نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و هنر، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران.

2 دانش آموخته‌ دکتری، گروه شهرسازی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران.

3 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه شهرسازی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران.

چکیده

در دو دهه اخیر، رویکرد راهبردی مبتنی بر ترسیم چشم‌انداز مشترک برای شهرها در نظام برنامه‌ریزی شهری ایران مطرح شده است. در این راستا، پژوهش حاضر به بررسی«رویداد مردمی؛ رشت 1422» و اهمیت رویدادپذیری شهرها در شکل‌گیری این چشم‌اندازها پرداخته است. از این‌رو با اتخاذ روش تحلیل سیاست در یک مدل گسترده‌تر که شامل تحلیل متنی است، چهار گام در فرایند ترسیم چشم‌انداز و برگزاری رویداد مردمی؛ رشت 1422 طی شد و مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. گام نخست شامل مرور مبانی نظری بود. در گام دوم با تدقیق مدل مفهومی برای شکل‌گیری رویداد مردمی شهر رشت و اهمیت کنار هم قرارگیری سه‌گانه‌ فضا و مکان، شهروندان و نهادها و مدیریت شهری در شکل‌گیری فضای زبانی و تعاملی در ترسیم چشم‌انداز تبیین شد. سپس در ادامه‌ این گام، مروری کیفی و دسته‌بندی از اسناد تولید سیاست با استفاده از تحلیل متنی صورت گرفت. پس از مرور اسناد، در گام سوم پیش‌تعریف شکل‌گیری رویداد شامل تکمیل و تحلیل پرسشنامه‌ها و مصاحبه‌های عمیق از شهروندان، جلسات کارگروهی و مصاحبه‌ با ذی نفوذان و در نهایت اتخاذ نظرات نخبگان و تأثیرگذاران در شهر رشت انجام شد تا با توجه به ماهیت مشارکتی بودن چشم‌اندازسازی، محورهای اصلی چشم‌انداز در حضور اکثریت ذی نفعان و ذی نفوذان ترسیم شود. سپس در گام چهارم و نهایی، رویداد اصلی برگزار شد و با تکمیل سه فعالیت اصلی در رویداد، 29 محور اصلی چشم‌اندازها تکمیل و اولویت‌بندی شدند و بیانیه‌ چشم‌انداز تکمیل شد. این پژوهش با پیاده‌سازی گام‌به‌گام رویداد مشارکتی، الگویی عملی برای افزایش مشارکت شهروندان و کلیه ذی‌نفعان و ذی‌نفوذان در فرآیند ترسیم چشم‌اندازهای شهری ارائه کرده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Role of Events in Shaping Collective Urban Visions: A Case Study of the 'Rasht’s Civic Event 1422'

نویسندگان [English]

  • Aliakbar Salaripour 1
  • Sara Nikmard Namin 2
  • Mohammad Nouripour sedehi 3
  • Zahra Ahmadi 3

1 Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art & Architecture, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.

2 Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art & Architecture, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.

3 Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art & Architecture, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Highlights

Events as an operational mechanism: Public events function as core methodological instruments in strategic-operational planning, rather than mere symbolic gestures.
A practical step-by-step model: The study introduces a scalable, procedural model for integrating public events throughout the urban visioning process.

