نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام‌خمینی (ره)، قزوین، ایران.

2 کارشناس ارشد برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام‌خمینی(ره)، قزوین، ایران.

چکیده

با گسترش روزافزون شهرنشینی و تغییرات ساختاری در کالبد شهری، کیفیت محیط‌زیست شهری به‌ویژه وضعیت آلودگی هوا به یکی از چالش‌های جدی کلانشهرها تبدیل شده است. در این میان، علاوه بر شرایط جوی، حجم تردد وسایل نقلیه، ویژگی‌های طبیعی زمین و ... شیوه سازمان‌یابی فضاهای شهری و ویژگی‌های مورفولوژیک آن نیز بر الگوهای انتشار آلاینده‌ها اثرگذار است؛ بنابراین هدف از انجام این پژوهش، بررسی ارتباط میان شاخص‌های فرم شهری در 22 منطقه شهر تهران و نوع و میزان آلاینده های هواست. به همین منظور پس از تعریف و انتخاب شاخص‌ها و سنجه‌های فرم شهری (22 شاخص که در ابعاد طراحی محیط، کاربری زمین، دسترسی و تراکم مشخص شده‌اند) میزان کمی هر شاخص در 22 منطقه شهر تهران محاسبه شد. سپس از طریق داده‌های شرکت کنترل کیفیت هوا، میانگین سالانه غلظت آلاینده‌های هوا (CO، O3، PM2.5، NO2، SO2) در بازه زمانی یکسال- از ابتدای فروردین سال 1403 تا اول فروردین 1404-  محاسبه گردید. روش پژوهش بر پایه روش همبستگی پیرسون است، به این صورت که به کمک نرم‌افزار SPSS، همبستگی هریک از شاخص‌های فرم شهری با انواع آلاینده‌های هوا به دست آمد. نتایج این همبستگی ها نشان داد شاخص‌های تراکم واحدهای مسکونی، تراکم ناخالص جمعیتی، سطح ساخته شده از منطقه، مساحت کاربری‌های غیرمسکونی، تراکم واحدهای خرده‌فروشی، خدمات محلی، ریزدانگی، مسافت طی شده، منابع آلودگی و تعداد تقاطع با آلاینده‌ها، رابطه همبستگی داشتند که از نظر آماری نیز معنادار بودند. این نتیجه حاکی از آن است که الگوهای طراحی فضای شهری و فرم شهری، نقش معناداری در تغییرات آلودگی هوا و کیفیت هوا، به خصوص در 22 منطقه شهر تهران ایفا می‌کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Impact of Urban Form Indicators on Air Pollution levels (Case Study: of Tehran’s 22 Districts)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zeinab Adeli 1
  • Azin pirasteh 2

1 Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

2 Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Highlights

Comprehensive Assessment: Systematic, multi-scalar analysis of the correlation between 22 distinct urban form indicators and primary air pollutants across all 22 administrative districts of Tehran.
Spatial Determinism: Empirical confirmation of the decisive role of urban spatial structure and morphological patterns in modulating air quality variations.

