نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

چکیده

استرس شهری به‌عنوان یکی از شایع‌ترین اختلالات مرتبط با سلامت روان، بازتابی از ارتباط میان بستر شهری و تأثیر آن بر وضعیت روانی انسان است. در این راستا، ارتقای کیفیت فضاهای شهری با تأکید بر طراحی شهری درمانگر منجر به ارتقای سلامت روانی شهروندان می‌شود. ارزیابی میزان استرس ادراک‌شده در فضاهای شهری متأثر از محیط‌های صوتی و بصری و عوامل استرس‌زای شهری از جمله ویژگی‌های طبیعت، ترافیک، محصوریت، ازدحام و صداهای طبیعی یا انسان‌ساخت است. اگرچه تأثیر محیط‌های صوتی و بصری بر بسیاری از جنبه‌های سلامت روان شناخته شده و در پژوهش‌های پیشین مورد تأکید قرار گرفته، اما تأثیرات مستقل و تعاملی آن‌ها بر استرس شهروندان ناشناخته و نیازمند مطالعه است. از این رو، انجام مطالعاتی مطابق با شرایط شهر اصفهان و به‌منظور گسترش دانش روان‌شناسی شهری ضرورت دارد. پرسش اصلی پژوهش به این شرح است: تأثیر محیط‌های صوتی و بصری بر میزان استرس ادراک‌شده شهروندان در فضاهای شهری اصفهان چگونه است؟ مطالعه حاضر در قالب پژوهش آزمایشگاهی و با هدف ارزیابی تأثیرات درمانگر محیط‌های صوتی و بصری بر استرس شهروندان در فضاهای شهری اصفهان طراحی شده است. این پژوهش از طریق طراحی فاکتوریال دوطرفه (چهار محیط صوتی × پنج محیط بصری) انجام شده و شرکت‌کنندگان به‌طور تصادفی به یکی از ۲۰ محیط درمانی در یک آزمایشگاه واقعیت مجازی اختصاص داده شده‌اند. مجموعاً 100 نفر از دانشجویان دانشگاه هنر اصفهان پیش از قرار گرفتن در شرایط درمانی، آزمون استرس اجتماعی تریر را برای القای سطح متوسطی از استرس انجام داده‌اند. سپس سطح استرس خود را پیش و پس از مواجهه با یک درمان محیطی تصادفی، از طریق پرسشنامه استرس حالت_صفت اسپیلبرگر گزارش داده‌اند. نتایج نشان می‌دهد تأثیر محیط‌های صوتی بر کاهش استرس شهری 1.4 برابر بیشتر از تأثیر محیط‌های بصری است. همچنین محیط‌هایی با ویژگی‌های طبیعی، صرف‌نظر از این که صوتی با بصری باشند، نسبت به محیط‌هایی با ویژگی‌های مصنوعی، تأثیر بیشتری بر کاهش استرس‌ دارند. ترکیب صحنه‌ها و صداهای طبیعت نسبت به سایر محیط‌ها بیشترین تأثیر را بر استرس ادارک‌شده در فضای شهری می‌گذارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Assessment of the Impact of acoustic and visual Environments on the Stress Levels of Urban Residents (Case Study: Isfahan, Iran)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Roya Hatami varzaneh 1
  • Mahmoud Shokuhi Dolatabadi 2
  • Fatemeh Bahrami Gahruei 1

1 Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Highlights

The psychological quality of urban spaces and the mental health of urban residents are influenced by urban design grounded in multisensory perception.
Stress reduction and psychological restoration in urban environments result from the interaction and synergy of acoustic and visual stimuli.
The effect of acoustic environments on reducing urban stress is 1.4 times greater than that of visual environments.
Urban environments combining natural landscapes with nature sounds provide the highest restorative potential.

 
Introduction
Urban stress, one of the most prevalent mental health-related conditions, reflects the relationship between the urban environment and human psychological well-being. In this context, improving the quality of urban spaces through therapeutic urban design contributes to enhancing residents’ mental health. Perceived stress in urban environments is influenced by both acoustic and visual settings, as well as by environmental stressors such as natural features, traffic, enclosure, crowding, and natural or human-made sounds.
