نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش‌آموخته‌ی کارشناسی ارشد طراحی شهری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

2 استادیار شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

3 استاد شهرسازی، دانشکده شهرسازی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

10.22034/urbs.2024.140295.4997

چکیده

تاکنون در ایران طرح‌های توسعه زیادی با هدف ارتقای کیفیت‌های مکانی تهیه شده است اما معمولاً ارزیابی کیفیت‌‍‌های مکانی به صورت کارشناس‌محور بوده که منجر به افزایش فاصله انتظارات واقعی کاربران با حرفه‌مندان تهیه‌کننده و مجریان طرح شده است که این فاصله به طرق مختلف از جمله مهاجرت ساکنان و به تبع آن اعیان‌سازی بافت بروز پیدا می‌کند. محله آبکوه_ سعدآباد از محلات کهن مشهد با سابقه 400 ساله است که باوجود تهیه سه طرح از سال‌ 1385 شمسی تاکنون نتوانسته کیفیت‌های مکانی خود را در شهر امروز بازیابد. مطالعه حاضر به ضرورت شناسایی کیفیت‌های مکان در بافت‌های ناکارآمد شهری و تفاوت الگوهای ارزیابی از بالا به پایین _کارشناس محور _ با رویکردهای از پایین به بالا در اینگونه بافت ها پرداخته است. از منظر روش‌شناسی، این پژوهش در راستای بررسی پیشینه نظری کیفیت مکان، از روش تحقیق کتابخانه‌ای و تحلیل محتوای کیفی به کمک نرم‌افزار 2018MAXQDA بهره گرفته و در مرحله بعد به منظور فهم ماهیت کیفیت مکان در محله آبکوه و ارزیابی آن، از ترکیبی از رویکردهای پدیدارشناسانه اول شخص و اگزیستانسیالیستی استفاده شده است. نتایج مطالعه حاضر نشان داد که کیفیت مکان در بافت‌های ناکارآمد شهری در پنج بعد ادراکی _ معنایی، کالبدی، اجتماعی _ اقتصادی، عملکردی و محیطی قابل بررسی است؛ اما در محله آبکوه مشهد با توجه به شرایط حقوقی متمایز به ویژه در مسئله مالکیت زمین، بعد حقوقی _ مدیریتی جزو نخستین ابعاد اثرگذار بر ارتقای کیفیت مکان قرار می‌گیرد. علاوه بر این ترتیب اهمیت ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های نظیر هر یک در پدیده آبکوه با مدل عام حاصل از یافته‌های نظری متفاوت است. با مقایسه نتایج پدیدارشناسانه تحقیق با آخرین طرح مصوب این محله که با عنوان طرح «اعتلای کیفیت حیات شهری آبکوه» مشخص شده، طرح تهیه شده برای محله یادشده  با رویکرد ارزیابی از بالا به پایین، نتوانسته به کیفیت‌های مورد هدف خود دست یابد. با توجه به چالش های متفاوت بافت های ناکارآمد شهری که در هر مورد متأثر و جدایی ناپذیر از بستر موجود است، تنها با اتکا به مطالعه نظری و اولویت‌های صاحبان نفوذ نمی‌توان به ارتقای کیفیت مکان دست یافت و استفاده از رویکردهای زمینه‌محور همچون پدیدارشناسی در ارزیابی کیفیت‌های مکان ضروری می‌نماید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Place quality evaluation in deteriorated urban areas: The case of Abkooh neighborhood in Mashhad, Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Golbarg Ghaemmaghami Farahani 1
  • Hooman Ghahremani 2
  • Hossein Bahrainy 3

1 Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

2 Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

3 Faculty of Urban Planning, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Highlights

Emphasizing phenomenological place quality as a more adaptive and responsive evaluation model compared to current top-down urban regeneration strategies.
Advocating a phenomenological approach that reflects the perspectives of residents who experience the place firsthand.
Proposing approaches free from technocratic biases to ensure urban interventions align with the real needs of the community.

