نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد برنامه‌ریزی شهری، گروه مهندسی شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه مهندسی شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران

چکیده

مشارکت زنان در فرآیند برنامه‌ریزی و مدیریت پارک‌های شهری در سال‌های اخیر به‌عنوان یکی از رویکردهای کلیدی برای ارتقای عدالت فضایی، افزایش کیفیت فضاهای عمومی و بهبود سطح زندگی شهری مطرح شده است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی و تحلیل موانع حضور زنان در پارک‌های شهری و ارائه راهکارهایی مشارکتی و مبتنی بر نیازهای واقعی آنان انجام گرفت. این مطالعه به روش ترکیبی (کمی_کیفی) و با تمرکز بر پارک شهدا در شهر سنندج انجام شد. جامعه آماری شامل تمامی زنان بالای ۲۰ سال بود و نمونه‌ای ۳۸۴ نفره به‌صورت تصادفی انتخاب گردید. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها شامل پرسشنامه، مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته، مشاهده میدانی و تحلیل مکانی بود و داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزارهای SPSS، MAXQDA و ArcGIS تحلیل شدند. یافته‌ها نشان‌داد که برخی شاخص‌های کالبدی همچون دسترسی، کیفیت پوشش گیاهی و وجود پارکینگ از وضعیت نسبتاً مطلوبی برخوردارند؛ در حالی که مؤلفه‌های مرتبط با امنیت، تنوع فعالیت‌ها، خدمات رفاهی، روشنایی، برنامه‌های فرهنگی و امکانات اجتماعی_اقتصادی در سطح نامطلوب قرار دارند. تحلیل کیفی نیز بیانگر آن بود که زنان بر ضرورت بهبود روشنایی، تقویت نظارت اجتماعی، گسترش خدمات رفاهی و طراحی فضاهای چندمنظوره تأکید دارند. نوآوری اصلی این پژوهش در تدوین شاخص تجربه‌محور عدالت جنسیتی (GEPI) نهفته است که با ترکیب نظام‌مند داده‌های کیفی و کمی، امکان سنجش همزمان زیرساخت‌های کالبدی و تجربه ادراکی_اجتماعی زنان را فراهم می‌کند. این شاخص در پنج بُعد کالبدی، اجتماعی، اقتصادی، فرهنگی و زیست‌محیطی طراحی شده و به‌عنوان ابزاری کاربردی برای برنامه‌ریزی فضاهای عمومی با هدف تسهیل حضور مؤثر و پایدار زنان قابل استفاده است. ادغام داده‌های کمی و کیفی و استفاده از تحلیل GIS، امکان ارائه راهکارهای عملیاتی چندسطحی را برای بهبود کیفیت پارک‌های شهری فراهم ساخت. یافته‌های این پژوهش می‌تواند الگویی برای برنامه‌ریزان شهری به منظور طراحی فضاهای عمومی پاسخگو به نیازهای جنسیتی در شهرهای ایران و منطقه باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying and analyzing women’s preferences and needs in urban park planning: Developing an experience-based gender equity index (Case Study: Shohada park, Sanandaj)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohanna Sarvari 1
  • Nina Khalighi 2
  • Mehdi Saidi 2

1 Department of Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.

2 Department of Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

چکیده [English]

Highlights

This research introduces the innovative Gender Equity Experience Index (GEPI), which uniquely evaluates both physical infrastructure and women’s perceived experiences to understand their presence in urban parks.
The findings reveal that improving park infrastructure alone is insufficient to achieve gender equity, as social, cultural, and economic factors play decisive roles.
A significant gap exists between the provision of physical lighting and women’s perceived sense of safety, primarily due to the lack of effective social surveillance mechanisms.
The study highlights the need for a multidimensional approach that integrates physical design with social, cultural, and economic planning to create inclusive and welcoming urban public spaces for women.