Although previous studies have highlighted the importance of acoustic and visual environments in promoting mental health, their independent and interactive effects on perceived urban stress remain insufficiently understood. Consequently, research tailored to the specific environmental and cultural context of Isfahan is necessary to advance knowledge in urban psychology. Accordingly, this study addresses the following research question:
How do acoustic and visual environments affect residents’ perceived stress levels in the urban spaces of Isfahan?
Theoretical Framework
According to Environmental Stress Theory, psychological stress results from the dynamic interaction between individuals and their surrounding urban environment. Through cognitive appraisal, individuals interpret environmental conditions as pleasant or unpleasant, compatible or incompatible with their preferences, needs, and coping abilities (Vaessen et al., 2016). Consequently, environmental perception and stress experience are shaped by both exposure to environmental stimuli and the psychological responses that follow such exposure (Crosswell & Lockwood, 2020).
Based on the physiological functions of human senses, approximately 80% of environmental information is perceived through vision, reflecting the dominance of spatial perception, while the remaining 20% is received through hearing, emphasizing temporal perception. Therefore, stress experienced in urban environments is influenced by the interaction between acoustic and visual stimuli.
Furthermore, citizens’ perceptions of stress and their responses to acoustic and visual environments may vary according to their lived experiences, lifestyles, and social, economic, environmental, and ecological contexts. Finally, perceived psychological stress can be assessed either through individuals’ subjective evaluations of negative emotions—such as pressure, fear, or discomfort—or through the physiological and psychological symptoms reported following exposure to stressors (Tryon et al., 2015).
Methodology
This study employed a laboratory-based experimental design to evaluate the therapeutic effects of acoustic and visual environments on residents’ perceived stress in urban spaces in Isfahan. A two-way factorial design (four acoustic environments × five visual environments) was adopted, with participants randomly assigned to one of 20 virtual reality environments.
Twenty videos were developed to simulate realistic urban experiences by combining images of selected urban locations in Isfahan—including Shahid Rajaei Park, Sepah Street, Imam Ali Underpass, and Shahid Keshvari Neighborhood—with three categories of sounds: nature sounds, crowd murmurs, and traffic noise. Nature sounds represented restorative experiences in green spaces, crowd sounds reflected everyday human activity, and traffic noise represented common urban stressors.
A total of 100 students from the Art University of Isfahan completed the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) to induce a moderate level of stress before exposure to the experimental environments. Participants reported their perceived stress levels before and after exposure using the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).
The independent effects of acoustic and visual environments, together with their interaction effects, were examined. In addition, the mean stress reduction associated with each of the 20 acoustic–visual combinations was calculated to rank the environments from the most to the least restorative, thereby identifying desirable and undesirable combinations for restorative urban design.
Results and Discussion
The findings reveal several major patterns regarding the effects of acoustic and visual environments on perceived urban stress in Isfahan.

The combination of natural landscapes and nature sounds, such as Shahid Rajaei Park accompanied by birdsong and flowing water, produced the greatest restorative effect.
Urban environments characterized by built landscapes, such as Sepah Street, the Imam Ali Underpass, and the Keshvari Neighborhood, and by artificial sounds, including traffic noise and crowd murmurs, demonstrated considerably lower restorative potential and, in some cases, increased perceived stress.
The adverse effects of traffic noise were not fully mitigated by the presence of natural visual environments.
The synergy between natural auditory and visual stimuli enhanced parasympathetic nervous system activity and reduced both physiological and psychological stress responses.
Urban spaces characterized by heavy traffic and crowd density generated the highest levels of perceived stress because they reduced the sense of control, disrupted environmental processing, and increased sympathetic nervous system activation.
Although enclosure had a smaller influence on stress than traffic and crowding, it increased psychological pressure in critical situations by restricting visual openness and creating a sense of confinement.

