نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکدۀ هنر و معماری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

2 دانش‌آموخته کارشناس ارشد، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

مناطق ساحلی به دلیل ارائه­ فضاها و فرصت­های متنوع از گذشته تاکنون با تقاضای بالای جمعیت رو­به­رو بوده که این موضوع با بروز معضلات و آشفتگی­های متعددی در ابعاد مختلف ساحل همراه بوده است. این معضلات در حوزه­های متعددی از جمله حوزه­های محیط­زیستی، کاربری اراضی، سیاسی و امنیتی، مقرراتی و حقوقی در نواحی ساحلی کشور و از جمله بندر انزلی دیده می­شود. در شهر بندرانزلی طبق اسناد توسعه شهری و گزارشات مطالعاتی دستگاه­های اجرایی، پهنه‌ ساحلی شهر در سال‌های گذشته دچار افول مشهودی شده؛ به گونه­ای که به نظر می­رسد موجبات بروز آسیب‌های محیط‌زیست، افول اقتصادی و مسائل اجتماعی متعددی را در قالب کاهش کیفیت محیط ایجاد کرده است. بنابراین می­توان گفت مسئله‌ پیشِ رو، شناسایی مؤلفه­های حاکم بر ظرفیت­های توسعه­ای در پهنه‌­ ساحلی بندرانزلی است که دچار زوال شده و مدیریت مداخلات می­تواند فرایندهای بهبود کیفیت را موجب شود. روش تحلیل داد­ه­ها بهره­گیری از مدل معادلات ساختاری (SEM)  است که با استفاده از نرم‌افزار SmartPlS 3 صورت گرفت. برای آزمون مدل، با استفاده از پرسشنامه­ و براساس آرای کاربران فضا (مصرف­کنندگان)، کیفیت محیطی در نواحی ساحلی متشکل از نُه شاخص برآورد و مورد سنجش قرار گرفت. ضریب استاندارد شده مسیر میان مصرف­کننده و کیفیت محیطی (86/0) بیانگر این مطلب است که الگوی آماری کاربران به میزان 86 درصد از تغییرات متغیر کیفیت محیطی را تبیین می­کند. کیفیت محیطی پهنه­های ساحلی با نُه شاخص سنجیده می­شود که از میان آنها، نفوذپذیری اولویت نخست در تحلیل کیفیت محیطی ساحلی دارد و سایر شاخص­های مطرح مانند انعطاف­پذیری، سازگاری، کارایی، بامعنابودن، تناسبات، تنوع، اجتماع‌پذیری و پایداری به ترتیب در اولویت­های دوم تا نهم قرار می­گیرند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identify and prioritize environmental quality indicators in coastal areas

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mojtaba Rafieian 1
  • golkou giahhchi 2

1 Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Art & Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Art & Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Highlights:

Prioritization of Environmental quality indicators were done by structural equation modelling (SEM) method.
Smart PLS software was used in order to analyzing data.
Environmental quality indicators of coastal areas were investigated based on users’ opinions.
Permeability is the most efficient factor in desirability of coastal areas.

Introduction
Human societies have always been interested in beaches and their surrounding areas. This can be attributed to the existence of two territories of land and water in these areas, which lead to the creation of competitive advantages in social, economic, physical, and other aspects. The considerable demand of the population for exploitation of coastal areas has caused systematic problems and disruptions in these areas. As explained by Iran’s Vice President for Strategic Planning and Supervision, these problems have a variety of dimensions, such as environmental, land use, political and security, and regulatory and legal aspects. Therefore, these areas require the adoption of an integrated planning and management approach. Hence, the comprehensive integrated coastal zone management plan has begun to link planning at the national, regional, and local levels since the early 90’s around the world and after less than a decade later in Iran (in the late 90’s).
Theoretical Framework
Since 1976, the concept of environmental quality has been examined in the field of urban studies (urban planning and design), which addresses all the aspects of urban environments and spaces (Rafieian et al., 2013). It has been discussed and developed by many theorists over the past few decades. In terms of content, the previous decade can be regarded as the period of maturity of this notion, but there are still a large number of challenges involved in the implementation and operation.

[N1] The need for a comprehensive, integrated approach to coastal areas at the micro and macro scales, as well as the multidimensional concept of environmental quality, has provided an opportunity to view coastal areas from the perspective of this notion, to identify its indicators, and to prioritize them. Based on a review of the literature on coastal areas and environmental quality, the authors found that coastal users can provide one of the most important links between them.

