نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
استاد بازنشسته، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
روندهای ناپایدارسازی در توسعة کشور فراگیر شده تا جایی که تعادلهای اجتماعی و اکولوژیک را برهم زده است. بسیاری از این روندها (مانند کاهش سرانة آب، آلودگی محیطی، افزایش بیکاری، شکافهای قومیتی، فقرزایی و حاشیهنشینی) فضامند بوده و سوءتوسعة فضایی را بهویژه در مناطق شهری موجب شدهاند. اگرچه نمیتوان عوامل سببساز این وضعیت را تنها در بعد فضایی بررسی نمود ولی در چارچوب برنامهریزی فضایی میتوان با تکیه بر فضا همچون بستر مشترک و برهمکنش پدیدهها، برای پایداری جامعه بهسهم خود چارهجویی کرد. در این کندوکاو برای احتراز از افزونگی مشکلات، دستوپا زدن در محدودیت دانش کنونی و ناتوانی در پاسخ ریشهای، روش پژوهشِ مسئلهمندسازی بهکار میآید. با این روش، امکانِ یافتن بنیادهای مسئلهزایی موضوع پژوهش با اندیشهای انتقادی نسبت به هستیشناسی و معرفتشناسی متداول فراهم میشود و در ادامه، بینش بدیلی بهدست میآید که کنش متفاوتی برای برنامهریزی فضایی از آن استنتاج میشود. در این راستا، نوشتار حاضر کوششی فرضیهای در دوسطح عام و خاص برای درک مسئلهمندیِ تولید فضای ناپایدار در ایران نموده است که مبنای پیشنهاد رهیافت برنامهریزی فضایی دگرگونساز برای پایداری بدین شرح شده است: زُدایشِ تولید و توسعة فضایی ناپایدار کنونی ایران در گرو تولید فضا بر بنیان انگارة توسعهای بهگونة دیگر است که آمیزهای از سنتهای روزآمد شدة ایرانشهری (حکمت و تجربة زیستة ماندگاری تمدن ایران) با علم و تجارب پایداری جهانی بوده و بر مبنای مشارکت دربرگیرندة همگان در واحدهای اجتماعات محلی است. در این فرآیند، بنا بر ارزشهای پایداری اجتماعی و اکولوژیک در شرایط بحران و کاهش منابع زیستی، نهادسازی فضایی میشود تا برای پذیرش و استمرار دگرگونیها، اجتماعات محلی همراهی و عاملیت داشته باشند. مهم اینست که برنامهریزان فضایی همچون کارگزارانِ دگرگونی بزرگ، فضای همگانیِ برانگیزانندة همکنشِ اجتماعی و همبستگی جمعی را مکانسازی نمایند و در سازماندهیهای سطوح مختلف فضایی، منطقِ اجتماعی_اکولوژیک را بر منطقِ اقتصادی_مهندسی اولویت دهند.
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Approach of Transformative Spatial Planning for Iran's Sustainability
نویسنده [English]
- Mozaffar Sarrafi
Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Highlights
Iran is experiencing a multidimensional crisis of unsustainability across environmental, social, economic, physical, and institutional spatial domains.
Spatial underdevelopment is not merely technical or sectoral but a paradigmatic outcome of a dominant development discourse.
Conventional spatial planning in Iran has focused on managing existing conditions rather than enabling normative, future-oriented change.
This study employs a problematization-based approach to interrogate the foundations of unsustainable spatial production.
A transformative spatial planning framework is proposed, grounded in an alternative development paradigm integrating Iranian civilizational wisdom with global sustainability knowledge.
Local communities, spatial institutionalization, and the prioritization of socio-ecological rationality over economic–engineering logic are identified as key drivers of sustainable transformation.
Introduction
Over recent decades, Iran has experienced accelerating processes of unsustainability that have disrupted social and ecological equilibria. Declining water availability, environmental degradation, unemployment, spatial inequality, poverty, marginalization, and socio-cultural fragmentation have become persistent features of national development trajectories. Many of these challenges are inherently spatial, materializing most visibly in urban regions through polarized development patterns, informal settlements, environmental risks, and declining quality of life.
Although the roots of these crises cannot be reduced solely to spatial factors, spatial planning offers a critical and integrative lens for addressing them. Space constitutes the arena where social, economic, ecological, and institutional processes intersect. Unlike sectoral approaches, spatial planning can integrate these dimensions and contribute to more inclusive and sustainable outcomes.
