand' in Casilino, Rome. Urban Research & Practice, 14(3), 264-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2020.1730946
Comunian, R., & Mould, O. (2014). The weakest link: Creative industries, flagship cultural projects and regeneration. City, culture and society, 5(2), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2014.05.004
Corticelli, R., Pazzini, M., Mazzoli, C., Lantieri, C., Ferrante, A., & Vignali, V. (2022). Urban Regeneration and Soft Mobility: The Case Study of the Rimini Canal Port in Italy. Sustainability, 14(21), Article 14529, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114529
Council of Ministers of Iran. (2018). Executive Bylaw of the National Sustainable Urban Regeneration Program. Tehran: Presidential Administration of Iran. [in Persian]
Crescenzo, M., De Matteis, S., Bottero, M., Berta, M., & Ferretti, V. (2018). An embedded mixed-methods approach to evaluating regeneration strategies for the historic center of Trieste. Integrated Evaluation for the Management of Contemporary Cities: Results of SIEV 2016, Seminar of the Italian Society of Property Evaluation and Investment Decision, Rome, Italy: 133-147. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-78271-3_11
Gaffikin, F., Mooney, S., & Morrissey, M. (1991). Planning for a change in Belfast: the urban economy, urban regeneration and the Belfast Urban Area Plan 1988. The Town Planning Review, 62(4), 415-430.
https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.62.4.p274452806521674
Galvin, M., & Simmie, G. M. (2017). Theorising participation in urban regeneration partnerships: an adult education perspective. Journal of Education Policy, 32(6), 809-831. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1320731
Habibi, S. M., & Maghsoudi, M. (2010). Urban Renovation: International Definitions, Theories, Experiences, Charters & Declarations, Urban Methods and Operations. Tehran: Tehran Univesity press. [in Persian]
Iranian Urban Development and Revitalization Corporation. (2014a). Comprehensive Framework for Sustainable Urban Regeneration. Tehran:  Ministry of Roads and Urban Development of Iran. [in Persian]
Iranian Urban Development and Revitalization Corporation. (2014b). National Strategy Document on Revitalising, Upgrading, Renovating and Enabling Deteriorated Underutilised Urban Fabrics. Tehran:  Ministry of Roads and Urban Development of Iran. [in Persian]
Izadi, M. S., & Feyzi, R. (2012). A comprehensive and integrated vision and action targeting deprived urban neighbourhoods. HAFTSHAHR, 3(33,34), 73-80. [in Persian]
Izadi, P., Hadiyani, Z., Hajinejad, A., & Ghaderi, J. (2020). Analysis of the role of inter-agency Synergy in Urban regeneration by Using the Network Analysis Approach (Case study: district 8 of Shiraz municipality). Human Geography Research, 52(1), 241-261. https:/doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2018.251051.1007628  [in Persian]
Kearns, A., & Turok, I. (2000). Power, responsibility, and governance in Britain's new urban policy. Journal of Urban Affairs, 22(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2166.00049
Knapp, T. R., & Brown, J. K. (1995). Ten measurement commandments that often should be broken. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(5), 465-469. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180511
Knippschild, R., & Zöllter, C. (2021). Urban regeneration between cultural heritage preservation and revitalization: experiences with a decision support tool in eastern Germany. Land, 10(6), Article 547, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060547
Lak, A., Sharifi, A., Khazaei, M., & Aghamolaei, R. (2021). Towards a framework for driving sustainable urban regeneration with ecosystem services. Land use policy, 111, 105736, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105736
Lavanya, Y. M. P., Gunawardhana, W. H. T., & Perera, M. T. U. (2021). A resolution framework for post-implementation issues of urban regeneration projects in the city of Colombo, Sri Lanka. Geografia-Malaysian, Journal of Society & Space, 17(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.17576/geo-2021-1703-01
Lawson, L., & Kearns, A. (2014). Rethinking the purpose of community empowerment in neighbourhood regeneration: The need for policy clarity. Local Economy, 29(1-2), 65-81.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094213519307
Lei, H., & Zhou, Y. M. (2022). Conducting Heritage Tourism-Led Urban Renewal in Chinese Historical and Cultural Urban Spaces: A Case Study of Datong. Land, 11(12), Article 2122, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122122
Li, L.-H., Wong, S. K. K., & Cheung, K. S. (2016). Land supply and housing prices in Hong Kong: The political economy of urban land policy. Environment and planning C: Government and policy, 34(5), 981-998. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15614699