Fig. 1. Theoretical framework
Methodology
Most of the dimensions that affect citizen satisfaction are determined by the concept of environmental quality. This study sought to prioritize the components of environmental quality based on user opinions. According to the literature, national and international documents, and authors’ views, a questionnaire was made to collect different indicators of the nine components. Moreover, coastal areas have some aspects that have been identified by other studies. Fig. 1 shows the theoretical framework of this study, which involved different aspects of coastal areas and environmental quality.
The method of analysis used in this study is based on Structural Equation Model (SEM). The data were analyzed using the SmartPLS 3 software. For testing the model, data were collected from 160 questionnaires based on the Likert spectrum distributed in the coastal area of Bandar Anzali. According to the SmartPLS outputs, space users had an indirect impact on the nine indicators of environmental quality derived from the theoretical framework.
Results and Discussion
Desirable environmental quality zones have nine features, of which permeability is the most powerful. According to this model, changes in environmental quality affect those in the permeability of the coastal zone by up to 87%. In this study, permeability is defined through four indicators, including absence of space confusion, quality of bike paths and sidewalks, visibility of natural and significant sights, and walkability and cyclability. According to coastal users, therefore, these four features are the most significant in this type of area.
In addition to permeability, the flexibility variable is more influential than the others. In this research, flexibility was defined by four indicators: flexibility of outdoor spaces, services for individuals with disabilities, flexibility of buildings, and individuals’ unblocked access to spaces. If environmental quality is there in a coastal zone, therefore, the above four indicators are expected to be in desirable conditions.
According to earlier experts’ and researchers’ findings on the indicators of environmental quality and a comparison to the results of the present study, we found that the proportionality indicator has been neglected in the definitions of environmental quality, as well as efficiency. Moreover, the comparison demonstrated that the present study examined a larger number of indicators over Iran, and considered issues such as meaningfulness, proportionality, flexibility, and functional compatibility for the first time.
Conclusion
Coastal areas are one of the most important zones around the world as they have a variety of advantages. Since there are different aspects to be considered in regard to coastal areas, it requires a comprehensive approach to plan and manage this kind of area. Theoretically, environmental quality can be addressed given a range of indicators corresponding to different dimensions of coastal areas. This research considered coastal users as the link between environmental quality and coastal areas, using structural equation modeling to examine the theoretical model. According to the PLS outputs, the indicators of environmental quality in coastal areas are prioritized as follows: permeability, flexibility, functional compatibility, efficiency, meaningfulness, proportionality, variety, presence of different groups of individuals, and sustainability. Thus, permeability is the most significant factor affecting the desirability of this kind of space.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Urban coast
  • environmental quality
  • Structural Equation Modeling
  • Coastal user
  • Bandar Anzali
Adams, M. (2013). Quality of urban spaces and wellbeing.
Almasi, Z., & Shanehshazzadeh, A. (2008). Nezam-e payesh va arzyabi baraye modiriat-e yek parcheh-ye manategh-e saheli-e Iran [Monitoring System of Integrated Coastal Zone Management of Iran]. Paper presented at the Coastals, ports and marine structures.
Carmona, M. (2019). Place value: place quality and its impact on health, social, economic and environmental outcomes. Journal of Urban Design, 24(1), 1-48. doi:10.1080/13574809.2018.1472523