Conclusion
The findings indicate that the effect of acoustic environments on reducing urban stress is 1.4 times greater than that of visual environments. Moreover, environments with natural characteristics, whether auditory or visual, provide greater restorative benefits than environments dominated by artificial features. Among all environmental combinations, natural landscapes accompanied by nature sounds produced the greatest reduction in perceived stress.
These findings demonstrate that acoustic and visual environments influence perceived stress both independently and interactively. Their interaction plays a critical role in improving the psychological quality of urban spaces and shaping users’ restorative experiences. Consequently, paying attention to multisensory harmony in urban design can contribute significantly to promoting mental health and creating healthier, more restorative urban environments.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Mental Health
  • Urban Stress
  • Acoustic Environment
  • Visual Environment
References
Adli, M. (2011). Urban stress and mental health. In R. Burdett & M. Taylor (Eds.), Hong Kong: Cities, Health and Well‑Being (Conference Newspaper, Urban Age, Nov 2011). London: London School of Economics, LSE Cities.
Bakolis, I., Hammoud, R., Smythe, M., Gibbons, J., Davidson, N., Tognin, S., & Mechelli, A. (2018). Urban Mind: Using smartphone technologies to investigate the impact of nature on mental well-being in real time. BioScience, 68(2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix149
Bond, M. (2017). The hidden ways that architecture affects how you feel. Retrieved November 16, 2024, from https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20170605the-psychology-behind-your-citys-design
Boyce, W. T. (2016). Differential susceptibility of the developing brain to contextual adversity and stress. Neuropsychopharmacology, 41(1), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2015.294
Baum, A., Singer, J. E., & Baum, C. S. (1981). Stress and the environment. Journal of Social Issues, 37(1), 4–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1981.tb01056.x
Crosswell, A. D., & Lockwood, K. G. (2020). Best practices for stress measurement: How to measure psychological stress in health research. Health Psychology Open, 7(2), 2055102920933072. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055102920933072
Charles, E. P., & Sommer, R. (2012). Ecological psychology. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (2nd ed., pp. 7–12). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375000-6.00142-7
Carles, J. L., López Barrio, I., & de Lucio, J. V. (1999). Sound influence on landscape values. Landscape and Urban Planning, 43(4), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00112-1
Elrafie, N. S. S., Hassan, G. F., El Fayoumi, M. A., & Ismail, A. (2023). Investigating the perceived psychological stress in relevance to urban spaces’ different perceived personalities. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14(6), 102116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102116
Empson, L. A., Baumann, P. S., Söderström, O., Codeluppi, Z., Söderström, D., & Conus, P. (2020). Urbanicity: The need for new avenues to explore the link between urban living and psychosis. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 14(4), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12861
Elsamahy, E. M., & Abd El-Fattah, R. (2018). Designing non-stressed psychological public spaces. BAU Journal: Health & Well-Being, Special Edition, 121–132. https://doi.org/10.54729/2789-8288.1063
Epel, E. S., Crosswell, A. D., Mayer, S. E., Prather, A. A., Slavich, G. M., Puterman, E., & Mendes, W. B. (2018). More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 49(1), 146–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.03.001
Gong, Y., Palmer, S., Gallacher, J., Marsden, T., & Fone, D. (2016). A systematic review of the relationship between objective measurements of the urban environment and psychological distress. Environment International, 96, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.08.019
Gan, Y., Luo, T., Breitung, W., Kang, J., & Zhang, T. (2014). Multi-sensory landscape assessment: The contribution of acoustic perception to landscape evaluation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(1), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4898424
Gifford, R. (2002). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice (3rd ed.). Canada: Optimal Books.