Li, S. Y., & Qu, F. (2022). Preserving Authenticity in Urban Regeneration: A Framework for the New Definition from the Perspective of Multi-Subject Stakeholders-A Case Study of Nantou in Shenzhen, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), Article 9135. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159135
Mahmoud, I. H., Morello, E., Vona, C., Benciolini, M., Sejdullahu, I., Trentin, M., & Pascual, K. H. (2021). Setting the Social Monitoring Framework for Nature-Based Solutions Impact: Methodological Approach and Pre-Greening Measurements in the Case Study from CLEVER Cities Milan. Sustainability, 13(17), Article 9672, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179672
McCarthy, J. (2010). Social justice and urban regeneration policy in Scotland. Urban Research & Practice, 3(3),  241-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2010.524416
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276-282. https:/doi.org/10.11613/bm.2012.031
Montgomery, J. (2003). Cultural quarters as mechanisms for urban regeneration. Part 1: Conceptualising cultural quarters. Planning, practice & research, 18(4), 293-306. https:/doi.org/10.1080/1561426042000215614
Murtagh, B. (2013). Urban regeneration and the social economy. In The Routledge Companion to Urban Regeneration (pp. 219-228). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108581
Oh, C., & Sim, J. (2022). Effectiveness of Public Partnerships in Non-Urban Regeneration Projects in Korea: Seeing through Place-Keeping Theory. Sustainability, 14(8), Article 4845, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084845
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., & Brennan, S. E. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj, 372: 1-7. https:/doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pinto, M. R., Viola, S., Onesti, A., & Ciampa, F. (2020). Artists residencies, challenges and opportunities for communities’ empowerment and heritage regeneration. Sustainability, 12(22), Article 9651, 1-20. https:/doi.org/10.3390/su12229651
Punter, J. (2007). Design-led regeneration? Evaluating the design outcomes of Cardiff Bay and their implications for future regeneration and design. Journal of Urban design, 12(3), 375-405. https:/doi.org/10.1080/13574800701602510
Roberts, P., & Sykes, H. (1999). Urban regeneration: a handbook. New York: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446219980
Ros-García, J. M. (2022). The Study of Quality of Life as a Guide to Urban Regeneration Analysis of Estepona’s New City Hall as a Sustainable Model. Buildings, 12(10), Article 1699, 1-27. https:/doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101699
Sendra, P., & Fitzpatrick, D. (2020). Community-Led Regeneration: A toolkit for residents and planners. London: UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787356061
Shadar, H., & Shach-Pinsly, D. (2022). From Public Housing to Private Housing: Neglect of Urban Qualities during the Urban Regeneration Process. Land, 11(6), Article 875, 1-17. https:/doi.org/10.3390/land11060875
Smith, A. (2012). Events and urban regeneration: The strategic use of events to revitalise cities. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203136997
Stouten, P. (2016). Urban Design and the Changing Contex of Urban Regeneration in the Netherlands. European Spatial Research and Policy, 23(1), 111-126. https:/doi.org/10.1515/esrp-2016-0006
Tallon, A. (2013). Urban Regeneration in the UK. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351030304
Tang, Y., & Yang, D. (2021). Urban Regeneration in China: Institutional Innovation in Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Shanghai. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003146193
Tanrikul, A., & Hoskara, S. (2019). A New Framework for the Regeneration Process of Mediterranean Historic City Centres. Sustainability, 11(16), Article 4483, 1-19. https:/doi.org/10.3390/su11164483
Taraba, J., Forgaci, C., & Romein, A. (2022). Creativity-driven urban regeneration in the post-socialist context-The case of Csepel Works, Budapest. Journal of Urban design, 27(2), 161-180. https:/doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2021.1951604
Xie, F. Y., Liu, G. W., & Zhuang, T. Z. (2021). A Comprehensive Review of Urban Regeneration Governance for Developing Appropriate Governance Arrangements. Land, 10(5), Article 545, 1-28. https:/doi.org/10.3390/land10050545
Xuili, G., & Maliene, V. (2021). A Review of Studies on Sustainable Urban Regeneration. EPiC Series in Built Environment, ASC 2021. 57th Annual Associated Schools of Construction International Conference, Chico, California, California State University: 615-625. https:/doi.org/10.29007/zsvn
Yang, J. K., Yang, L. C., & Ma, H. T. (2022). Community Participation Strategy for Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Xiamen, China. Land, 11(5), Article 600, 1-14. https:/doi.org/10.3390/land11050600