Carter, H. N., Schmidt, S. W., & Hirons, A. C. (2015). An international assessment of mangrove management: incorporation in integrated coastal zone management. Diversity, 7(2), 74-104.
Davari, A., & Rezazadeh, A. (2017). Modelsazi-e moadelat-e sakhtari ba narmafzar-e PLS [Structural equation modeling with PLS]. Tehran: Jahad-e daneshgahi.
Firuzjah Shokri, P., Ahmadi, H., & Mahdavi, M. K., A. . (2017). Sanajesh-e mizan-e rezayatmandi-ye sokunati-ye shahrvandan az keyfiat-e mohit dar mahaleh-ha-ye shahri (motale’e-ye moredi: mahalat-e shahr-e Babolsar) [Measuring the level of citizens' residential satisfaction with the quality of the environment in urban neighborhoods (Case study: Babolsar neighborhoods)]. Motale’at-e Sakhtar va Karkard-e Shahri, 14, 31-52.
Garau, C., & Pavan, V. M. (2018). Evaluating Urban Quality: Indicators and Assessment Tools for Smart Sustainable Cities. Sustainability, 10(3), 575.
Ghashghayi, R., Movahed, K., & Mohamadzadeh, H. (2016). Arzyabi-ye hes-e ta’alogh be makan ba takid bar avamel-e kalbadi va mohiti dar savahel-e shahri (motale’e-ye moredi: savahel-e Bushehr) [Evaluation of sense of place with an emphasis on physical and environmental factors in urban coastal areas (Case study: Boushehr Town)]. Pajuhesh-ha-ye Joghrafiya-ye Barnamerizi-ye Shahri, 2, 161-282.
Hajinejad, A., Rafieian, M., & Zamani, H. (2011). Barresi va rotbeh bandi-ye avamel-e moaser bar rezayatmandi-ye shahrvandan az keyfiyat-e zendegi ( motale'e-ye moredi: moghayese-ye baft-e ghadim va jadid-e shahr-e shiraz)
[Assessment and Ranking of the Effective Factores on level of Citizen Satisfaction with Environmental Quality of Life(Case Study: Old and New Urban Pattern of Shiraz City)]. Pazhuhesh-haye Joghrafiya-ye Ensani, 43(77), -.
Hataminejad, H., Hamidi, A., & Mohamadi Kazemabadi, L. (2018). Sanjesh-e mizan-e rezayatmandi-ye sakenan az keyfiat-e mohit-e shahri dar baft-ha-ye farsudeh pas az farayand-e nosazi (motaleat-ye moredi: mahalate asadi va safa- mantaghe-ye 31 Tehran) [Evaluation of residents' satisfaction with the quality of the urban environment in the Deteriorated after Renewal process (Case study: Shahid Asadi and Safa neighborhoods in Region 13 of Tehran)]. Pajuhesh haye mohite Zamin, 31, 15-27.
Hataminejad, H., Manuchehri Miandoabi, A., Baharlu, I., Ebrahimpur, A., & Hataminejad, H. (2012). Shahr va edalat-e ejtemaei: tahlili bar nabarabari-ha-ye mahaleh-ei (motaleat-e moredi: mahale-ha-ye ghadimi-ye shahr-e Miandoab) [City and Social Justice: Analytic Inequalities of Neighborhood (The Case Study: The Old Neighborhoods Miondoab City)]. Pajuhesh-ha-ye Joghrafia-ye Ensani, 8, 41-63.
Kay, R., & Alder, J. (1998). Coastal planning and management: CRC Press.
Kesalkheh, S., & Dadashpoor, H. (2013). Assessment Residential Environmental Quality of Traditional and New Neighborhoods, in a Rapid Grown City, Tehran. Paper presented at the 48th ISOCARP Congress.
Kriken, J. L., Enquist, P., & R., R. (2015). Shahrsazi, noh asl baraye barnamerizi baraye gharn-e bist-o yekom [Urban planning, not the principle of planning for the 21st century] (N. Azimi & A. Asgari, Trans.). Rasht: Guilan University.
Latifi, A., & Sajadzade, H. (2014). Arzyabi-ye tasir-e mo’alefe-ha-ye keyfiat-e mohiti bar olgu-ha-ye raftari dar park-ha-ye shahri [The evaluation of environmental quality factors on the Behavioral patterns in urban parks- Case study: Mardom park of Hamadan City]. Motaleat-e Shahri, 11, 5-20.
Lins-de-Barros, F. M. (2017). Integrated coastal vulnerability assessment: A methodology for coastal cities management integrating socioeconomic, physical and environmental dimensions - Case study of Região dos Lagos, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Ocean & Coastal Management, 149, 1-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.09.007
Lotfi, S., Manuchehri Miandoab, A., & Ahar, H. (2012). Shahr va edalat-e ejtemaei: tahlili bar nabarabari-ha-ye mahale-yi (mored-e motale’e: mahalat-e Maragheh) [City and Social Justice: Analytic Inequalities of Neighborhood (The Case Study: The Old Neighborhoods Miondoab City)]. Pajuhesh-ha-ye Joghrafiye-ye Ensani, 2, 41-63.
