نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار معماری، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه یاسوج، یاسوج، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه معماری، دانشکده هنر و معماری، واحد شیراز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شیراز، ایران

چکیده

بی‌توجهی طراحان و معماران به کیفیت مجموعه‌های زیستی در جریان رشد شتابان شهرنشینی، ساکنان این مجموعه‌ها را با مشکلات متعددی روبه رو نموده که از جمله مهمترین آنها، افت شدید کیفیت زندگی در این مجموعه­هاست. اهمیت این موضوع به حدی است که در بعضی موارد، زندگی در این مجتمع­ها، سلامت ساکنان آن را به مخاطره می­اندازد. در همین ارتباط پژوهش حاضر، کیفیت معماری را به عنوان متغیر مستقل، کیفیت زندگی را به عنوان متغیر وابسته و کیفیت سلامت را به عنوان متغیر میانجی مد نظر قرار داده و سعی در تحلیل چگونگی ارتباط میان متغیرهای یادشده نموده است. بنابراین بر اساس ادبیات تحقیق، کیفیت سلامت با سه شاخص سلامت جسمانی، سلامت روانی و سلامت اجتماعی مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. کیفیت معماری نیز در قالب سه شاخص کیفیت محیطی، کیفیت ساختاری و کیفیت عملکردی مد نظر قرار گرفت و در نهایت کیفیت زندگی خود به عنوان یک مفهوم ثابت و چند جانبه تعریف گردید. گردآوری اطلاعات در حوزه کیفیت معماری و سلامت با استفاده از پرسشنامه محقق ساز و در ارتباط با کیفیت زندگی با استفاده از پرسشنامه استاندارد انجام گرفت. جامعه آماری در این تحقیق، ساکنان سه مجتمع اساتید، دراک و چوگان در شهر شیراز بودند که از نظر بافت اجتماعی ساکنان و نیز موقعیت جغرافیایی در شهر، در یک سطح قرار داشته ولی از نظر شاخص­های محیطی و معماری، دارای تفاوت­هایی با یکدیگر بودند. تحقیق از نوع کمی _ کیفی و تجزیه و تحلیل داده­ها با استفاده از آزمون­های آماری و نیز تحلیل محتوای مصاحبه­های صورت گرفته از ساکنان انجام گرفته است. در انتها نتایج تحقیق حاکی از آن بود که کیفیات معماری، تأثیر بسزایی در کیفیت زندگی ساکنان در مجتمع­های مسکونی دارد که این موضوع از طریق ارتقای سطوح مختلف سلامت ساکنان شکل می­گیرد. به این ترتیب که کیفیت محیطی باعث ارتقای سلامت جسمانی شده، کیفیت ساختاری باعث ارتقای سلامت روانی شده و کیفیت عملکردی باعث ارتقای سلامت اجتماعی ساکنان می­شود و در نهایت برآیند این موارد باعث ارتقای کیفیت زندگی در مجتمع­های مسکونی می­شود.  

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating the role of architectural quality in improving the quality of life in residential complexes from the perspective of residents' health

نویسندگان [English]

  • aliakbar heidari 1
  • malihe taghipour 2

1 Department of Technical and Engineering, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran.

2 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art & Architecture, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Highlights
- The physical health of people in residential complexes is directly related to the environmental quality of those complexes;
- The mental health of the residents in the residential complexes is directly related to the structural quality of the complexes;
- The social health of the residents in the residential complexes is directly related to the functional quality of the complexes;
- Providing health dimensions in residential complexes is directly related to the quality of life of residents.
 