Han, X., Wang, L., Seo, S. H., He, J., & Jung, T. (2022). Measuring Perceived Psychological Stress in Urban Built Environments Using Google Street View and Deep Learning. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 891736. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.891736
Harker, M. (2013). Psychological sweating: A systematic review focused on aetiology and cutaneous response. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology, 26(2), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1159/000346930
Heron, J., Whitaker, D., & McGraw, P. V. (2004). Sensory uncertainty governs the extent of audio-visual interaction. Vision Research, 44(25), 2875–2884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.001
Jiang, B., Xu, W., Ji, W., Kim, G., Pryor, M., & Sullivan, W. C. (2021). Impacts of nature and built acoustic-visual environments on human’s multidimensional mood states: A cross-continent experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 77, Article 101659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101659
Joye, Y., & van den Berg, A. E. (2019). Restorative Environments. In G. R. Fox (Ed.), Environmental Psychology: Second Edition (p. 66). UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Jobin, J., Wrosch, C., & Scheier, M. F. (2013). Associations between dispositional optimism and diurnal cortisol in a community sample: When stress is perceived as higher than normal. Health Psychology, 33(4), 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032736
Kang, E., Boger, C. A., Back, K.-J., & Madera, J. (2011). The impact of sensory environments on spagoers’ emotion and behavioral intention. In 16th Graduate Students Research Conference. Houston, TX: Conrad N. Hilton College of Hotel and Restaurant Management, University of Houston. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14394/30158
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
Litman, T. A. (2022). Urban Sanity: Understanding Urban Mental Health Impacts and How to Create Saner, Happier Cities. Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
Li, H., & Lau, S.-K. (2020). A review of audio-visual interaction on soundscape assessment in urban built environments. Applied Acoustics, 166, 107372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107372
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (2013). Stress: Appraisal and coping. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine (pp. 1913–1915). New York: Springer.
Moghani Rahimi, Kh., Behzadfar, M., & Jalilisadrabad, S.(2022). Investigating the Factors Affecting Urban Stress in World Literature. urban structure and function Studies, 9(32), 217-242. https://doi.org/10.22080/usfs.2022.23245.2240 [in Persian]
McAndrew, F. T. (2015). Environmental Psychology. India: Indo American Books.
Mezuk, B., Abdou, C. M., Hudson, D., Kershaw, K. N., Rafferty, J. A., Lee, H., & Jackson, J. S. (2013). “White Box” epidemiology and the social neuroscience of health behaviors: The environmental affordances model. Society and Mental Health, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/215686931348089
Miller, D. B., & Townsend, A. (2005). Urban hassles as chronic stressors and adolescent mental health: The urban hassles index. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention. https://doi.org/10.1093/brief-treatment/mhi004
Miller, K. M., & Phillips, M. H. (2005). Correlates of urban stress and mental health: The impact of social context on resilience. Journal of Social Distress and Homelessness, 14(1-2), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1179/105307805807066301
Meredith, M. A., & Stein, B. E. (1983). Interactions among converging sensory inputs in the superior colliculus. Science, 221(4608), 389–391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6867718
Pelgrims, I., Devleesschauwer, B., Guyot, M., Keune, H., Nawrot, T. S., Remmen, R., Saenen, N. D., Trabelsi, S., Thomas, I., & Aerts, R. (2021). Association between urban environment and mental health in Brussels, Belgium. BMC Public Health, 21, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10557-7
Park, S. H., Lee, P. J., Jung, T., & Swenson, A. (2020). Effects of the aural and visual experience on psycho-physiological recovery in urban and rural environments. Applied Acoustics, 169, 107486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107486
Phillips, A. C. W. W. (2013). Perceived stress. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine (pp. 1453–1454). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_479
Pheasant, R. J., Fisher, M. N., Watts, G. R., Whitaker, D. J., & Horoshenkov, K. V. (2010). The importance of auditory-visual interaction in the construction of ‘tranquil space’. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 501–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.005
Sadeghpoor, F., Ranjbar, E., Esmaeilinasab, M., & Seyed Valiloo, M. H. (2023). Streets and stress: A pilot study on how quality and design of streets impacts on urban stress. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867231200584
Soliman, S. E. S., & Elkhateeb, A. A. (2022). Comparing user's feelings in courtyard and durqa'a: A case study of Mamluk madrassa in Cairo. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(2), 101546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.101546
Srivastava, K. (2009). Urbanization and mental health. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 18(2), 75. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.64028
Sternberg, E. (2009). Healing Spaces; The Science of Place and Wellbeing. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.
