نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه جامعه شناسی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.

2 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، گروه جامعه شناسی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.

10.22034/urbs.2024.139835.4976

چکیده

فرهنگ یکی از مهم­ترین مؤلفه­های حیات شهرها محسوب می­شود و سیاست­گذاری فرهنگی شهری می­تواند در نقش محرک و تسهیل‌گر سیاست­های توسعه شهری ظاهر شود. شهر تبریز به عنوان یکی از مهم­ترین کلانشهرهای ایران در طول تاریخ همواره از ابعاد مختلف مورد توجه قرار داشته و یکی از تأثیرگذارترین شهرها بر تحولات فرهنگی ایران محسوب می­شود. در این پژوهش سعی بر آن بوده است که سیاست­های فرهنگی شهر تبریز در چهار محور اصلی نامگذاری معابر عمومی، ساخت المان­ها و تندیس­ها، مواجهه با گذشته شهر و سیاست­های قومیتی، از چشم­انداز ساکنان آن مورد مطالعه قرار بگیرد. همچنین به این موضوع پرداخته شود که ساکنان شهر تبریز سیاست­های فرهنگی شهرشان را چگونه روایت می­کنند و چه درکی از آن دارند؟ این پژوهش از نوع کیفی و با روش تحلیل مضمون انجام گرفته است. جامعه آماری پژوهش، زنان و مردان تحصیلکرده بالای 25 سال هستند که بیش از 10 سال در شهر تبریز زندگی کرده و آگاهی کافی در رابطه با درک سیاست­­های فرهنگی را داشته باشند. نمونه شامل ۱۵ نفر (هشت نفر مرد و هفت نفر زن) بوده که به صورت هدفمند انتخاب شده و نحوه گردآوری داده­ها از طریق مصاحبه نیمه ساخت یافته بوده است. در بخش نظری این پژوهش، از نظریات لوفور و تولید فضا، بنیامین و خاطره، دوسرتو و مقاومت، میزتال و حافظه بهره برده­ایم. یافته­های این پژوهش در قالب هفت تم اصلی " رنج نسیان، ردپای خاطره، فروپاشی مکرر، سیاست حافظه، دیگرِی شهر، کانالیزه کردن فضا و کنشگری مقاومتی" بیان شده­اند. یافته­های این پژوهش حاکی از آن است که در سال­های اخیر با اعمال سیاست­های از بالا به پایین و گاه نامناسب، شهر تبریز از الگوی توسعه شهری تاریخی و پیشین خود فاصله گرفته و مسیری متفاوت در پیش گرفته است. همین امر ساکنان را با مقاومت نسبت به این سیاست­ها و با نوعی تعصب نسبت به شهرشان روبه­رو کرده است.  

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Studying citizens' narratives on the cultural policies in the city of Tabriz

نویسندگان [English]

  • somayeh shalchi 1
  • Maryam Allah dousti 2

1 Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.

2 .Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Highlights:
- Unilateral implementation of urban cultural policies is problematic.
- The process of renovation and reconstruction in Tabriz mirrors modern urban renewal.
- Identity is defined and redefined at the intersection of power and cultural shifts.
- Citizens call for democratic cultural policies that reflect their diverse needs and values.
Introduction:
Understanding the significance of culture in shaping the meaning of place is crucial in today's world, as cities have become the primary environments for human life. These urban spaces are deeply affected by rapid cultural changes, which influence not only their physical form but also the lives and identities of their residents. In this context, Tabriz, a historically rich city, serves as an ideal case for examining how cultural policies affect urban life. This research investigates the cultural policies of Tabriz through a sociological lens, focusing on the narratives and perspectives of its residents. The main objective is to explore how these policies are perceived by the people of Tabriz and to understand what role they play in shaping the identity, memory, and cultural landscape of the city.
Theoretical Framework:
The theoretical framework of this research draws on the works of several key thinkers, including Lefebvre, Crinson, Simmel, Berman, Miztal, Doserto, and Benjamin. According to Lefebvre, urban space is inherently political and never neutral, as it reflects power structures and social relations (Lefebvre, 2015: 21). Crinson suggests that cities are remembered through their buildings, which serve as tangible representations of urban memory (Crinson, 2016: 17). Miztal emphasizes that any objectified entity in a city can evoke perception and memory, providing a narrative about the past (Miztal, 2003: 132). Doserto adds that resistance plays a key role in urban spaces, as individuals create meaning in the city through their actions and interactions (Doserto, 1997).
Methodology:
This research uses thematic analysis to collect and interpret narratives from residents of Tabriz who are over 25 years old, have lived in the city for more than 10 years, and possess sufficient knowledge about its cultural policies. The participants, both men and women, shared their insights through in-depth interviews. The goal was to gather a diverse range of opinions and experiences, capturing the different ways in which Tabriz's residents understand and engage with the city's cultural policies.
Results and Discussion:
The thematic analysis yielded several key themes, which are summarized below:

The Suffering of Forgetfulness: Drawing on Crinson's theory of urban memory, this theme highlights how urban renewal projects in Tabriz disconnect the present city from its past. As the city's infrastructure is modernized, its historical identity is eroded, leading to a sense of loss among residents.
Traces of Memory: Benjamin views the city as a complex site of perception and memory (Benjamin, 1986: 26). In Tabriz, the fast pace of renovations has resulted in the destruction of many historically significant areas, leaving residents with a fragmented sense of their city's past.
Repeated Collapse: Berman argues that modernity is a shared experience of both creation and destruction (Berman, 2016: 15). Tabriz, like many cities undergoing rapid modernization, experiences this duality—while modern urban development brings economic opportunities, it also threatens the city's cultural and historical fabric.
Memory Policy: Miztal’s notion of memory policy refers to the way in which official narratives are imposed from above, shaping collective memory (Miztal, 2003: 129). In Tabriz, the dominant political and cultural discourses often reshape the city's memory, leaving little room for organic, grassroots narratives to emerge.
The Other of the City: Simmel's concept of the duality of self and other is crucial for understanding the subjectivity of urban dwellers. In Tabriz, the coexistence of traditional and modern elements creates a complex dynamic between residents' historical identity and their adaptation to modernity. This is reflected in the city's proximity to Turkey, which shares similar historical and cultural contexts.
Channelization of Space: Lefebvre posits that urban planners play a crucial role in controlling and producing space (Lefebvre, 2015: 37). In Tabriz, planners have been instrumental in transforming the city through modernization projects that prioritize infrastructure over the preservation of historical sites, contributing to the loss of cultural memory.
Resistance Activism: Doserto's theory of power and resistance in urban spaces (Doserto, 1997) is evident in the actions of Tabriz's citizens, who strive to preserve their ethnic, linguistic, and cultural diversity. Through various forms of activism, they resist the homogenization of their city's identity and seek to retain its unique character.