Morales, G. G., Arreola-Lizárraga, J. A., & Grano, P. R. (2018). Integrated Assessment of Recreational Quality and Carrying Capacity of an Urban Beach. Coastal Management, 46(4), 316-333. doi:10.1080/08920753.2018.1474070
Naghsh-e-Jahan-Pars, O. C. (2013). Tarh-e tose’e va omran (jameh) shahr-e Anzali [Development plan (comprehensive) of Anzali city]. Retrieved from Tehran:
Ovsiannikova, T. Y., & Nikolaenko, M. N. (2015). Quality assessment of urban environment. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 71, 012051. doi:10.1088/1757-899x/71/1/012051
Poll, H. F. P. M. V. (1997). he perceived quality of the urban residential environment: a multi-attribute evaluation. (Doctor of Philosophy), University of Groningen,
Ports & Maritime, O. (2014). Tarh-e yekparcheye modiriat-e manategh-e saheli-ye Iran [Integrated Coastal Zones Management of Iran]. Tehran.
Rafieian, M., Asgharizadeh, Z., & Farzad, M. (2009). Matlubiat sanj-ye mohit-ha-ye shahri (roykard-ya, shakhes-ha, ravesh-ha) [Urban environments desirability (approaches, indicators, methods)]. Tehran: Shahr.
Rafieian, M., & Khodayi, Z. (2009). Barresi-ye shakhes-ha va meyar-ha-ye moaser bar rezayatmandi-ye shahrvandan az faza-ha-ye omumi-ye shahri [Investigating the indicators and criteria affecting citizens' satisfaction with urban public spaces]. Faslnameh-ye Rahbord, 53, 227-248.
Rafieian, M., Taghvaea, A., khademi, M., & Alipur, R. (2012). Barresi-ye tatbighi-ye ruykard-ha-ye sanjesh-e keyfiat dar tarahi-ye faza-ha-ye omumi-ye shahri [A comparative study of quality assessment approaches in the design of urban public spaces]. Anjoman-e Elmi-ye Mehmari va Sharsazi-ye Iran, 4, 35-43.
Samavati, S., & Ranjbar, E. (2018). Bazshenasi-ye avamel-e moaser bar shadi dar faza-ha-ye omumi-ye shahri. Motale’e-ye moredi: mahdudeh-ye piyadeh rah-e markaz-e tarikhi-ye Tehran [Identifying factors affecting happiness in urban public space (Case Study: Pedestrian Zone of Historic Part of Tehran)]. Motale’at-e Shari, 29, 3-18.
Shi’e, E., & Alipur Eshliki, S. (2010). Tahlil-e avamel-e keyfiat bakhsh-e mohit-e gardeshgari-ye saheli ba tavajoh be meyar-ha-ye gardeshgari-ye paydar, motale’e-ye moredi: savahel-e shahr-e Ramsar [Investigates the Contributory Factors of Coastal Tourism Improvement with Regard to Sustainable Tourism Criteria; Case Study: Ramsar Coast]. Armanshahr, 5, 155-167.
Silva-Cavalcanti, J. S., Costa, M. F., & Pereira, P. S. (2018). Rip currents signaling and users behaviour at an overcrowded urban beach. Ocean & Coastal Management, 155, 90-97.
Tabibiyan, M., & Mansuri, Y. (2014).). Ertegha-ye keyfiat-e mohiti va rezayatmandi az zendegi dar mahalat-e jaded-e ba olaviatbandi-e eghdamat bar asas nazar-ha-ye sakenan (nemune-ye moredi: Kashan) [Improving environmental quality and life satisfaction in new neighborhoods by prioritizing actions based on residents' opinions (Case study: Kashan)]. Mohitshenasi, 4, 1-14.
Taghvaee, A. A., Maroufi, S., & Pahlavan, S. (2013). Arzyabi-ye tasirat-e mohit-e shahri bar ravabe-t ejtemaei-ye shahrvandan morede-e motale'e: mahaleh-ye Abkuh-e shahr-e Mashhad [Evaluation of the Effects of Environmental Quality on Residents’ Social Relations:Aab-Kooh Sector in Mashhad City]. Naqshejahan- Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning, 3(1), 43-54.
Van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., & De Hollander, A. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being: Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study. Landscape and urban planning, 65(1-2), 5-18.
Vice President, S. P. a. O. (2010). Rahnama-ye motale’at-e taein-e Harim-e savahel-e darya-ha, daryacheh-ha, talab-ha va khor-ha [Guide to the study of the boundaries of seas, lakes, lagoons and estuaries]. Tehran.
Yavuz, A., & Kuloğlu, N. (2014). Permeability as an indicator of environmental quality: Physical, functional, perceptual components of the environment. World Journal of Environmental Research, 4(2).
Yıldıza, R., Şenlierb, N., & Güzelc, R. A.-B. İ. (2015). Sustainable urban design guidelines for waterfront developments. Paper presented at the 2nd International Sustainable Buildings Symposium.