 
Introduction
Despite occupying less than three percent of the Earth’s surface, contemporary cities are the primary drivers of anthropogenic pollution, exposing a vast global population to hazardous air quality with severe public health and economic repercussions. While vehicular emissions and fossil fuel consumption are the dominant sources of atmospheric pollutants, local climatic conditions, complex topography, and—critically—urban form exert a profound influence on pollutant dispersion and concentration. Recent scholarship has increasingly focused on the nexus between urban morphology and air quality, suggesting that land-use patterns and spatial configurations can significantly attenuate or exacerbate the accumulation of pollutants. However, much of the extant research has been geographically limited or focused on restricted sets of environmental indicators.
Tehran, as a rapidly expanding megacity characterized by industrial development, high population density, and intensive motorized transport, serves as a critical case study for this environmental challenge. This research aims to investigate the complex relationship between various urban form indicators and air pollution levels across Tehran’s 22 districts. Specifically, the study seeks to answer: What are the primary morphological indicators affecting air quality, and what are the specific correlations between these urban form dimensions and major pollutants (CO, O₃, NO₂, SO₂, and PM2.5)? This understanding is essential for shifting towards more sustainable urban planning paradigms.
Theoretical Framework
This study conceptualizes the city as a dynamic system where physical form and environmental processes are inextricably linked. The research operationalizes urban form through 22 metrics categorized into four strategic dimensions: environmental design, land use, accessibility, and density. By meticulously calculating the quantitative values of these metrics for each district, the study provides a robust empirical basis for evaluating the spatial distribution and intensity of pollutants.
The correlation between these indicators and annual pollutant concentrations is analyzed to assess how spatial and design configurations influence urban environmental performance. This research adopts an applied analytical approach, utilizing quantitative spatial data to delineate the association between the dense urban fabric of Tehran and the magnitude of pollutants. Pearson’s correlation coefficient is employed as the primary statistical tool to establish the strength, direction, and structural significance of these bivariate dependencies. By integrating concepts from urban morphology and environmental science, this research offers a comprehensive understanding of how strategic spatial interventions can be leveraged to enhance urban environmental resilience.
Methodology
This research is an applied study utilizing a quantitative-statistical approach. The primary objective is to analyze the correlation between urban form indicators and air pollution across Tehran’s 22 districts. Data regarding the concentration of pollutants (CO, SO₂, NO, O₃, and PM2.5) were compiled from official air quality monitoring station archives and longitudinal environmental reports.
The indicators of urban form were categorized based on a thorough literature review, followed by the definition of standardized quantitative measures for each. Subsequently, the Pearson correlation test was performed to test the null hypotheses concerning the relationships between independent variables (urban form metrics) and dependent variables (pollutant concentration). This method allows for a clear evaluation of linear relationships within the high-density urban environment of Tehran, facilitating the identification of critical morphological factors that correlate with air quality degradation.
Results and Discussion
The Pearson correlation analysis revealed a diverse range of relationships between urban form and pollutant concentrations. Statistically significant positive correlations were observed between “residential unit density” and pollutants such as CO, SO₂, NO₂, and PM2.5, confirming that high-density residential areas—often associated with increased traffic and energy consumption—are more susceptible to air quality issues. Similar trends were noted for “gross population density” and “distance traveled,” which show a strong positive correlation with SO₂ and NO₂ emissions, underscoring the role of transport and human intensity in pollution cycles.
Conversely, indicators associated with sustainable urban design, such as “public transport network length” and “per capita green space,” demonstrated inverse relationships with several pollutants. For instance, increased green space coverage was negatively correlated with SO₂ and CO levels, suggesting a significant mitigating effect. However, the study also encountered complex nuances; for example, while some indicators like “pedestrian and bicycle path length” showed negative associations with SO₂, they exhibited positive correlations with others, indicating that the impact of urban form on air quality is multifaceted and highly dependent on the specific pollutant under examination.
Conclusion
This study provides empirical evidence that urban form is a fundamental determinant of air pollution distribution. By analyzing 22 morphological indicators, the research confirms that structural characteristics—such as land-use intensity, density, and spatial connectivity—directly influence the accumulation of CO, SO₂, NO₂, and PM2.5. The results suggest that urban air quality is not merely a product of emissions, but also a result of how urban space is organized. Therefore, to mitigate air pollution, urban planners must move beyond traditional emission-control policies and embrace strategic spatial planning. Targeted interventions in density management, the enhancement of green infrastructure, and the optimization of accessibility can act as effective tools for long-term environmental management and sustainability in the Tehran metropolitan area.