Conclusion:
Cultural sustainability, which encompasses the preservation and expansion of history, values, and relationships, is a key component of urban life. In Tabriz, the process of renovation and reconstruction has been marked by rapid changes and widespread destruction. The residents of Tabriz experience this as a loss of their city’s historical and cultural identity. For Tabriz to develop successful cultural policies, its urban plans must prioritize the needs and interests of its citizens over cars and infrastructure. Moreover, these policies should be democratic and inclusive, reflecting the diversity of the population. The narratives of Tabriz's residents offer valuable insights into their levels of satisfaction with the city's cultural policies and their willingness to engage in its governance. As urban renewal continues to reshape Tabriz, it is crucial to listen to these voices and incorporate them into future policy decisions to create a city that honors both its past and its future.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cultural policy
  • Tabriz city
  • modernization
  • memory
  • ethnic and linguistic diversity
-Acri, M., Dobričić, S., & Debevec, M. (2021). Regenerating the Historic Urban Landscape through Circular Bottom-Up Actions: The Urban Seeding Process in Rijeka, University of Nova Gorica, Graduate School, Cultural Heritage Studies; Glavni trg 8, SI-5271 Vipava, Slovenia, Sustainability 2021, 13(8), 4497; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084497.
-Bababei Morad, B., Hadafi, F., & Bababei Morad, M. (2021). Explaining the role of environmental quality and cross-cultural characteristics of a place in place satisfaction Case study: the coastal strip of Karun River,15(55),7-26, DOI: 10.30495/jss.2021.1940369.1379. [in Persian]
-Banderin, F. & Owers, R. (2015). Historic cityscape. (Translated by Poya Dolabi. et al). Tehran: Tehran University Press. [in Persian]
-Benjamin, W. (2015). The culture of storytellers and the culture of artisans, from the book of critical sociology. (Translated by H. Chavoshian). Tehran: Kitab Ame. [in Persian]
-Benjamin, W. (1986). A Berlin Chronicle, in P.Demetz (ed.) New York:  Schocken, pp. 3-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4449-9_3.
-Berman, M. (2007). The experience of modernity. (Translated by M. Farhadpour). Tehran: Design Review. [in Persian]
-Bianchini, F. (2013). The mental landscape of the city. (Translated by Kaveh Akbari and colleagues). Tehran: Tisa. [in Persian]
-Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic anahysis in psychohogy. Qualitive research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
-Crinson, M. (2017). Urban Memory: History and Forgetting in the Modern City. (Translated by R. Najafzadeh). Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications. [in Persian]
-De Certeau, M. (1997). Practice of Everyday Life, Translated by Steven Rendall, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.22067/pg.v2i6.63713.
-De Certeau, M. (1998). The Practice of Everyday Life, In John Storey (Ed.) Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: A Reader, London: Prentice Hall.
-De Certeau, Michel. (2018). Walking in the city, in the book of cultural studies, collection of articles. (Translated by N. Malek-Mohammadi and Sh. Vaqfipour). Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications. [in Persian]
-Fazeli, N. (2011). Culture and the city: cultural rotation in urban discourses based on Tehran city studies. Tehran: Tisa Publishing. [in Persian]
-Gelnits, Andrey. (2016). Production of space by Henri Lefebvre, from the introductory book on the production of space by Henri Lefebvre. (Translated by A. Turkmeh). Tehran: Tisa. [in Persian]
-Grodach, C., & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2007). CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES AND URBAN REVITALIZATION, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13:4, 349 – 370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630701683235.
-Habibi, M., & Maqsoodi, M. (2014). Urban renovation; Definitions, theories, experiences, international charters and resolutions, urban methods and actions. Tehran: University of Tehran. [in Persian]
-Hubbard, Ph. (2020). City (Translated by A. Khakbaz). Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications. [in Persian]
-Khamachi, B. (2006). My City of Tabriz. Tabriz: Nedai Shams. [in Persian]
-Lefebvre, H. (1971). Everyday life in the modern world. (Rabinovitch; S. Trans.), Harper & Row Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351318280.
-Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. (Nicholsonsmith; D. Trans.), Oxford, Blackwell publishers.
-Lefebvre, H. (2016). An introductory book on the production of space by Henri Lefebvre. (Translated by A. Turkmeh). Tehran: Tisa. [in Persian]
-Lefebvre, H. (2019). space, difference, everyday life; Reading Henri Lefebvre. (Translated by A. Khakbaz & M. Fazeli). Tehran: Tisa. [in Persian]
-Lotfi, S., Sholeh, M., & Ali Akbari, F. (2017). Compiling the Conceptual Framework of Culture-led Urban Regeneration Principles Application in Historic Urban Fabrics (Case Study: Shiraz, Iran). Architecture and Urban Planning of Iran (JIAU), https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2018.62059. [in Persian]
-Lu, S., Sheld, S., T, Dana. (2012). A new perspective on cultural diversity in public spaces. (Translated by A. Zoghi, N. Rashidpour, W. Moradi-Masihi). Tehran: Tehran Municipal Publications. [in Persian]
-Misztal, B. (2003). Durkheim on Collective Memory, SAGE Publications London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi Vol 3(2): 123–143es. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468795X030032002.
-Miztal, B. (2020). An introduction to the sociology of memory. (Translated by M. Rasouli). Tehran: Tisa. [in Persian]
-Mohabati, F. (2020). Renovation, city image and urban memory: a case study of the neighborhood of Kan. Master's thesis, Allameh Tabatabai University. [in Persian]
-Navarro, C. J., & Terry N. C. (2012). Cultural policy in european cities, An analysis from the cultural agenda of mayors. European Societies, 14, 636–659. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2012.726369.
-Pourahmad, A., Ali Akbari, I., Musa Kazemi, M, Rahmani, R. (2017). Developing a strategic plan for the development of Qazvin city with an emphasis on the role of cultural factors. Iranian Islamic City Studies, 9(33), 65-73. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/366022/fa. [in Persian]
-Rahimi, S. (2012). Investigating the role of institutions in charge of urban management in promoting the culture of citizenship under study: Fasa city. Master's thesis, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz. [in Persian]
-Saunders, P. (2014). Social theory and urban problem. (Translated by M. Sharâpour). Tehran: Tisa. [in Persian]
-Shalchi, S., Shojaei, M., and Farhani., H. (2015). Urban reconstruction, the image of Tehran and the experience of alienation. Iranian Cultural Research, 9(1 (series 33)), 1-32. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/137006/fa. [in Persian]
-Simmel, G. (1993). The metropolis and mental life. (Translated by Yusuf Abazari). Tehran: Journal of Social Sciences. Volume 3, Number 6. pp. 53-66. [in Persian]
-Stevenson, N. (2013). Cultural citizenship, global urban issues. (Translated by A. Khakbaz). Publications of the General Department of Social and Cultural Studies of Tehran Municipality. [in Persian]
-Tankis, F (2016). Space, city and social theory. (Translated by H. Parsi and A.Platoni). Tehran: Tehran University Press. [in Persian]