نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• ابراهیم اخلاصی ¹
• علی خانمحمدی ²
• علی خاکساری رفسنجانی ³

¹ دانشیار، گروه جامعه‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم‌اجتماعی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.

² دانشجوی دکتری جامعه‌شناسی فرهنگی، گروه جامعه‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم‌اجتماعی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.

³ استاد، گروه برنامه‌ریزی اجتماعی، دانشکده علوم‌اجتماعی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

تحلیل روند تثبیت گفتمان فنی‌مهندسی خودرو در ساختار کالبدی شهر تهران در بازه زمانی 1349  -1400، با تأکید بر «رؤیت­ پذیرسازی سازوکارهای استخدام زبان تخصصی»، «پرده ­برداری از اتکای گفتمان فنی‌مهندسی خودرو به نهادهای قدرت و تکنولوژی‌های نوین» و «استقرار گفتمان فنی‌مهندسی در هسته مرکزی سیاست‌گذاری شهر تهران» هدف مقاله را تشکیل می­ دهد. «طرح‌های جامع و تفصیلی شهر تهران»، «آیین‌نامه‌ها»، «قوانین پلاک‌گذاری»، «نشانه‌های شهری»، «آرشیوهای رسانه‌ای» و «اظهارات مندرج در مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌عمیق با شهروندان درگیر با موضوع در محلات منتخب شهر تهران» منابع داده ­ای پژوهش هستند. داده­ ها حسب ملاحظات موجود در نمونه­ گیری نظری، به­ وجهی هدفمند گردآوری و بر مبنای تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی ووداک و تبارشناسی فوکویی کاوش‌ شده‌اند. یافته ­های تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی ووداک، «معنای استعاری» و «نقش زبان در مشروعیت‌بخشی به سیاست‌های فنی‌مهندسی» را رؤیت­ پذیر ساخته‌اند. به ­علاوه، مفاهیم مندرج در زبان رسمی و اسناد فنی، ضمن صورت­ بندی هویت و نظم جدید شهری و به ­حاشیه ­بردن خوانش‌های زیستی، تاریخی و انسانی از شهر، گفتمان فنی­ مهندسی خودرو را بازتولید و تثبیت نموده‌اند. ارائه تصویر روشن از سیر تاریخی تحول مفاهیم کلیدی مرتبط با «مالکیت خودرو»، «نظم ترافیکی» و «حق عبور» در حکم رئوس محوری یافته ­های برآمده از تبارشناسی فوکویی هستند. نهایی‌ترین نتیجه‌گیری تفسیری مطالعه در قالب روایت تاریخی و مبتنی درهم­­ آمیزی آورده­ های تحلیل گفتمان ووداک، تبارشناسی فوکویی و مباحث نظری مقاله برساخت شده‌است. به­ موجب روایت برساخت­ شده، «خودرو»، «علائم راهنمایی­ و ­رانندگی»، «اسناد مالکیت» و «بزرگراه‌» طی برهم‌کنشی‌های متداخل در شبکه‌های قدرت شهری و ایفای نقش مؤثر در شکل‌دهی به ساختار فضایی و گفتمانی در بستر کالبدی تهرانِ مدرن، از یک‌سو، «الگوهای خاص حرکت»، «سرعت» ‌و «‌کنترل» را بدل به مناسبات هژمونیک نموده‌اند و از سوی دیگر، «فضاهای محله ­ای غیرماشین‌محور» و «حافظه محلی» را به‌مثابه غیریت­ های مطرودِ مناسبات شهری_خودرویی مدرن به حاشیه فروبرده‌اند. بدین ­سان، مجموع مناسبات برآمده از گفتمان فنی­ مهندسی خودرو، طی فروکاستن از زیست‌پذیری انسانی، تصویر تکنوکراتیک و بیگانه با تبار تاریخی از اکنونِ تهران را بر شهروندان آن کلان شهر پدیدار ساخته‌اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• انضباط
• سوژه
• جامعه‌شناسی ترجمه
• تحرک
• گفتمان فنی‌مهندسی خودرو

موضوعات

• جامعه شناسی شهری

عنوان مقاله [English]

The automobile-based present of Tehran’s neighborhoods (A critical exploration of the Techno-Engineering configuration of Urban Mobility (1970–2021))

نویسندگان [English]

• Ebrahim Ekhlasi ¹
• Ali Khanmohammadi ²
• Ali Khaksari Rafsanjani ³

¹ Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.

² Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.

³ Department of Regional Development Planning, Faculty of Social Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Highlights

The techno-engineering discourse of the automobile in Tehran (1970–2021) has been consolidated through specialized language and deep-seated reliance on institutional power and advanced technological systems.
By infiltrating the core of urban policy-making, this discourse has transformed mobility, speed, and traffic control into a dominant hegemony, systematically marginalizing non-car-centric urban spaces.
The gradual expulsion of local memory and human livability has produced a technocratic, alienated image of modern Tehran, profoundly distancing the city from its authentic humanness and historical socio-cultural lineage.

 
Introduction
The central focus of this research is a rigorous critical analysis of the consolidation of the automobile-based techno-engineering discourse within the physical and social urban fabric of Tehran over the period spanning 1970 to 2021. Although this dominant discourse presents itself superficially as neutral, objective, and purely functional technical knowledge, it functions in reality as a potent and pervasive mechanism of power. Through the systematic deployment of specialized terminology, complex signage systems, restrictive regulatory frameworks, and sophisticated surveillance technologies, this discourse has actively reconstructed urban reality, redefined spatial priorities, and systematically marginalized human-centered livability in favor of vehicular efficiency.
The study proceeds from the critical premise that automobiles, highways, traffic signs, signals, and vehicle ownership documents are far more than passive instruments of transit; they constitute active, material-semiotic “actants” deeply embedded within complex networks of urban power. These elements have elevated particular patterns of movement, stringent speed regimes, and rigid control mechanisms into hegemonic relations. In doing so, they have simultaneously expelled local neighborhood memory and non-car-centric communal spaces from the urban imaginary. The primary objective of this study is to render visible three interlocking processes: (1) the strategic deployment of specialized technical language to confer legitimacy upon techno-engineering policies; (2) the deep reliance of this discourse upon existing and emerging institutions of power and advanced monitoring technologies; and (3) the durable institutionalization of this discourse at the very core of Tehran’s urban planning and policy-making apparatus. The investigation ultimately demonstrates how this discourse has reduced the city from a lived space of social interaction and human habitation to an optimized network dedicated primarily to vehicular throughput, thereby generating a technocratic image of contemporary Tehran that appears profoundly alienated from its historical and cultural lineage.
Theoretical Framework
This research adopts a qualitative, historical, and documentary approach and intentionally refrains from the deductive application of predefined theories to ensure a more nuanced investigation. Instead, the theoretical section seeks theoretical saturation and the construction of a coherent, bottom-up conceptual scaffold. Five core concepts—“discourse,” “discipline,” “mobility,” “human–nonhuman actants,” and “sociology of translation”—display the closest conceptual alignment with the research problem, namely the configuration of urban space under the hegemony of the automobile techno-engineering discourse.
In the Foucauldian tradition, discourse operates as the intimate coupling of power and knowledge. It transforms space from a supposedly neutral, physical container into a calculable, governable object that systematically organizes citizens’ perceptions, behaviors, and possibilities for action. Discipline, meanwhile, produces “docile subjects” through meticulous spatial ordering, the encoding of movement trajectories, and strict boundary demarcation. The automobile techno-engineering discourse exemplifies such disciplinary machinery by narrowing semantic fields and privileging specific spatial priorities, thereby reconfiguring the urban environment into a field of controlled flows.
John Urry’s mobility paradigm further reconceptualizes space as a dynamic field constituted by multiple, intersecting flows—physical, informational, and symbolic—structured around principles of accessibility, connectivity, and velocity. Moreover, Actor-Network Theory (Latour) and the sociology of translation foreground the agency of nonhuman entities (objects, technologies, infrastructures). In this perspective, urban space emerges as the contingent outcome of interactive networks comprising both human and nonhuman actants. The stability of power relations is achieved through the successful “translation” of interests, meanings, and objectives across these heterogeneous elements. Integrating these perspectives allows for the analysis of urban space as simultaneously disciplinary, technical, and networked—a configuration that enables certain forms of high-speed action while structurally foreclosing many others.
Methodology
The study employs a robust qualitative, historical, and documentary design, combining Wodak’s critical discourse analysis (CDA) with Foucauldian genealogy. Data sources are heterogeneous, providing a comprehensive historical sweep: successive comprehensive and detailed master plans of Tehran (from 1967 onward), vehicle registration bylaws and legislation, formal ownership certificates, urban signage and traffic control devices, extensive media archives (including Kayhan, Hamshahri, and Ettela’at newspapers, and associated reports), and semi-structured in-depth interviews with long-term residents of neighborhoods adjacent to the Navvab Safavi and Imam Ali highways.
Sampling was purposive and theoretically driven, guided by each source’s capacity to illuminate contradictions, discursive articulations, and critical conceptual shifts. The analytical process proceeded in iterative stages: initial open and axial coding, followed by deeper interpretative synthesis within the dual theoretical lenses of discourse analysis and genealogy. Research trustworthiness and validity were secured through cross-coder verification, detailed audit trails of the analytical process, and transparent documentation of every stage of the interpretation.
Results and Discussion
Findings are presented through both synchronous and diachronic analyses. Critical discourse analysis reveals that, since the 1960s, the automobile techno-engineering discourse has legitimized vast urban interventions by mobilizing ostensibly neutral lexemes such as “safety,” “traffic fluidity,” “accessibility,” “capacity,” and “transport optimization.” Through pervasive spatial metaphors—such as “vital artery,” “access network,” and “urban body in need of calibration”—the city is reduced to an entity whose primary function is vehicular transit, thereby sidelining lived, historical, and humanistic understandings of the urban landscape. Recent decades have witnessed the closure of this disciplinary loop via digital surveillance infrastructures, including cameras, congestion charging, and online penalty systems, which effectively silence alternative, human-centric discourses.
Genealogical analysis traces four historical phases of this transformation:

1960s: The 1970 Comprehensive Plan initiated the dominance of the automobile by eradicating local alleys and imposing an arterial network logic.
1980s–1990s: New registration regulations instituted a legal/illegal binary, reducing citizens to surveilled, rule-abiding bodies.
2000s: The mandate for single-sheet titles and technical inspections finalized the formation of the “vehicular subject” under the law.
2010s–2020s: Digital monitoring combined with media amplification of the “traffic crisis” marginalized dissenting voices.

The synthesis of both approaches yields a unified narrative: automobiles, traffic signage, ownership documents, and highways function as active actants within urban power networks. These material-semiotic entities have institutionalized specific mobility, velocity, and control patterns as hegemonic, relegating non-car-centric neighborhood spaces and local collective memory to the status of “excluded alterity.” The cumulative result is diminished human livability and the crystallization of a technocratic Tehran detached from its historical roots—a city engineered predominantly for vehicles rather than for the everyday life of its inhabitants.
Conclusion
This investigation establishes that the automobile techno-engineering discourse in Tehran constitutes a formidable discursive-power formation that has radically reshaped spatial organization and lived urban experience through specialized language, surveillance technologies, heterogeneous actant networks, and prevailing ideologies. The findings highlight the urgent need for a critical reorientation in urban policy: one that transcends narrow technical rationality and incorporates concerns for spatial justice, collective memory, and genuine human livability. Future inquiries—whether comparative, ethnographic, or experiential—may further illuminate the overlooked facets of this ongoing transformative process and propose alternative models for a more human-centered Tehran.
Acknowledgment
The authors gratefully acknowledge the residents of neighborhoods adjacent to the Navvab Safavi and Imam Ali highways for their participation in the semi-structured interviews, which provided essential field data. Special thanks are extended to Mr. Matin Shiri for his valuable assistance in facilitating contact with the interviewees.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Discipline
• Subject
• Sociology of Translation
• Mobility
• Techno-engineering Discourse