 
Introduction
International frameworks and theories, including Lefebvre’s theory of the production of space and the concept of the embodiment of space, emphasize that space is socially produced through human interactions. When urban planning fails to address women’s needs, their lived experience of space becomes constrained by insecurity, limited accessibility, and reduced opportunities for participation. In Iranian cities, the dominance of conventional planning approaches has resulted in public spaces that inadequately respond to women’s requirements for safety, accessibility, and comfort.
Previous studies have identified security, activity diversity, and individual characteristics—such as age and marital status—as key determinants of women’s presence in public spaces. Weak security, cultural constraints, and the lack of gender-responsive public services have further reduced women’s participation in urban spaces and intensified spatial inequality. Focusing on Shohada Park in Sanandaj, this study demonstrates that inadequate lighting, insufficient urban furniture, and limited public services have contributed to women’s lower presence despite their substantial share of the city’s population.
Theoretical Framework
This study develops a theoretical framework to examine the factors shaping women’s preferences in urban parks and to evaluate park planning quality from a gender-responsive perspective. The framework draws upon studies of urban parks, women-centered planning, public participation, and women’s use of public spaces.
It assumes that women’s experiences of urban parks are multidimensional and influenced by the interaction of physical, social, cultural, economic, and environmental factors. Accordingly, park quality is conceptualized as a multidimensional construct that reflects both objective physical conditions and women’s subjective experiences. The framework is operationalized through measurable indicators to support practical and gender-responsive urban park planning.

A theoretical framework for analyzing women’s preferences and evaluating park planning quality.
Grounded in the literature on urban parks, women-centered planning, public participation, and women’s use of public spaces.
Women’s experiences are shaped by physical, social, cultural, economic, and environmental dimensions.
Park quality incorporates both objective characteristics and subjective perceptions.
The framework is translated into measurable indicators for practical planning applications.

Methodology
This applied study adopts a mixed-methods (qualitative–quantitative) approach to develop and evaluate the Gender Equity Experience Index (GEPI) across five dimensions. Qualitative data were first used to identify the relevant indicators, which were subsequently tested and quantified through quantitative analysis.

Applied research using a mixed-methods approach.
Development and measurement of the Gender Equity Experience Index (GEPI) across five dimensions: physical, social, economic, cultural, and environmental.
Study population: women aged over 20 years in Sanandaj (population: 148,920; 2016 Census).
Shohada Park was selected as the case study because of its importance as a major urban public space.