Acknowledgment
We sincerely acknowledge all those who provided scientific support for this research.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Air pollution
  • air pollutant concentration
  • urban form
  • Pearson correlation
Adolphe, L. (2001). A simplified model of urban morphology: Application to an analysis of the environmental performance of cities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1068/b2631
Arifwidodo, S. D., & Perera, R. (2011). Quality of life and compact development policies in Bandung, Indonesia. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6(2), 159–179.
Bagley, M. N., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2002). The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: A structural equations modeling approach. The Annals of Regional Science, 36(2), 279–297.
Barati, N., & Sardare, A. A. (2013). The Impact of Urban Form Indicators on Private Car Use and Energy Consumption in Tehran Districts. Baghe Nazar,10(26),3-12. https://www.magiran.com/p1169144[in Persian]
Bart, I. L. (2010). Urban sprawl and climate change: A statistical exploration of cause and effect, with policy options for the EU. Land use policy, 27(2),283-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.03.003
Batty, M. (2008). The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science, 319(5864), 769–771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151419
Bell, J. N. B., Power, S. A., Jarraud, N., Agrawal, M., & Davies, C. (2011). The effects of air pollution on urban ecosystems and agriculture. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 18(3), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2011.570803
Bereitschaft, B., & Debbage, K. (2013). Urban form, air pollution, and CO2 emissions in large US metropolitan The Professional Geographer, 65(4), 612–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2013.799991
Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
Chatman, D. (2006). Transit-oriented development and household travel: A study of California Los Angeles: Institute of Transportation Studies, School of Public Affairs, University of California, Los Angeles.
Chen, X., Shao, S., Tian, Z., Xie, Z., & Yin, P. (2017). Impacts of air pollution and its spatial spillover effect on public health based on China's big data sample. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 915-925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.119
Cionco, R. M., & Ellefsen, R. (1998). High resolution urban morphology data for urban wind flow modeling. Atmospheric Environment, 32(1), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00274-4
Cömert, N. Z., & Hoskara, S. Ö. (2013). A typo-morphological study: The CMC industrial mass housing district, Lefke, Northern Cyprus. Open House International, 38(2), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-02-2013-B0003
Edussuriya, P., Chan, A., & Ye, A. (2011). Urban morphology and air quality in dense residential environments in Hong Kong. Part I: District-level analysis. Atmospheric Environment, 45(27), 4789-4803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.061
Ewing, R., & Handy, S. (2009). Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Urban Design, 14(1), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800802451155
Fan, C., Tian, L., Zhou, L., Hou, D., Song, Y., Qiao, X., & Li, J. (2018). Examining the impacts of urban form on air pollutant emissions: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 212, 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.001
Fattahi, M., Hesari, A., Sadeghi, H., & Asgharpour, H. (2015). Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Air Pollution and Public Health Expenditures: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach. Faslname-ye Model Sazi-ye Eghtesadi, 9(31), 43–60. [in Persian]
Frank, L. D., Greenwald, M. J., Winkelman, S., Chapman, J., & Kavage, S. (2010). Carbonless footprints: Promoting health and climate stabilization through active transportation. Preventive Medicine, 50, S99–S105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.09.025
Frank, L. D., Saelens, B. E., Powell, K. E., & Chapman, J. E. (2007). Stepping towards causation: Do built environments or neighborhood and travel preferences explain physical activity, driving, and obesity? Social Science & Medicine, 65(9), 1898–1914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.053
Frank, L. D., Stone, B., Jr., & Bachman, W. (2000). Linking land use with household vehicle emissions in the central Puget Sound: Methodological framework and findings. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 5(3), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00032-2
Ghadami, M., & Abdollahvand, H. (2018). Investigating the impact of urban spatial structure scenarios on air pollution (Case study: Tehran). Geography and Urban Spatial Development, 5(1), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.22067/gusd.v5i1.73356 [in Persian]
Givoni, B. (1998). Climate considerations in building and urban design. John Wiley & Sons.
Handy, S. L., Boarnet, M. G., Ewing, R., & Killingsworth, R. E. (2002). How the built environment affects physical activity: Views from urban planning. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0