Extended Abstract
Introduction
In recent decades, Iran’s urban planning system has faced persistent criticism regarding the inefficacy of conventional master and detailed plans. These top-down frameworks have largely failed to address the dynamic needs of contemporary cities or meet the expectations of citizens, practitioners, and policymakers. Consequently, strategic planning—centered on formulating a shared, long-term vision—has emerged as a compelling alternative. While numerous studies have addressed participatory planning theoretically, few have examined the empirical, step-by-step implementation of participatory visioning in a real-world context. This paper addresses this gap by analyzing ‘Rasht’s Civic Event 1422’, a public initiative designed to formulate a shared vision for the city of Rasht within its strategic-operational planning framework. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the stages of ‘event-readiness’ in achieving a shared vision, thereby offering a replicable practical model for other Iranian municipalities.
Theoretical Framework
The theoretical foundation of this research rests on three interconnected pillars: participatory strategic planning, collaborative visioning, and event-based public engagement.
Participatory strategic planning asserts that effective urban strategy must originate from an inclusive visioning process involving municipal management, the private sector, civil society, and the general public. Participation legitimizes decision-making, broadens perspectives, and enhances social capacity. However, the literature warns that participation remains tokenistic unless it actively empowers citizens and fosters robust stakeholder networks.
Collaborative visioning is defined as a collective process through which community members identify their current identity, core values, and future aspirations. Successful visioning requires two essential elements: a comprehensive baseline assessment of present conditions and genuine public engagement. Without these, visions remain bureaucratic exercises rather than living social contracts.
Events and festivals (including public gatherings and carnivals) are proposed here as strategic catalysts for engagement. Events create unique socio-linguistic spaces where citizens, institutions, and urban environments converge. They facilitate dialogue, foster a sense of belonging, and amplify diverse voices, including those of marginalized groups. Based on this synthesis, the study developed a conceptual framework (Figure 1) positing that effective visioning occurs when citizens, urban institutions, and physical space interact through event-driven dialogue. This interaction generates a shared language and a mutual understanding of collective values.
 
(Figure 1. Conceptual Framework)
Methodology
This research employs a policy analysis methodology within an extended framework that incorporates qualitative textual analysis. The study followed a four-step process:

Step 1: Literature Review: Examining the theoretical foundations of participation, visioning, and event-based planning.
Step 2: Textual Analysis: Refining the conceptual framework and conducting qualitative content analysis of national, regional, and local strategic documents, alongside international case studies.
Step 3: Pre-event Process Analysis: Collecting multi-dimensional data through:
900 structured questionnaires across Rasht’s five districts (Cochran’s formula, 0.08 margin of error).
30 in-depth interviews with citizens.
50 semi-structured interviews with experts, elites, and city council members (snowball sampling).
Consultations with 102 thematic working group participants and 25 district-level stakeholders.
Step 4: Event Analysis: The primary public event, ‘Rasht’s Civic Event 1422’, was held on July 16, 2023, in the pedestrian zone of Rasht’s Municipality Square. The event engaged approximately 500 adults and 100 children through: (a) interactive mapping of local challenges and assets; (b) a children’s drawing workshop titled ‘My Lovable City’; and © a ‘fingerprint voting’ system for prioritizing vision themes.

Results and Discussion
The findings demonstrate that event-based visioning is both feasible and effective, provided that participation is embedded throughout the entire planning cycle rather than treated as a final validation step. Key results include:

Divergent Priorities: A significant gap was observed between elite and citizen priorities. While experts emphasized smart governance and integrated management, citizens prioritized tangible, everyday concerns: river restoration, efficient public transport, waste management, and family-friendly public spaces. This divergence underscores the necessity of early-stage citizen involvement.
Synthesized Vision: The final vision statement (Horizon 1422/2043) successfully synthesized 29 strategic axes prioritized by the public.
Creation of ‘Language Spaces’: The event transformed the pedestrian square—a site of collective identity—into a platform for face-to-face interaction between planners and the public. Children’s drawings added a crucial intergenerational dimension, revealing desires for safety and nature often overlooked in formal technocratic documents.
Structural Barriers: Despite the event’s success, deep-seated challenges remain, including bureaucratic centralization, lack of managerial stability, and historical mistrust. Some citizens’ reluctance to participate in ‘fingerprint voting’ highlighted a lingering skepticism regarding whether their input would manifest as tangible change.

Conclusion
This research provides an empirically grounded model for utilizing public events as legitimate policy instruments that bridge the gap between technocratic planning and lived experience. The study concludes that:

Genuine participation requires citizen involvement from the earliest stages of problem identification, not just during final prioritization.
Sustainability of Participation: The effectiveness of public events is contingent upon their continuity. Consistent follow-up and oversight mechanisms are essential to enhance participatory capacity and strengthen citizens’ agency. Without such continuity, participation risks being reduced to a superficial, one-off exercise.
Institutionalization: ‘Event-readiness’ must be institutionalized within municipal frameworks through dedicated budgets, transparent feedback loops, and continuous reporting to the public.
Structural Reform: Without addressing the underlying pathologies of urban governance—such as bureaucratic resistance and systemic distrust—even the most well-designed events may remain symbolic gestures rather than drivers of participatory democracy.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Event-Readiness
  • Policy Analysis
  • Civic Event
  • Shared Vision
  • Strategic Planning
Abdollahi, M., Jam-Kasri, M., Beheshti, M. B., & Asgharpour, H. (2021). Barnameh-ye Rahbordi-Amaliati-ye Shahrdari-ye Tabriz (1398-1402) [Strategic-Operational Plan of Tabriz Municipality (2019-2023)]. Tabriz, Iran: Fadia. [in Persian]
Albrechts, L. (2017). Strategic planning as a catalyst for transformative practices. Encounters in planning thought(pp. 202-219). Routledge.
Anthony Jr, B. (2024). The role of community engagement in urban innovation towards the co-creation of smart sustainable cities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy15(1), 1592-1624.
Barati, N. (2006). Challenges have to be faced in the context of urbanism in Iran at the beginning of the 21th century. Bagh-e Nazar, 3(6), 5-29. https://bagh-sj.com/article_70.html?lang=fa [in Persian]
Barati, N., Nikpeyma, M., & aalizadeh mollayosuf, S. (2021). The Space of Language (Language as a determining factor in the definition and perception of space). Urban Planning Knowledge5(1), 1-22. (in persian) https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2021.17647.1567 [in Persian]
Barnameh-ye Panjsaleh-ye Haftom-e Pishraft-e Jomhuri-ye Eslami-ye Iran (1402–1406) [The Seventh Five-Year Development Plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2023–2027)]. (2023). Tehran, Iran: Organization for Planning and Budgeting. https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/1809128 [in Persian]
Bherer, L., Dufour, P., & Montambeault, F. (2016). The participatory democracy turn: an introduction. Journal of civil society, 12(3), 225-230.
Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. John Wiley & Sons.
Burby, R. J. (2003). Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association69(1), 33-49.
Chitakira, M. (2024). Community visioning. In Handbook of Social Impact Assessment and Management(pp. 547-561). Edward Elgar Publishing.
City of Seattle Office of Planning & Community Development. (2015). Seattle 2035 comprehensive plan. Seattle, WA. https://www.seattle.gov/opcd/current-projects/seattle-2035-comprehensive-plan
City of Stockholm. (2015). Vision 2040: A Stockholm for Everyone. http://international.stockholm.se/governance/vision-2040/
City of Sydney. (2022). Sustainable Sydney 2030–2050: Continuing the vision. https://www.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/sustainable-sydney-2030-2050
Clark, J. K. (2021). Public values and public participation: A case of collaborative governance of a planning process. The American Review of Public Administration, 51(3), 199-212.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2023). Revisiting mixed methods research designs twenty years later. Handbook of mixed methods research designs, 21-36.