Introduction
Due to the inattention of designers and architectures to the quality of biological collections during the rapid growth of urbanization, the residents of these collections have faced many problems, the most important being the sharp decline in their quality of life. On the other hand, since home is the most important space in human life, and people spend most of their lives in residential environments, the quality of housing and its role in improvement of the quality of life is a significant issue. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate how the environmental quality of housing is related to the residents’ quality of life to analyze the mechanism of this relationship. Accordingly, the environmental quality of housing was considered as an independent variable and the quality of life as a dependent variable. In addition, given that the quality of housing is an objective issue, and the quality of life is a subjective issue, a mediating variable was needed with both objective and subjective aspects for analysis of the relationship between the two concepts. Therefore, the notion of health was considered as the mediating variable in this study, and an attempt was made to explain the relationship between the main variables through examination of the relationship between health and the dimensions of environmental quality, on the one hand, and its relationship with the quality of life, on the other.
Theoretical Framework
Based on the objectives and hypotheses of the research, architectural quality was considered as an independent variable, quality of life as a dependent variable, and health dimensions as a mediating variable. According to the research literature, the quality of architecture was evaluated in the form of three indicators: environmental quality, structural quality, and functional quality. The quality of life was evaluated in the form of a psychological-semantic concept including satisfaction with residents’ various aspects of individual and social life. Finally, the dimensions of health were analyzed in the form of three aspects: physical, mental, and social health.
Methodology
After a review of the literature and extraction of the indicators concerning each of the research variables, the theoretical framework of the research was presented. These indicators were examined as a case study using tools including observation, interview, and researcher-made questionnaires at three residential complexes in the city of Shiraz, Iran. A standard questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. The quality of architecture was assessed using the above tools based on the indicators provided for that purpose. Finally, the residents’ health conditions were assessed using a researcher-made closed questionnaire. To specify the validity and reliability of the questionnaires, the items concerning each variable were first designed and provided to the experts. After a number of the items were corrected and deleted, the final questionnaire was designed in the form of a set of 26 items, and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for each group was obtained.
Results and Discussion
The eventual research results follow.
- The physical health of the people in the residential complexes was directly related to the environmental quality of the complexes.
- The mental health of the residents of the residential complexes was directly related to the structural quality of the complexes.
- The social health of the residents of the residential complexes was directly related to the functional quality of the complexes.
- Provision of health dimensions in the residential complexes was directly related to the residents’ quality of life.
 Conclusion
1- The quality of architecture in residential spaces is directly related to improvement of the residents’ health conditions. In this regard, the following are significant:
-Improvement of the level of environmental quality promotes all aspects of health in housing, especially the residents’ physical health. This means that the most important factors ensuring the residents’ physical health include the provision of health, creation of environmental comfort in housing, and assurance of the residents’ safety, which lie in the field of environmental quality.
- Improvement of the level of structural quality in housing promotes mental health. Psychological peace is provided in the house through attention to the structural features of housing with respect to the method of spatial configuration, proper spatial zoning, provision of the residents with psychological security, creation of an appropriate visual space in the home environment, and the like. As a result, the residents’ mental health is improved at home.
- Improvement of the level of functional quality improves the residents’ social health in residential environments. We can refer to the capabilities of housing in provision of individual and social functions in the housing environment. are These capabilities include the establishment of collective spaces in the residential environment, creation of a space with functional diversity to perform a variety of activities in public spaces, generation of a spatial hierarchy, and individual and social privacy in space. Such solutions raise the possibility of increasing the interaction between neighbors, which leads to greater recognition among them, formation of the residents’ collective identity, and increase in the desire for social participation among them, which can ultimately contribute to social health.
2- The residents’ quality of health in residential complexes is directly related to the improvement of their quality of life.
This means that provision of all the three dimensions of health in residential environments increases the residents’ quality of life from all aspects. Therefore, if any of the dimensions of health is not provided in a residential environment, it can reduce the residents’ quality of life.
3- The quality of architecture in a residential space is directly related to the residents’ quality of life.