Hankey, S., Lindsey, G., & Marshall, J. D. (2017). Population-level exposure to particulate air pollution during active travel: Planning for low-exposure, health-promoting cities. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(4), 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP442
Health Effects Institute. (2018). State of Global Air 2018: Over 7 billion people face unsafe air (Special report, pp. 1–2). Health Effects Institute.
Hough, M. (1995). Cities and natural processes. Routledge.
Kahrari, K., Shahrivar, S., Keykhosravi, A., & Seyed Jalil, (2025). Investigating the Effects of Urban Form and Meteorological Elements on Air Pollution in Tehran and Tabriz. Journal of Geography and Development, 23(79), 103–132. [in Persian]
Khaleghi Moghadam, N., Nazari, M., & Haghdoost, A. (2016). Environmental Pollutants (Case Study: Air Pollution and Its Harmful Effects). Proceedings of the 10th Pishgaman-e Pishraf Conference, Tehran. [in Persian]
Kirby, T. (2016). WHO: 92% of the world's population breathe polluted air. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 4(11), 862.
Lee, Y., Washington, S., & Frank, L. D. (2009). Examination of relationships between urban form, household activities, and time allocation in the Atlanta Metropolitan Region. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(4), 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.11.013
Li, C., Wang, Z., Li, B., Peng, Z. R., & Fu, Q. (2019). Investigating the relationship between air pollution variation and urban form. Building and Environment, 147, 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.06.038
Liang, L., & Gong, P. (2020). Urban and air pollution: a multi-city study of long-term effects of urban landscape patterns on air quality trends. Scientific reports10(1), 18618.
Lim, C. C., Hayes, R. B., Ahn, J., Shao, Y., Silverman, D. T., Jones, R. R., … & Thurston, G. D. (2018). Association between long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and diabetes mortality in the US. Environmental Research, 165, 330–336.
Madanipour, A. (2000). Urban Space Design: A Perspective on Social–Spatial Processes (F. Mortazayi, Trans.). Tehran: Shirkate Pardazesh va Barname-rizi-ye Shahri. [in Persian]
Marquez, L. O., & Smith, N. C. (1999). A framework for linking urban form and air quality. Environmental Modelling & Software, 14(6), 541–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(99)00018-3
Martino, N., Girling, C., & Lu, Y. (2021). Urban form and livability: Socioeconomic and built environment indicators. Buildings & Cities, 2(1).
Riazi, H. (2012). Urban Form Characteristics and Air Pollution. 1st Conference on Air and Noise Pollution Management, Tehran, Iran. [in Persian]
Rodríguez, M. C., Dupont-Courtade, L., & Oueslati, W. (2016). Air pollution and urban structure linkages: Evidence from European cities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.190
Seigneur, C. (2019). Air pollution: Concepts, theory, and applications. Cambridge University Press.
She, Q., Peng, X., Xu, Q., Long, L., Wei, N., Liu, M., … & Xiang, W. (2017). Air quality and its response to satellite-derived urban form in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Ecological Indicators, 75, 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.045
Song, Y., & Knaap, G. J. (2004). Measuring urban form: Is Portland winning the war on sprawl? Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976371
Sovacool, B. K., & Brown, M. A. (2010). Twelve metropolitan carbon footprints: A preliminary comparative global assessment. Energy Policy, 38(9), 4856–4869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.001
Theurer, W. (1999). Typical building arrangements for urban air pollution modelling. Atmospheric Environment, 33(24–25), 4057–4066. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00147-8
Tsirigoti, D., & Bikas, D. (2017). A cross scale analysis of the relationship between energy efficiency and urban morphology in the Greek city context. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 38, 682–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.149
Tsirigoti, D., & Bikas, D. (2017). A cross scale analysis of the relationship between energy efficiency and urban morphology in the Greek city context. Procedia environmental sciences38, 682-687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.149
Williams, T. (2014). Archaeology: Reading the city through time. In Reconnecting the city: The historic urban landscape approach and the future of urban heritage (pp. 17–45). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118383940.ch1
Yang, J., Shi, B., Zheng, Y., Shi, Y., & Xia, G. (2020). Urban form and air pollution disperse: Key indexes and mitigation strategies. Sustainable Cities and Society, 57, 101955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101955
Zebardast, E., & Riazi, H. (2013). The analysis of the relationship between neighborhood walkability capability and air pollution: Case study of areas around air quality monitoring stations in Tehran. Motaleate Shahri (Urban Studies), 2(5), 35–46. (In Persian).
Zebardast, E., & Riazi, H. (2015). Built Environment Indicators and Their Effects on Air Pollution (Case Study: Surrounding Areas of Fourteen Air Quality Monitoring Stations in Tehran). Honarha-ye Ziba: Memari va Shahrsazi, 20(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2015.56371 [in Persian]
Zhang, A., Xia, C., & Li, W. (2022). Exploring the effects of 3D urban form on urban air quality: Evidence from fifteen megacities in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 78, 103649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103649