 
Introduction
The Abkooh neighborhood, once a rural village west of Mashhad, now faces critical urban challenges that have prompted various interventions aimed at revitalization. Initially, Abkooh was located seven kilometers from Mashhad, remaining a rural area until its formal inclusion within the city limits in 1972 as part of Mashhad’s comprehensive urban development plan. However, as the neighborhood evolved within the expanding city, it experienced substantial socio-economic, physical, and legal issues, largely due to its incompatibility with surrounding urban areas. Legal disputes involving prominent landowners, Astan Quds and Awqaf, have further exacerbated these challenges, deteriorating Abkooh’s quality of life and diminishing its integration with the city. Despite several development plans aimed at reinvigorating its identity, Abkooh today represents a vulnerable urban fabric, lacking essential qualities that contribute to a livable urban environment.Theoretical Framework
Deteriorated urban areas like Abkooh often evolve within a complex historical, social, and economic landscape, yet face structural and functional deficits that limit their livability. Unlike other urban spaces, improving place quality in such areas demands a context-sensitive approach with distinct intervention priorities. In this study, “place” is understood as more than a physical environment; it encompasses the lived experiences, cultural meanings, and social interactions that define it. Place quality, in this sense, refers to an amalgamation of characteristics that not only enhance the physical space but also fulfill residents' needs, improving their quality of life and fostering satisfaction.
The phenomenology of place quality emphasizes the exploration of lived experience, viewing place as a multidimensional concept shaped by social, emotional, and physical factors. Within deteriorated urban areas, this study examines place quality through five main dimensions: perceptual-semantic, physical, socio-economic, functional, and environmental. The phenomenological perspective allows for a more profound understanding of these qualities by considering the personal and collective experiences of residents.
Methodology
This research begins with an extensive review of theoretical approaches to place quality in deteriorated urban areas. The secondary research phase involved analyzing relevant national and international academic works published since 2000 using MAXQDA2018 software. To ensure validity, survey methods and interviews with urban design experts were conducted. The subsequent phase employs a first-person phenomenological approach, aiming to capture the lived experiences within Abkooh.
Over five weeks, researchers conducted site visits twice daily, in the mornings and evenings, each lasting three hours. Observational field notes, semi-structured interviews, audio recordings, and handwritten accounts were used to document resident experiences, drawing upon participant-observation techniques. Qualitative content analysis, supported by MAXQDA2018, enabled the systematic exploration of interview data. Additional data collection methods, including participatory observation, photography, and sketching, were employed to create a comprehensive record of findings.
Results and Discussion
The research findings reveal significant challenges and opportunities within the Abkooh neighborhood regarding place quality. Analyzing these factors through the Abkooh Quality of Urban Life Improvement Plan underscores the limitations of conventional evaluation methods. Specifically, library-based studies or expert-driven priorities alone fail to provide a realistic assessment of place quality in deteriorated urban areas. Phenomenological approaches, which respond to the unique attributes of each location, yield more precise and contextually appropriate insights.
The phenomenological evaluation identified six key dimensions that influence place quality in Abkooh: socio-economic, legal-management, physical, perceptual-semantic, environmental, and functional. Notably, the presence of a legal-management dimension is an essential addition due to the legal complexities surrounding land ownership in Abkooh. Furthermore, findings indicated that the prioritization of these dimensions varied throughout the three phases of research, underscoring the importance of flexible and adaptable strategies in urban intervention.
Conclusion
Effective urban planning in deteriorated neighborhoods like Abkooh must prioritize the relationship between individuals and place, focusing on the unique qualities and challenges of each neighborhood. Understanding place quality necessitates immersing oneself in the essence of the neighborhood without preconceived notions or standardized frameworks. Therefore, each deteriorated urban context must be approached as a unique phenomenon, evaluated through the eyes of its residents rather than solely through expert-driven or theory-based models.
Phenomenological methods highlight the distinctive attributes of place quality that may differ from theoretical or authority-led approaches. Simply relying on checklists and criteria derived from theoretical models or global best practices often fails to capture the complex reality of place quality in deteriorated urban contexts. By focusing on the lived experiences of residents, phenomenological approaches yield a deeper understanding of how urban spaces are perceived and experienced, leading to recommendations that more accurately align with community needs.