Results and Discussion
The findings indicate that women’s presence in Shohada Park is influenced by the combined effects of physical, social, cultural, economic, and environmental factors rather than by physical conditions alone.
The principal innovation of this study is the development of the Gender Equity Experience Index (GEPI), which simultaneously evaluates objective park infrastructure and women’s subjective experiences. The results demonstrate that physical improvements alone cannot achieve gender equity in urban public spaces. Instead, social cohesion, cultural acceptance, economic opportunities, and environmental quality are equally important in shaping women’s experiences and encouraging their presence.
Conclusion
The findings demonstrate that increasing women’s presence in urban parks requires more than physical improvements. A multidimensional approach that simultaneously addresses social, cultural, economic, and environmental factors is essential for creating equitable and inclusive public spaces.
The study introduces the Gender Equity Experience Index (GEPI) as a practical, policy-oriented tool for evaluating public spaces from a gender equity perspective through the integration of qualitative and quantitative evidence.
The results also highlight several planning priorities, including improving restroom facilities, providing multipurpose public spaces, expanding cultural programs, strengthening affordable commercial services, enhancing children’s play facilities and urban furniture, and increasing both actual and perceived safety through improved lighting and social surveillance.
By incorporating economic and cultural dimensions within a mixed-methods framework, the study provides a more comprehensive understanding of women’s experiences in urban public spaces. Nevertheless, the research is limited by its focus on a single park and its cross-sectional design. Future studies should employ comparative and longitudinal approaches to validate and expand the proposed framework across different urban contexts.
Ultimately, achieving safe, inclusive, and gender-responsive urban spaces requires a fundamental reconsideration of conventional urban planning approaches.
Acknowledgment
This article is derived from a Master’s thesis in Urban Planning titled 'Planning Urban Parks Based on the Needs and Preferences of Women: A Case Study of Shohada Park, Sanandaj,' presented at the University of Kurdistan by the first author, supervised by the second author and consulted by the third author.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Shohada Park, Sanandaj
  • Urban Parks
  • Women’s Preferences
  • Gender Equity
  • Participatory Planning
  • Gender Equity Experience Index (GEPI)
Alizadeh, H., Bork-Hüffer, T., Kohlbacher, J., Mohammed-Amin, R. K., & Naimi, K. (2022). The contribution of urban public space to the social interactions and empowerment of women. Journal of Urban Affairs, 44(5), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2021.1957928
Apple, L. (2006). Gendered Spaces in Urban Planning. Journal of Urban Design, 11(2), 135–154.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Afrough, E. (2001). Space and inequality. Ney Publications.]in Persian[
Almasifar, N., & Ansari, M. (2010). Environmental security assessment in regional parks as part of urban spaces from women’s perspective based on the CPTED approach (Case study: Saei Park). Urban Management, 25(8), 21–34. ]in Persian[
Azimi, N., & Asfidani, M. R. (2012). Urban public spaces and women’s social interaction. Applied Sociology Journal, 23(4), 127–146. ]in Persian[
Rafieian, M., Khaksar, M., & Mehdizadeh, J. (2013). Analysis of the role of gender in the formation of urban spaces identity. Honarhay-e Ziba - Architecture and Urbanism, 18(1), 5–14. ]in Persian[
Bemanian, M., Ajzā Shokūhi, M., & Esmaeili, R. (1397). A comparative study of gendered city theories. Quarterly Journal of Urban Studies, 7(28), 3–18. ]in Persian[
Beebeejaun, Y. (2017). Gender, urban space, and the right to everyday life. Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(3), 323-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2016.1255526
Charkhchian, M., & Daneshpour, S. A. H. (2007). Public spaces and factors affecting public life. Bagh-e Nazar, 4(7), 59–73. ]in Persian[
Fenster, T. (2005). The right to the gendered city: Different formations of belonging in everyday life. Journal of Gender Studies, 14(3), 217-231.
Gholamhosseini, R., Pojani, D., Mateo-Babiano, I., Johnson, L., & Minnery, J. (2019). The place of public space in the lives of Middle Eastern women migrants in Australia. Journal of Urban Design, 24(2), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1518039
Greed, C. (2005). An investigation of the effectiveness of gender mainstreaming as a means of integrating the needs of women and men into spatial planning in the United Kingdom. Progress in Planning, 64(4), 243-321.
Habibi, M., & Ali Pourshejaei, F. (2015). A comparative study between two women-oriented public spaces and general urban public spaces in meeting women’s needs: A case study of Park Āb-o-Atash and Bahesht-e Mâdarân Park in Tehran. Honarhay-e Ziba - Architecture and Urbanism, 20(1), 17–30. ]in Persian[
Haji-Ahmadi Hamedani, A., Majedi, H., & Jahanshahlou, L. (2015). Investigating the criteria affecting the increase of women’s activity in urban spaces: A case study of Punak neighborhood (20-meter Golestan) in Tehran. Urban Studies Quarterly, 4(14), 47–60. ]in Persian[