Nevertheless, prevailing spatial planning practices in Iran have largely been reactive, focusing on regulation within an already problematic development paradigm. Rarely have these practices questioned the assumptions shaping development itself. This paper argues that Iran’s pervasive unsustainability results from a dominant paradigm that must be critically challenged and replaced. As a public and normative practice, spatial planning has a central role in facilitating this shift. Accordingly, the study examines the problematics of spatial development in Iran and proposes a transformative spatial planning approach oriented toward sustainability.
Theoretical Framework
The study is grounded in critical spatial theory, particularly the understanding of space as a socially produced and productive phenomenon. Following Lefebvre, space is conceptualized not as a neutral container but as a dialectical construct shaped by social relations and shaping them in return. Socio-economic processes are inherently spatial, and spatial configurations actively condition social outcomes.
Within this framework, spatial development is interpreted as an expression of dominant development paradigms. Under global capitalism, space has increasingly become a medium for capital accumulation rather than a foundation for collective life. This transformation has produced commodification, socio-spatial polarization, social exclusion, and ecological degradation, particularly in the Global South. Iran’s contemporary spatial development broadly follows this logic, shaped by oil-based revenues, centralized governance, weak civil society, and rent-seeking practices in urban land and housing markets. Sustainability, by contrast, is defined as living within ecological limits while ensuring equitable satisfaction of social needs. Achieving sustainability requires transforming prevailing development paradigms and their spatial manifestations. When grounded in a holistic understanding of space, spatial planning can mediate between socio-ecological values and spatial organization.
Methodology
This research adopts a qualitative and conceptual methodology based on the approach of problematization. Rather than treating unsustainable spatial outcomes as isolated technical deficiencies, problematization interrogates the assumptions, discourses, and knowledge systems through which such outcomes have been normalized and reproduced.
Drawing on the works of Foucault, Freire, and contemporary critical scholars, this approach challenges dominant ontological and epistemological foundations of spatial development. The analysis seeks to reveal how specific development logics have continuously generated unsustainable spatial patterns in Iran. It operates at two analytical levels: a general level situating Iran within global development dynamics, and a contextual level examining historically and institutionally embedded spatial practices. This dual perspective provides the basis for articulating an alternative, transformative spatial planning approach.
Results and Discussion
The findings indicate that unsustainable spatial development in Iran emerges from the convergence of global capitalist spatial logics and country-specific institutional conditions. At the general level, alignment with a globalized, capital-driven development paradigm has led to the commodification of urban space, the prioritization of exchange value over use value, and increasing socio-spatial polarization.
At the contextual level, oil-based revenues, centralized governance, weak participatory mechanisms, and limited institutional accountability have intensified rent-seeking behaviors in spatial development. These dynamics have produced rapid urban growth disconnected from ecological capacity, cultural continuity, and social equity. Traditional Iranian spatial practices, historically adapted to ecological constraints such as water scarcity, have largely been abandoned, resulting in a rupture between space, culture, and environment.
Conventional spatial planning has been unable to counteract these trends due to its technocratic orientation and subordination to dominant power structures. The analysis suggests that sustainability cannot be achieved through incremental reforms within the existing paradigm. Instead, a transformative approach is required, one that redefines spatial planning from a tool for managing growth to a practice aimed at enabling socio-ecological resilience and collective well-being.
Conclusion
The paper proposes a transformative spatial planning approach for sustainability in Iran based on an alternative development paradigm. This approach emphasizes the integration of renewed Iranian civilizational wisdom with contemporary global sustainability knowledge. Central to this vision are inclusive participation, spatial institutionalization, and the empowerment of local communities as active agents of change.
Transformative spatial planning prioritizes socio-ecological rationality over economic–engineering logics, strengthens local governance structures, expands shared public spaces, and fosters social learning processes. Rather than responding reactively to existing problems, it seeks to proactively generate spaces aligned with long-term sustainability objectives.
Iran currently stands at a critical historical juncture. Without a fundamental reorientation of spatial development practices, existing crises are likely to deepen. Spatial planners, as agents of transformation, bear a significant responsibility in shaping alternative futures. By adopting critically informed, normative, and forward-looking planning practices, they can contribute to the production of sustainable spaces and to a more equitable and resilient society.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- Spatial Planning
- Sustainability
- Problematic
- Production of Space
- Another Development
)