Incorporating this resident-centered perspective in planning processes enables cities to develop more inclusive and livable environments that address the specific needs and desires of inhabitants. By preventing gentrification and fostering a sense of belonging, phenomenological approaches encourage long-term resident retention and community cohesion, allowing neighborhoods to evolve without losing their identity.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Phenomenology
  • Deteriorated Urban Areas
  • Abkooh Neighborhood
  • Mashhad
  • Place Quality
 Abusaada, H., & Elshater, A. (2021). Revealing distinguishing factors between Space and Place in urban design literature. Journal of Urban Design, 26(3), 319340. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2020.1832887
 Andrews, C. J. (2001). Analyzing qualityofplace. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(2), 201217. https://doi.org/10.1068/b2714
 Asadpour, A. (2021). Phenomenology of Place: A Framework for the Architectural Interpretation in Visual Arts (Case Study: Sohrab Sepehri's Drawings). International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 11(1), 4760. {in Persian}. https://doi.org/10.30495/ijaud.2021.16767
 Carmona, M. (2014). The placeshaping continuum: A theory of urban design process. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854695
 Carmona, M. (2019). Place value: Place quality and its impact on health, social, economic, and environmental outcomes. Journal of Urban Design, 24(1), 148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1472523
 Castello, L. (2016). Rethinking the meaning of place: conceiving place in architectureurbanism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315606163
 Coates, G. J., & Seamon, D. (1984). Toward a phenomenology of place and placemaking: Interpreting landscape, lifeworld, and aesthetics. Oz, 6(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.4148/23785853.1074
 Cresswell, T. (2009). Place. In N. Thrift, & R. Kitchen (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (Vol. 8, pp. 169177). Elsevier.
 Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
 Durmaz, S. B. (2015). Analyzing the quality of place: Creative clusters in Soho and Beyoğlu. Journal of Urban Design, 20(1), 93124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.972348
 Ebrahimpour, B., & Ostadi, M. (2022). Development of a ConceptualAnalytical Framework for Placemaking with Emphasis on the Linking Places in the Old and Middle Textures of Mashhad. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 14(37), 133149. https://doi.org/10.22034/aaud.2021.204554.2016 {in Persian}
 Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., Yigitcanlar, T., Guaralda, M., & Kamruzzaman, M. D. (2018). Evaluating place quality in innovation districts: A Delphic hierarchy process approach. Land use policy, 76, 471486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.027
 Farnhad Consulting Engineers (2011). The Plan of Improving the Quality of Urban Life in Abkooh. Mashhad Municipality, ViceChancellor of Urban Planning and Architecture.{in Persian}
 Ghanbarpour, M., Heydari, A., Ghanbarpour, A. (2016). Presenting an integrated model of the definition and dimensions of the place identity and determining the indicators that make up the identity; Case Study: residents of Shiraz city. Art and architecture studies. 2(4), 119. {in Persian}
 Ghavampour, E., & Vale, B. (2019). Revisiting the “model of place”: A comparative study of placemaking and sustainability. Urban Planning, 4(2), 196206. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i2.2015
 Golkar, K. (2005). Place Appraisal in Urban Design: An Introduction to Placecheck Technique. Soffeh, 15(40), 2847. {in Persian} https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.1683870.1384.15.2.4.2
 Golkar, K. (2008). DesignOriented Urban Design; PolicyOriented Urban Design: Model Terms of References for Guiding Instruments in Iran. Soffeh, 17(46), 5166. {in Persian} https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.1683870.1387.17.2.11.7
 Haghi, M., & Pouralikhani, M. (2019). Assessing the Level of Citizens' Satisfaction with Urban Environmental Quality (Case Study: Hamedan City). Journal of Environmental Studies, 45(2), 287300. {in Persian} https://doi.org/10.22059/jes.2019.260081.1007681
 Hosseini, A., Kahaki, F. S., & Ahadi, Z. (2022). Explaining the importance of place quality in urban regeneration with a future studies approach, The case study on District 10 of Tehran. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 9(4), 957980. {in Persian} https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.325724.1538
 Karimi Yazdi, A., Barati, N., & zarei, M. (2019). An inquiry into Qualitative norms of place perception in the experience of urban space revitalization in Emamzadeh Saleh, Tajrish, Tehran. Motaleate Shahri, 8(32), 89104. {in Persian} doi: 10.34785/J011.2019.509
 Kloosterman, R. C., & Trip, J. J. (2011). Planning for quality? Assessing the role of quality of place in current Dutch planning practice. Journal of Urban Design, 16(4), 455470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2011.585863
 Knobel Guelar, P. (2020). Urban Green Space and Human Health: the Role of Quality Characteristics.
 Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., Türk, U., & Wahlstrom, M. (2022). City love and place quality assessment of liveable and loveable neighborhoods in Rotterdam. Land Use Policy, 119, 106109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106109
 Lennon, M. (2020). The art of inclusion: phenomenology, placemaking and the role of the arts. Journal of Urban Design, 25(4), 449466. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2020.1717331
 Lynch, K. (1981). Good city form. MIT Press.
 Mahmoodi, A. (2021). Strategic planning for regeneration of inefficient urban fabric. Journal of Engineering & Construction Management, 6(3), 814. {in Persian}
 Matkan, A.A., Pourahmad, A., Mansourian, H., Mirbagheri, B., & Hosseini Asl, A.. (2010). Measuring the Quality of Urban Places by Using Multicriteria Evaluation Method in GIS (Case Study: Tehran City). Remote Sensing & Gis, 1(4), 120. {in Persian}
 Menin, S. (Ed.). (2004). Constructing place: mind and the matter of placemaking. Routledge.
 Mirzaei, Sh, Teimouri, S, & Sattari, S. (2011). Sense of Place and Identity Creation (Case Study: Bazaar Kermanshah). National Studies, 13(2 (50)), 121141. {in Persian}
 Ministry of Roads and Urban Planning. (2013). National strategic document for revitalization, improvement, renovation, and empowerment of declining and inefficient urban fabrics.
 Modiri, A. (2008). Place. Hoviateshahr, 2(2), 6979. {in Persian}
 Mohammadpour, A. (2012). Qualitative research method; logic and design in qualitative methodology and practical steps and procedures in qualitative methodology. Publications of sociologists, second edition. {in Persian}
 Moran, D. (2002). Introduction to phenomenology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203196632
 Mostafavi Saheb, S., Sasanpour, F., Movahed, A., and Shamaie, A. (2014). Environmental quality assessment in urban neighborhoods and planning for a sustainable environment (case study: Saqqez city neighborhoods). Regional urban studies and research, 6 (24), 126.
 Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
 Negintaji, S, Ansari, M, & Pourmand, H. (2018). Explanation of The Relationship Between Human and Place in Architecture Design Process by a Phenomenological Approach. MemariVaShahrsazi (HonarhayeZiba), 22(4), 7180. {in Persian} https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2018.200203.671327
 Pakzad, J. (2019). Alphabet of spatial qualities for designers, first edition, Armanshahr Publications. {in Persian}
 Pancholi, S., Yigitcanlar, T., & Guaralda, M. (2018). Attributes of successful placemaking in knowledge and innovation spaces: evidence from Brisbane’s Diamantina knowledge precinct. Urban Design, 119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1454259
 Parsnia, A. (2016). Identification and spatial mapping of quality in the urban environment; Case study: the historical and cultural center of Mashhad, master's thesis in urban regional planning and design, Islamic Azad University, Tehran central branch. {in Persian}
 Partoei, P. (2012). Phenomenology of place: principles and methodology, doctoral thesis in the field of urban planning, University of Tehran, Faculty of Fine Arts. {in Persian}
 Pourahmad, A, Keshavarz, M, Aliakbari, E, & Hadavi, F. (2017). Sustainable Regeneration Urban Distressed Area, Case Study: (District 10, Tehran City). EnvironmentalBased Territorial Planning (Amayesh), 10(37), 167194. {in Persian}
 Pourjafar, M, Pormand, H, Zabihi, H, Hashemi Demneh, L, & Taban, M. (2011). Phenomenology of identity and place in historical context. Journal of studies on Iranian Islamic city, 1(3), 1120. {in Persian}
 Rafiean, M., Rafieian, M., & Bemanian, M. R. (2019). Investigating the Quality of Meaning of Urban Public Places in the Perceptions of Yazd's Citizens. International Journal of Architectural Engineering & Urban Planning, 29(1), 9198. {in Persian} https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2017.225301.1007389
 Seamon, D. (2000). Phenomenology، place، environment، and architecture: A review of the literature. Phenomenology Online, 129.
 Sepe, M. (2015). Urban Happiness and Public Space.
 Shahr_e_Ziba Khavaran consulting engineers (2019). Abkooh neighborhood development plan. {in Persian}
 Sholeh, M, Lotfi, S, & Kian, F. (2018). Application Of ‘Place Design Quality Indicator’ (PDQI) Method in The Comparative Assessment of Historic and Cultural Urban Spaces Case Study: Two HistoricCultural Places in Historic Urban Fabric of Shiraz. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 9(19), 113132. {in Persian}
 Stephenson, J. (2010). People and place. Planning Theory & Practice, 11(1), 921. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903549878
 Taban, M, Pourjafar, M, & Pourmand, H. (2012). Identity and Place, Phenomenological Approach. Hoviateshahr, 6(10), 7990. {in Persian}
 Trip, J. J. (2007). Assessing the quality of place: a comparative analysis of Amsterdam and Rotterdam. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(5), 501517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14679906.2007.00362.x
 Trip, J. J. (2007). What makes a city? Planning for quality of place': The case of highspeed train station area development (Vol. 12). IOS press.
 Ujang, N., & Zakariya, K. (2015). The Notion of Place, Place Meaning and Identity in Urban Regeneration. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 709717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.073