Heim LaFrombois, M. E. (2019). (Re)producing and challenging gender in and through urban space: Women bicyclists’ experiences in Chicago. Gender, Place & Culture, 26(5), 659–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2018.1559251
Imanian, M., & Bahadori-Jahromi, E. (2022). The importance of urban green spaces on quality of life. Research Approaches in Social Sciences, Autumn 2022. ]in Persian[
Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House.
Krenichyn, K. (2004). Women and physical activity in an urban park: Enrichment and support through an ethic of care. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(1), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00053-7
Kalms, N., & Kuo, M. (Eds.). (2020). Making Cities Safer for Women: Designing for Safety in Urban Public Spaces. Routledge.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell.
(Original work published 1974)
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Blackwell.
Listerborn, C. (2015). Geographies of the veil: Violent encounters in urban public spaces in Malmö, Sweden. Social & Cultural Geography, 16(1), 95-115.
Massey, D. (1994). Space, Place, and Gender. University of Minnesota Press.
McDonnell, S., & Faludi, A. (2012). Urban Public Spaces and Gender Inclusivity. Urban Studies, 49(5), 987–1002.
Madani Pour, A. (2008). Public and private urban spaces (1st ed.). Tehran, Iran: Tehran Municipality Urban Planning and Processing Company. ]in Persian[
Majnounian, H. (1995). Topics on parks, green spaces, and recreation areas (1st ed.). Tehran, Iran: Parks and Green Space Organization. ]in Persian[
Mahdizadeh, J. (2008). An introduction to urban and gender theories: In search of more humane cities. Journal of Urban Studies, 24, 6–19. ]in Persian[
Navarrete-Hernandez, P., Vetro, A., & Concha, P. (2021). Building safer public spaces: Exploring gender difference in the perception of safety in public space through urban design interventions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 214, 104180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104180
Nasiripour, H. (2016). Investigating the relationship between the formation of participatory culture and strategic planning in Poldokhtar Municipality [Master’s thesis, Name of University]. https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/f5456c50f308687cb3797234f48bab0 ]in Persian[
Nasrollahzadeh, M. (2015). Physical planning for enhancing urban environmental quality with emphasis on participatory approach (Case study: Tehran, District 5, Punak neighborhood) [Master’s thesis, Name of University]. Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IRANDOC). https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/d3fddc6153790838f5ad1d2753ed4]in Persian[
Qi, J., Mazumdar, S., & Vasconcelos, A. C. (2024). Understanding the relationship between urban public space and social cohesion: A systematic review. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-023-00190-0
Sadeghi, A. R., & Jangjoo, S. (2022). Women’s preferences and urban space: Relationship between built environment and women’s presence in urban public spaces in Iran. Cities, 126, 103694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103694
Sadeghi, A. R., & Jangjoo, S. (2022). Women’s preferences and urban space: Relationship between built environment and women’s presence in urban public spaces in Iran.Cities, 126, Article 103694.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103694
Sajjadi, M., Ahmadi, F., & Rezaei, N. (2017). Women’s needs in urban public spaces: A case study. Iranian Urbanism Journal, 10(2), 55–72. ]in Persian[
Sajjadi, Zh., Vahidi Yeganeh, F., & Idris Jahangir. (2017). Measuring the level of social security feeling in urban parks with emphasis on gender (Case study: Didgah Park of Sanandaj). ]in Persian[
Saeidnīā, A. (2004). Urban green spaces. Ketab Sabz Shahrdari (Vol. 10). Ministry of Interior. ]in Persian[
Soltanzadeh, H. (2003). From garden to park. Anthropology Letter Quarterly, (4), 91–113. ]in Persian[
Safapour, M., Pirry, F., Amanpour, S., & Shujaeian, A. (2015). Examining women’s sense of security in urban parks with an emphasis on environmental (physical) and social indicators: A case study of Ilam city. Journal of Women in Policing, (23), 5–29. ]in Persian[
Statistical Center of Iran. (2016). The 2016 general census of population and housing. ]in Persian[
Tamaddon, R. (2008). Women and urban spaces. Quarterly Journal of Urbanism Studies, 7, 20–23. ]in Persian[
Tehran Municipality Urban Planning and Development Research Center. (1994). Green space distribution systems. Tehran, Iran: Urban Planning and Development Research Center. ]in Persian[
Whitzman, C., Legacy, C., Andrew, C., Klodawsky, F., Shaw, M., & Viswanath, K. (Eds.). (2013). Building Inclusive Cities: Women's Safety and the Right to the City. Routledge.
Wijntuin, P., & Koster, M. (2019). Dutch-Moroccan girls navigating public space: Wandering as an everyday spatial practice. Space and Culture, 22(3), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331219842880
UN-Habitat. (2016b). World cities report 2016: Urbanization and development—Emerging futures. United Nations Human Settlements https://unhabitat.org
Zabet, S. (2014). Planning of urban parks with a sustainable development approach (Case study: District one of Mashhad city) [Master’s thesis, Ganj, Scientific Information Database of Iran (IRANDOC ID: e9e1f3a5f1ac49142e21b13016eafe2)]. ]in Persian[