This issue, which is one of the main purposes of the present study, is quite obvious and understandable in light of the above. Thus, on the one hand, there is a two-way relationship between the quality of architecture and health dimensions; on the other hand, the residents’ quality of health in a residential complex is directly related to their quality of life there. Therefore, it can be stated that there is a direct relationship between the quality of architecture in a residential complex and the residents’ quality of life. Hence, improvement of the quality of architecture in a residential space increases different dimensions of the residents’ health, leading to an improvement in their quality of life.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Architectural quality
  • Quality of life
  • Health dimensions
  • Residential complex
  • Shiraz
Amérigo, M. a., & Aragones, J. I. (1997). A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction. Journal of environmental psychology, 17(1), 47-57.
Asefi M, I. E. (2016). Redefining Design Patterns of Islamic Desirable Contemporary Housing through Qualitative Evaluation of Traditional Homes. Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture, 4(2), 56-73.
Baum, A. E., Singer, J. E., & Valins, S. E. (1978). Advances in environmental psychology: I. The urban environment. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Campbell, S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities?: Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 296-312.
Carp, F. M., Zawadski, R. T., & Shokrkon, H. (1976). Dimensions of urban environmental quality. Environment and behavior, 8(2), 239-264.
Cozens, P., Hillier, D., & Prescott, G. (2001). Crime and the design of residential property–exploring the theoretical background‐Part 1. Property management.
Devine, E. T. (1915). The normal life. Survey Associates, Incorporated.
Dijkstra, T. (2001). Architectonic Quality. Policy Note Prepared by the Government Architect, The Hague.
Galster, G. C., & Hesser, G. W. (1981). Residential satisfaction: Compositional and contextual correlates. Environment and behavior, 13(6), 735-758.
ghafari, A. B., Maryam. (2011). What is Healthy House? Journal of Housing and Rural Environment, 30(133).
Ghiaei, M. H. A., Sharareh; Shahabian, Pouyan. (2013). Evaluating the Degree of Relation of Residential Satisfaction with House, Neighbor Unit and Neighborhood Variables (Case Study: Farabi Physicians’ Residential Complex). Journal of Hoviatshahr, 7(15).
Golkar, k. (2001). Constituent components of urban design quality. Journal of Sofeeh(32).
Habib, F. Z., Hosein; Rahbarimanesh, Kaman. (2011). Relevance Between Acquiescence of Habitations and Impacts on Relationships (Case Study: Ekbatan and Behjatabad Tehran). Journal of Hoviatshahr, 5(8), 103-118.
Heidari, A. A. A., Elham; Karkhaneh, Masoomeh; Ahmadifard, Narges. (2013). Assessing the landscape role of collective spaces in urban quality, a case study: District 1 of Tehran. Armanshahr journal, 11, 323-335.
Hekmatian, P. (2012). The dimension of urban design health. Sofeh journal, 22(1).
Jelinkova, Z., & Picek, M. (1984). PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL-FACTORS DETERMINING POPULATION RESPONSES TO ENVIRONMENT.
Kawakami, N., Winkleby, M., Skog, L., Szulkin, R., & Sundquist, K. (2011). Differences in neighborhood accessibility to health-related resources: a nationwide comparison between deprived and affluent neighborhoods in Sweden. Health & place, 17(1), 132-139.
Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social psychology quarterly, 121-140.
Khaef, S., & Zebardast, E. (2016). Assessing quality of life dimensions in deteriorated inner areas: A case from Javadieh neighborhood in Tehran metropolis. Social indicators research, 127(2), 761-775.
Kinsey, J., & Lane, S. (1983). Race, housing attributes, and satisfaction with housing. Housing and society, 10(3), 98-116.
Lansing, J. B., & Marans, R. W. (1969). Evaluation of neighborhood quality. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(3), 195-199.
Miller, F. D., Tsemberis, S., Malia, G. P., & Grega, D. (1980). Neighborhood satisfaction among urban dwellers. Journal of Social Issues, 36(3), 101-117.
Moeini, M. E., Gholamreza. (2012). An Analytic Approach Towards the Quality of Contemporary Residential Environment. Hoviatshahr Journal, 6(10), 47-58.
Mohit, M. A., Ibrahim, M., & Rashid, Y. R. (2010). Assessment of residential satisfaction in newly designed public low-cost housing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Habitat international, 34(1), 18-27.
Montgomery, D. C. (2020). Introduction to statistical quality control. John Wiley & Sons.
Mugerauer, R. (1995). Interpreting environments: Tradition, deconstruction, hermeneutics. University of Texas Press.
Pakzad, J. (2002). The Quality of Space. Abadi journal, 2(2).
Rahimi, G. (2013). The World Health Organization (WHO). Journal of Army Medical School, 5(1), 53-56.
Rossi, A., Eisenman, P., Ghirardo, D. Y., & Ockman, J. (1982). The architecture of the city. MIT press Cambridge, MA.
Sameh, R. (2018). A Reflection on the Definition of Quality in Architecture. Journal of Architectural Thought, 2(3), 44-64.
Schuessler, K. F., & Fisher, G. A. (1985). Quality of life research and sociology. Annual review of sociology, 11(1), 129-149.
Shaw, M. (2004). Housing and public health. Annu. Rev. Public Health, 25, 397-418.
Soleymani, E. (2017). Investigating the relationship between mental health and quality of life with the mediating role of spiritual health in students. Journal of Culture in the Islamic University, 6(21), 565-584.
Thomson, H., & Petticrew, M. (2005). Is housing improvement a potential health improvement strategy. WHO Regional Office for Europe’s Health Evidence Network (HEN 2005).
Ülengin, B., Ülengin, F., & Güvenç, Ü. (2001). A multidimensional approach to urban quality of life: The case of Istanbul. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(2), 361-374.
van der Voordt, D. J. M., & van Wegen, H. B. R. (2007). Architecture in use. Routledge.
Varady, D. P. (1983). Determinants of residential mobility decisions the role of government services in relation to other factors. Journal of the American Planning Association, 49(2), 184-199.
Victorson, D., Cella, D., Wagner, L., Kramer, L., & Smith, M. L. (2007). Measuring quality of life in cancer survivors.
zarghami, E. (2016). A Comparative Study of Iranian-Islamic Housing Characteristics with Today's Apartment Housing. Naqshejahan- Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning journal, 6(2), 60-72.