Curtis, M., & Jones, A. (2024). Measuring attitudinal change in community light festivals. In Reimagining Community Festivals and Events(pp. 159-182). Routledge.
Daneshgah-e Azad-e Eslami-ye Vahid-e Rasht. (2015). Tarh-e Jame’-e Imeni-ye Shahr-e Rasht dar Barabar-e Harigh [Comprehensive Fire Safety Plan of Rasht City]. Rasht, Iran: Shahrdari-ye Rasht. [in Persian]
Derrett, R. (2003). Making sense of how festivals demonstrate a community's sense of place. Event Management, 8(1), 49-58.
Dixon, T., Montgomery, J., Horton-Baker, N., & Farrelly, L. (2018). Using urban foresight techniques in city visioning: Lessons from the Reading 2050 vision. Local Economy, 33(8), 777-799.
Domaradzka, A., Biesaga, M., Domaradzka, E., & Kołodziejczyk, M. (2022). The civil city framework for the implementation of nature-based smart innovations: Right to a healthy city perspective. Sustainability, 14(16), 9887.
Dufour, S., Rodríguez-González, P. M., & Laslier, M. (2019). Tracing the scientific trajectory of riparian vegetation studies: Main topics, approaches and needs in a globally changing world. Science of the total environment, 653, 1168-1185.
Erfani, G. (2022). Reconceptualising Sense of Place: Towards a Conceptual Framework for Investigating Individual-Community-Place Interrelationships. Journal of Planning Literature, 37(3), 452-466.
Flaminio, S., Salomon Cavin, J., Guex, G., & Moretti, M. (2024). The urban in ecology: a quantitative textual analysis of the scientific literature over a century. Urban Ecosystems, 27(6), 2531-2542.
Fouladi, M., & Zabihi, H. (2015). Designing City Development Strategy (CDS) Based on Participatory Visioning in Bojnourd. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences: Proceedings, 4(3), pp-469.
Golkar, K. (2005). Cheshmandaz-e Shahr / Mahalleh: Pishnehad-e yek Charchoub-e Mafhoomi baraye Sorat-bandi-ye Bayanieh-ye Cheshmandaz [City/Neighborhood Vision: Proposing a Conceptual Framework for Formulating a Vision Statement]. Honar-ha-ye Ziba, (24), 25-36. [in Persian]
Government of Egypt. (2008). Cairo 2050: Strategic urban development plan. Ministry of Housing, Utilities & Urban Development.
Greater London Authority. (2021). The London Plan 2021: Spatial development strategy for Greater London. https://www.london.gov.uk/programmes-strategies/planning/london-plan
Habibi, K., & Sheikh Ahmadi, A. (2023). Evaluation of urban development plans and explanation of content inefficiency factors and their procedures in Iran. Sustainable city, 6(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.22034/jsc.2022.292057.1496 [in Persian]
Harris, E., Franz, A., & O’Hara, S. (2023). Promoting social equity and building resilience through value-inclusive design. Buildings, 13(8), 2081.
Hassanli, N., Walters, T., & Williamson, J. (2021). ‘You feel you’re not alone’: how multicultural festivals foster social sustainability through multiple psychological sense of community. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(11-12), 1792-1809.
Hungarian, S. R. F. (2007). The New Hungary Development Plan. National Strategic Reference Framework of Hungary, 2013.
Kaplan, M., Higdon, F., Crago, N., & Robbins, L. (2004). Futures festivals: An intergenerational strategy for promoting community participation. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 2(3-4), 119-146.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human communication research, 30(3), 411-433.
Luonila, M., Suomi, K., & Lepistö, T. (2019). Unraveling mechanisms of value cocreation in festivals. Event Management, 23(1), 41-60.
Mair, J., & Duffy, M. (2015). Community events and social justice in urban growth areas. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 7(3), 282-298.