Suchday, S., Kapur, S., Ewart, C. K., & Friedberg, J. P. (2006). Urban stress and health in developing countries: Development and validation of a neighborhood stress index for India. Behavioral Medicine, 32(3), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.3200/BMED.32.3.77-86
Schlebusch, L. (2004). The development of a stress symptom checklist. South African Journal of Psychology, 34(3), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630403400301
Schweitzer, M., Gilpin, L., & Frampton, S. (2004). Healing spaces: Elements of environmental design that make an impact on health. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 10(1), 71–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/1075553042245953
Tryon, M. S., Stanhope, K. L., Epel, E. S., Mason, A. E., Brown, R., Medici, V., Havel, P. J., & Laugero, K. D. (2015). Excessive sugar consumption may be a difficult habit to break: A view from the brain and body. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 100(6), 2239–2247. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-4353
Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13(5), 523–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581135001
Varsie, H., Hosseinekhah, H., & Hashemi Ana., K. (2022). An Analysis of the Theoretical Approach of Urban Psychology with an Emphasis on the Stressful City, Case Study: Yasuj City. Journal of Urban Ecology Researches, 13(2)(27), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.30473/grup.2022.34700.1950 [in Persian]
Vaessen, T., Van Nierop, M., Reininghaus, U., & Myin-Germeys, I. (2016). Stress assessment using experience sampling: Convergent validity and clinical relevance. In P. Fauquet-Alekhine (Eds.), Stress self-assessment & questionnaires: Choice, application, limits (pp. 21–35).
Velarde, M. D., Fry, G., & Tveit, M. (2007). Health effects of viewing landscapes: Landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.07.001
Wang, Z., Li, Y., An, J., Dong, W., Li, H., Ma, H., Wang, J., Wu, J., Jiang, T., & Wang, G. (2022). Effects of restorative environment and presence on anxiety and depression based on interactive virtual reality scenarios. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), Article 7878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137878
Wang, Y., & Wang, P. (2019). Perceived stress and psychological distress among Chinese physicians: The mediating role of coping style. Medicine, 98(23), e15950. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015950
Wietgrefe, C. (2017, December 29). Making Space for Psychology in the Design of Public Spaces. Retrieved November 16, 2024, from http://environmentalpsychology.com/2017/12/29/making-space-for-psychology-in-the-design-of-public-spaces/
Watts, G., Khan, A., & Pheasant, R. (2016). Influence of soundscape and interior design on anxiety and perceived tranquillity of patients in a healthcare setting. Applied Acoustics, 104, 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.11.007
Xu, W., Wang, H., Su, H., Sullivan, W. C., Lin, G., Pryor, M., & Jiang, B. (2024). Impacts of sights and sounds on anxiety relief in the high-density city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 241, Article 104927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104927
Xu, W., Zhao, J., Huang, Y., & Hu, B. (2018). Design intensities in relation to visual aesthetic preference. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 34, 305–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.06.016
Yin, J., Yuan, J., Arfaei, N., Catalano, P. J., Allen, J. G., & Spengler, J. D. (2020). Effects of biophilic indoor environment on stress and anxiety recovery: A between-subjects experiment in virtual reality. Environment International, 136, Article 105427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105427
Yang, T.-C., & Matthews, S. A. (2010). The role of social and built environments in predicting self-rated stress: A multilevel analysis in Philadelphia. Health & Place, 16(5), 803–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.04.005
Zhang, J., Yan, H., & Wang, D. (2023). Effects of acoustic environment types on stress relief in urban parks. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1082. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021082
Zhang, X., Zhou, S., Kwan, M.-P., Su, L., & Lu, J. (2020). Geographic ecological momentary assessment (GEMA) of environmental noise annoyance: The influence of activity context and the daily acoustic environment. International Journal of Health Geographics, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-020-00246-w
Zhou, T., Wu, Y., Meng, Q., & Kang, J. (2020). Influence of the acoustic environment in hospital wards on patient physiological and psychological indices. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1600. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01600
Zhao, J., Xu, W., & Ye, L. (2018). Effects of auditory-visual combinations on perceived restorative potential of urban green space. Applied Acoustics, 141, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.07.001