Malyshkina, D. A. (2023). Issues of public participation in the management of urban space development. Социодинамика, 5, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7144.2023.5.40890
Markaz-e Motale’at va Tahghighat-e Shahrsazi va Memari-ye Iran. (2004). Tarh-e Makanyabi va Emkan Sanji-ye Bostanatha-ye Mosta’ed-e Gardshgari-ye Ostan-e Guilan [Site Selection and Feasibility Study of Tourism-Prone Areas in Guilan Province]. Tehran, Iran: Markaz-e Motale’at va Tahghighat-e Shahrsazi va Memari-ye Iran. [in Persian]
Markaz-e Pajouhesh-e Shoray-e Eslami-ye Shahr-e Rasht. (2012). Tahieh va Tadvin-e Sanad-e Cheshmandaz-e Bist Saleh va Barnameh-ye Estratezhik-e Panj Saleh-ye Shahrdari-ye Rasht [Preparation and Compilation of the 20-Year Vision Document and Five-Year Strategic Plan of Rasht Municipality]. Rasht, Iran: Shahrdari-ye Rasht. [in Persian]
Mega, V. (2022). Accountable strategic planning and citizen engagement. In Human Sustainable Cities: Towards the SDGs and Green, Just, Smart and Inclusive Transitions(pp. 225-250). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Mohandesan-e Moshaver-e Andishkar. (2015). Behengam-sazi-ye Motale’at-e Jame’-e Haml-o Naql va Tarafik-e Shahr-e Rasht [Updating Comprehensive Transportation and Traffic Studies of Rasht City]. Rasht, Iran: Shahrdari-ye Rasht. [in Persian]
Mohandesin-e Moshaver-e Kavab (Manabe’ Ab) va Mehraziyan (Shahrsazi va Memari). (1996). Tarh-e Kalbodi-ye Melli-ye Iran [National Physical Plan of Iran]. Tehran, Iran: Vezarat-e Maskan va Shahrsazi. [in Persian]
Mohandesin-e Moshaver-e Ma’ab. (2009). Motale’at-e Tarh-e Kalbodi-ye Mantaqe-ye Sahiei-ye Shomal (Guilan, Mazandaran va Golestan) [Physical Plan Studies of Northern Coastal Regions (Guilan, Mazandaran, and Golestan)]. Tehran, Iran: Markaz-e Motale’at va Tahghighat-e Shahrsazi va Memari-ye Iran. [in Persian]
Mohandesin-e Moshaver-e Naghsh-e Jahan-e Pars. (2012). Tarh-e Majmou’e-ye Shahri-ye Rasht [Rasht Urban Complex Plan]. Rasht, Iran: Edareh-ye Koll-e Rah va Shahrsazi-ye Ostan-e Guilan. [in Persian]
Mohandesin-e Moshaver-e Naghsh-e Jahan-e Pars. (2023). Tarh-e Tafsili-ye Rasht [Detailed Plan of Rasht]. Rasht, Iran: Edareh-ye Koll-e Rah va Shahrsazi-ye Ostan-e Guilan. [in Persian]
Mohandesin-e Moshaver-e Parhas. (2007). Sazmandahi-ye Harim-e Roodhaye-ye Zarjub va Goharrood [Organizing the Bed of Zarjub and Goharrood Rivers]. Rasht, Iran: Shahrdari-ye Rasht. [in Persian]
Mohandesin-e Moshaver-e Polshir. (2018). Sanad-e Bazafarini-ye Shahr-e Rasht ba Ruykard-e Shahr-e Ensan-mehvar [Rasht City Regeneration Document with a Human-Centered City Approach]. Tehran, Iran: Vezarat-e Rah va Shahrsazi, Sherkat-e Bazafarini-ye Shahri-ye Iran. [in Persian]
Mohandesin-e Moshaver-e Tarh va Kavosh. (2007). Tarh-e Jame’-e Shahr-e Rasht [Comprehensive Plan of Rasht City]. Rasht, Iran: Sazman-e Maskan va Shahrsazi-ye Ostan-e Guilan. [in Persian]
Molavi, M. and Nouripour sedehi, M. (2024). Analyzing the impact of self-determination theory in the asset-based community development by using the Fairclough's analytical framework. Urban Planning Knowledge8(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2025.26795.1924 [in Persian]
Ostad Ali Dehaghi, R., Gholami Nejad Amiri, S., Majidzadeh, R., & Garaei Nejad, G. (2021). Naghsh-e Olaviyatha va Foriyatha-ye Tose'eh-ye Iran[Map of Iran's Development Priorities and Urgencies]. Tehran, Iran: Markaz-e Pajouheshha-ye Tose'eh va Ayandegi. https://civilica.com/doc/1715301/ [in Persian]
Richards, G., & Palmer, R. (2012). Eventful cities. Routledge.
Rijal, S. (2023). The importance of community involvement in public management planning and decision-making processes. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 1(2), 84-92.
Sanad-e Bist Saleh-ye Cheshmandaz-e Jomhuri-ye Eslami-ye Iran (1384-1404) [The 20-Year Vision Document of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2005-2025)]. (2005). Tehran, Iran: Dabirkhaneh-ye Majma’-e Tashkhis-e Maslahat-e Nezam. [in Persian]
Sazman-e Barnameh va Budjeh-ye Keshvar (Dabirkhaneh-ye Shoray-e ‘Ali-ye Amayesh-e Sarzamin). (2020). Sanad-e Amayesh-e Ostan-e Guilan [Land Use Planning Document of Guilan Province]. Tehran, Iran. [in Persian]
Sazman-e Modiriyat va Barnamehrizi-ye Ostan-e Guilan. (2019). Sanad-e Amayesh-e Ostan-e Guilan [Land Use Planning Document of Guilan Province]. Tehran, Iran: Sazman-e Barnameh va Budjeh-ye Keshvar. [in Persian]
Seoul Metropolitan Government. (2019). Experience and challenges of urban planning in Seoul [Brochure]. https://english.seoul.go.kr/
Shahrdari-ye Ahvaz. (2018). Barnameh-ye Tose’eh va Omran-e Shahr-e Ahvaz (1397-1401) [Development and Urban Planning Program of Ahvaz City (2018-2022)]. Ahvaz, Iran: Mo’avenat-e Barnamehrizi va Tose’eh-ye Shahri-ye Shahrdari-ye Ahvaz. [in Persian]
Shahrdari-ye Astara. (2021). Barnameh-ye Rahbordi-Amaliati-ye Shahr-e Astara (1400-1405) [Strategic-Operational Plan of Astara City (2021-2026)]. Astara, Iran: Mo’avenat-e Barnamehrizi va Tose’eh-ye Shahri-ye Shahrdari-ye Astara. [in Persian]
Shahrdari-ye Kerman. (2021). Sanad-e Rahbordi-Amaliati-ye Shahrdari-ye Kerman (1400-1404) [Strategic-Operational Document of Kerman Municipality (2021-2025)]. Kerman, Iran: Mo’avenat-e Barnamehrizi va Tose’eh-ye Shahri-ye Shahrdari-ye Kerman. [in Persian]
Shahrdari-ye Tehran. (2019). Barnameh-ye Panjsaleh-ye Sevom-e Tose’eh-ye Shahrdari-ye Tehran (1398-1402) [The Third Five-Year Development Plan of Tehran Municipality (2019-2023)]. Tehran, Iran: Mo’avenat-e Barnamehrizi va Tose’eh-ye Shahri-ye Shahrdari-ye Tehran. [in Persian]
Shoray-e ‘Ali-ye Amayesh-e Sarzamin. (2020). Sanad-e Melli-ye Amayesh-e Sarzamin-e Keshvar-e Iran [National Land Use Planning Document of Iran]. Tehran, Iran: Dabirkhaneh-ye Shoray-e ‘Ali-ye Amayesh-e Sarzamin. [in Persian]
Shoray-e ‘Ali-ye Shahrsazi va Memari-ye Iran. (2008). Tarh-e Jame’-e Nahie-ye Markazi-ye Guilan [Comprehensive Plan of the Central District of Guilan]. Tehran, Iran: Dabirkhaneh-ye Shoray-e ‘Ali-ye Shahrsazi va Memari-ye Iran. [in Persian]
Shoray-e ‘Ali-ye Shahrsazi va Memari-ye Iran. (2008). Tarh-e Jame’-e Nahie-ye Markazi-ye Guilan [Comprehensive Plan of the Central District of Guilan]. Tehran, Iran. [in Persian]
Stevenson, N. (2022). The contribution of community events to social sustainability in local neighbourhoods. Events and Sustainability(pp. 38-53). Routledge.
Tarh-e Jame’-e Haml-o Naql va Tarafik-e Shahr-e Rasht [Comprehensive Transportation and Traffic Plan of Rasht City]. (n.d.). [in Persian]
Tng, S., & Tan, S. (Eds.). (2012). Designing our city: Planning for a sustainable Singapore. Urban Redevelopment Authority.
Tokyo Metropolitan Government. (2023). Tokyo Sustainability Action: For a sustainable future—City strategy plan 2023https://www.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/english/policies/sustainability/
van den Ende, M. A., Wardekker, A., Hegger, D. L., Mees, H. L., & Vervoort, J. M. (2022). Preparing Participatory Foresight Methods. In Towards a Climate-Resilient Future Together: Tools for Engaging Citizens for a Better Future(pp. 7-36). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Walzer, N., & Hamm, G. (Eds.). (2012). Community visioning programs: Processes and outcomes. Routledge.
Yolal, M., Gursoy, D., Uysal, M., Kim, H. L., & Karacaoğlu, S. (2016). Impacts of festivals and events on residents’ well-being. Annals of tourism research61, 1-18.
Zammit, A. (2017). Unlocking policy documents: Policy analysis in urban design. In Explorations in Urban Design(pp. 137-148). Routledge.
Ziakas, V. (2024). Rethinking Events: A Critique and Reconfiguration. Edward Elgar Publishing.